Terrific speech by Netanyahu to Congress

Iran was, and is, a client state of Russia. They were a client state of the USSR, and are a client state of Russia. As a state sponsor of terror, they are acting as one of many arms of Mother Russia.

It is amazing to me this actually has to be explained to some of the dumber rubes.

It is also precisely because Iran is the lap dog of Russia that a nuclear Iran is nowhere near as unstable as the hyperbolic pants shitters are led to believe.

This is why Russia has offered to provide uranium to Iran for nuclear power plants so as to undercut Iran's claim it is enriching for peaceful purposes.
 
I begin to see how Germany was allowed to rearm right in front of everybody in the 1930s, in clear violation of half a dozen treaties, and nobody lifted a finger to stop them.

Too many of these mewling liberals who kept insisting that "Peace in our Time" could be achieved through "negotiations".

And trusting that the guy rearming his warlike nation could be trusted to keep his word when he promised he'd stop.

Remind me how that worked out for them?

And now we see it happening again.
 
10407946_1036581793023093_5904716712303077938_n.png
 
This was nothing more than a campaign speech for his election in Israel in a couple of weeks.
Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.

What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???


So you want to drop negotiations and go directly to war? That is what the alternative is.
 
So, what does he want us to do for him in regards to Pakistan?

That's a good question.

India and Pakistan are mortal enemies the same way Iran and Israel are. India and Pakistan both have nukes.

Israel has nukes.

A nuclear Iran would not be good, but it does not automatically follow that nuclear war would result.

Neither Israel, nor Pakistan, nor India are currently being lead by a group of radical who want to create death, carnage, and chaos to hasten the return of the Mahdi. And the end of days
 
IRan is not the USSR. Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism and has been for decades.

The USSR was not a state sponsor of terrorism?
Not really, no. Certainly not the same way. The countries arent comparable in the least.
Wow. Now THAT is certainly the most ignorant thing said on this forum this year. And that is really saying something.

The USSR was the mother of state sponsors of terrorism.

You are correct the countries aren't comparable, but for the exact opposite reason you think.

And the ussr wasn't trying to bring about the end of days
 
This was nothing more than a campaign speech for his election in Israel in a couple of weeks.
Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.

What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???
Israel has a nuke and they havent used it.
What does that have to do with Netanyahu's campaign speech?
 
This was nothing more than a campaign speech for his election in Israel in a couple of weeks.
Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.

What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???


So you want to drop negotiations and go directly to war? That is what the alternative is.
Fifteen minutes before little bulldog posted this, Netanyahu said that some people would tell us that the only alternative to the present course, was war. But, he said, that is NOT the only alternative. The alternative is A BETTER DEAL.

One that the mewling liberals think is impossible... mostly because they don't think. They merely tremble and cry.

Netanyahu saw people like little bulldog coming a mile away.
 
This was nothing more than a campaign speech for his election in Israel in a couple of weeks.
Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.

What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???


So you want to drop negotiations and go directly to war? That is what the alternative is.
Chickenhawks don't know what they want. They have to wait for what Obama says or does, and then they demand the opposite.
 
This was nothing more than a campaign speech for his election in Israel in a couple of weeks.
Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.

What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???


So you want to drop negotiations and go directly to war? That is what the alternative is.

I guess you didn't watch the speech.
 
This was nothing more than a campaign speech for his election in Israel in a couple of weeks.
Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.

What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???


So you want to drop negotiations and go directly to war? That is what the alternative is.
Fifteen minutes before little bulldog posted this, Netanyahu said that some people would tell us that the only alternative to the present course, was war. But, he said, that is NOT the only alternative. The alternative is A BETTER DEAL.

One that the mewling liberals think is impossible... mostly because they don't think. They merely tremble and cry.

Netanyahu saw people like little bulldog coming a mile away.
If Obama got a 20 year deal instead of a 10 year deal, you malleable creeps would be whining that he forced a future Republican President to a deal that future Republican might not want.

You are as transparent as glass.
 
So you want to drop negotiations and go directly to war? That is what the alternative is.

I guess you didn't watch the speech.
He never does.

He just keeps droning "Liberalism good, conservatism bad, liberalism good, conservatism bad....."

....as the world moves closer and closer to a nuclear Iran while the U.S. liberal "leaders" look on and worry about their next election.

And then when the next plane hits a skyscraper in the U.S..... or a nuclear weapon goes off over Tel Aviv... he posts here, wondering who could have let THAT happen.
 
Last edited:
Not Present List of Lawmakers Skipping Netanyahu s Speech - Washington Wire - WSJ

dimocraps are the scum of the earth

Senate
Sen. Al Franken (D., Minn.)
Sen. Tim Kaine (D., Va.)
Sen. Martin Heinrich (D., N.M.)
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.)
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) (socialist scumbag = dimocrap, no difference)
Sen. Brian Schatz (D., Hawaii)
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D., R.I.)

House
Rep. Karen Bass (D., Calif.)
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D., Ore.)
Rep. Corrine Brown (D., Fla.)
Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D., N.C.)
Rep. André Carson (D., Ind.)
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D., Texas)
Rep. Katherine Clark (D., Mass.)
Rep. Lois Capps (D., Calif.)
Rep. Lacy Clay (D., Mo.)
Rep. James Clyburn (D., S.C.)
Rep. Steve Cohen (D., Tenn.)
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D., N.J.)
Rep. John Conyers (D., Mich.)
Rep. Danny K. Davis (D., Ill.)
Rep. Peter DeFazio (D., Ore.)
Rep. Diana DeGette (D., Colo.)
Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D., Texas)
Rep. Donna Edwards (D., Md.)
Rep. Keith Ellison (D., Minn.)
Rep. Chaka Fattah (D., Pa.)
Rep. Martha Fudge (D., Ohio)
Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D., Ariz.)
Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D., Ill.)
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D., D.C.)
Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D., Texas)
Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D., Ohio)
Rep. Barbara Lee (D., Calif)
Rep. John Lewis (D., Ga.)
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D., Calif.)
Rep. Betty McCollum (D., Minn.)
Rep. Jim McDermott (D., Wash.)
Rep. Jim McGovern (D., Mass.)
Rep. Jerry McNerney (D., Calif.)
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., N.Y.)
Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D., Texas)
Rep. Chellie Pingree (D., Maine)
Rep. David E. Price (D., N.C.)
Rep. Charles Rangel (D., N.Y.)
Rep. Cedric Richmond (D., La.)
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D., Ill.)
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D., Miss.)
Rep. John Yarmouth (D., Ky.)
 
Ongoing now. Tune it in.

He is describing the history of people trying to annihilate Jews, reciting quotes from Iran's recent leaders saying they want to do exactly that, pointing out example after example of Iran and other dictators reneging on their word to play nice and restrict their nuclear research... all in the last ten years.

He stated flatly that the greatest threat to the United STATES and Israel, and the rest of the world, is a marriage between a fanatic militant Jihadi state, and nuclear weapons.

Pointed out that just because Iran is helping us fight ISIS, that doesn't mean they are our friend. They and ISIS are competing for the title of Supreme Islamic Jihadi State. "If you defeat ISIS but let Iran get the Bomb, you win the battle but lose the war."

And he hasn't said a word about attacking Iran or any offensive military operations by the West.

Tune it in.

Why can't Western leaders be this cognizant and frank?

SNIP:

Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu used a controversial speech before the U.S. Congress to appeal to President Obama to pull back on nuclear talks with Iran, warning the "bad deal" in the works "paves Iran's path to the bomb" and could lead to a "potential nuclear nightmare."

The Israeli leader made his impassioned case Tuesday in a highly anticipated address in Washington. He claimed the potential deal would make two major concessions which would threaten the security of Israel and the region by retaining Iran's ability to start up a nuclear weapons program.

"This is a bad deal. It's a very bad deal. We're better off without it," Netanyahu said.

Netanyahu warns pending nuclear deal paves Iran s path to the bomb Fox News
 
Here's the realistic deal: Bombing Iran will only set it back a couple of years......with the added fact that virtually EVERY Shi'a Muslim will hate our guts (after all, when the "tail"...Israrel...."wags the dog"....the US, we will always be blamed).....
 
This was nothing more than a campaign speech for his election in Israel in a couple of weeks.
Wow. These liberals are STILL trying to pretend that Iran getting the Bomb will be no big deal, and that nothing more than petty partisan politics is involved.

What is the matter with these mewling liberals? Don't they see what's right in front of their faces???


So you want to drop negotiations and go directly to war? That is what the alternative is.
Fifteen minutes before little bulldog posted this, Netanyahu said that some people would tell us that the only alternative to the present course, was war. But, he said, that is NOT the only alternative. The alternative is A BETTER DEAL.

One that the mewling liberals think is impossible... mostly because they don't think. They merely tremble and cry.

Netanyahu saw people like little bulldog coming a mile away.


I heard what he said, and his claim of a better deal is one where Iran capitulates everything. That isn't going to happen. Sure, we need the best deal possible, and without certain assurances, it will never be signed, but it is unreasonable for Netanyahu to expect the agreement to only go one way. The deal he demands is impossible. Having said that, the only alternative is war. I don't want that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top