Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently

[montelatici]

1. The European Jews began attacking the indigenous non-Jews, Druze, Christians, Bedouins, Muslims long before any Arab armies intervened to try to prevent the Jew genocide and ethnic cleansing of the non-Jews, as British reports like the one below confirm. Note: The neighboring states intervened in May in an attempt to stop the Jew onslaught, this report is from January 1948.
"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

"...the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict...."
A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

You put a "1" in front of your opinion as though it was part of that UN document. I'm not certain (nor will I report your slimy effort to mislead) but I suspect that is a serious TOS infraction. I simply will point out that you are aware that your arguments are weak and you must stoop to Goebbel's-like propaganda tactics. Sieg Heil, Bubba.

On your charges, there was neither a "Jew genocide" nor was there ethnic cleansing and UN report makes no such claims but your efforts to sell your lies makes clear your agenda.

2. The U.N. partitioned Palestine taking the largest part and reserving for a small minority of the population of Palestine which were recent European colonists, at the expense of the indigenous non-Jews. . The UN also financed and helped the Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews.

Because the UN decision to sanction the European of Palestine resulted in the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population of Palestine, the UN is responsible directly for the creation of the Palestinian refugees, they assumed the responsibility of supporting the refugee population and their descendants.

Again you number your statement in a lame attempt to mislead. Your opinions are not part of those UN documents and your "facts" are absolute BS. The UN neither financed nor helped "Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews." There was neither genocide nor ethnic cleansing and the largest, best trained and best equipped (by Britain) force in the region was Jordan's Arab Legion.

The number 1. was to indicate my first point, the number 2. was for the second. The UN text is in quotes. You are truly a moron.

You are truly a liar.

Just fact. You are grasping at straws.

 

[Phoenall]

Obviously he thinks if he repeats it over and over again it will magically become true, kind of like Dorothy's red slippers in the Wizard of Oz.

You mean like this?

Hey dildo still waiting for that link to Israeli war crimes that names offenders and gives details ?

 

[Phoenall]

Not only that but the UN violated it's own charter and walked away along with the British leaving the Jews, Druz, and other ethnic groups to be genocided by Arab armies. They have zero credibility, and of course today look the other way at Arab atrocities and thousands upon thousands of 'international law' violations and atrocities that are everyday occurrences in every single one of Israel's 'neighbors'. Not only that, they actually subsidize them for their behavior; they're the best fed and pampered 'refugees' in world history, thanks to their UN benefactors.

What are the odds the ICJ will bring charges against the UN and itself?

If that was true, then why is it Israel who is in violation of over 100 UN resolutions on human rights?

Because they aren't if you look at who brought the charges, which is why they get vetoed every time

 

[Phoenall]

Incorrect again Princess but then, aren't you always? The UN is not in the nation building biz and has neither the right nor the authority to establish (or deny) any country's existence. You lose again.

Well, why did it have the right to create Israel? I think you lose again.

The UN did not create Israel but thanks for playing.

Nov. 29, 1947 | U.N. Partitions Palestine, Allowing for Creation of Israel

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...ns-palestine-allowing-for-creation-of-israel/

Yanno, I just suggested that our village idiot, thelick, go to larger fonts and pretty colors and look who takes my advice. As for your post, nowhere does it say that the UN created Israel (look up the meaning of "allowing for") but again, thanks for playing.

Look up the meaning of "allowing" and then consider what would have happened if the UN had not allowed for the creation of Israel. As the forum's court jester you don't subscribe to the old adage which states "better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt". You should, especially when you respond to me. I have forgotten more about this issue than you will ever learn.

The UN did not have the authority to allow anything as the die was already cast by the LoN in 1923

 

[SAYIT]

1. The European Jews began attacking the indigenous non-Jews, Druze, Christians, Bedouins, Muslims long before any Arab armies intervened to try to prevent the Jew genocide and ethnic cleansing of the non-Jews, as British reports like the one below confirm. Note: The neighboring states intervened in May in an attempt to stop the Jew onslaught, this report is from January 1948.
"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

"...the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict...."
A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

You put a "1" in front of your opinion as though it was part of that UN document. I'm not certain (nor will I report your slimy effort to mislead) but I suspect that is a serious TOS infraction. I simply will point out that you are aware that your arguments are weak and you must stoop to Goebbel's-like propaganda tactics. Sieg Heil, Bubba.

On your charges, there was neither a "Jew genocide" nor was there ethnic cleansing and UN report makes no such claims but your efforts to sell your lies makes clear your agenda.

2. The U.N. partitioned Palestine taking the largest part and reserving for a small minority of the population of Palestine which were recent European colonists, at the expense of the indigenous non-Jews. . The UN also financed and helped the Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews.

Because the UN decision to sanction the European of Palestine resulted in the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population of Palestine, the UN is responsible directly for the creation of the Palestinian refugees, they assumed the responsibility of supporting the refugee population and their descendants.

Again you number your statement in a lame attempt to mislead. Your opinions are not part of those UN documents and your "facts" are absolute BS. The UN neither financed nor helped "Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews." There was neither genocide nor ethnic cleansing and the largest, best trained and best equipped (by Britain) force in the region was Jordan's Arab Legion.

The number 1. was to indicate my first point, the number 2. was for the second. The UN text is in quotes. You are truly a moron.

You are truly a liar.

Just fact. You are grasping at straws.

Your problem being that neither the facts nor your sources support your claims and conclusions. Wiggle all you like but 2=2 does not equal 5 and the UN did not create Israel. Now back to the drawing board, Princess.

 

[Phoenall]

Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently

You don't have to be a pro-Israel activist to be troubled by the grotesquely unjust treatment of Israel.

It's appalling to see how Israel is treated by a totally different standard than other countries in the international system.

Well another Zionist Bloggist,and what a Curr......the Sate of Israel was NEVER ratified by the UN Security Council......thus illegal,...

Incorrect again Princess but then, aren't you always? The UN is not in the nation building biz and has neither the right nor the authority to establish (or deny) any country's existence. You lose again.

Well, why did it have the right to create Israel? I think you lose again.

Because it didn't, that was done by the LoN in 1923. The UN attempted to create another Islamic state in the middle of the Jewish National Home and failed.

Misconception. The newly minted Israelis established Israel on May 12, 1948.

On land that was granted to them in 1923 by the LoN that entered into International law. Then the UN amended the UN charter with the Jewish promise and set Israel in stone

 

[montelatici]

If it weren't true, you would have refuted my post with some facts. You didn't of course, because what I said is indeed true.

Okay, here's some facts:
What part of the Charter did the UN violate when Jewish terrorist groups massacred the entire Arab village of Deir Yassin?

Jewish terrorist groups did not massacre the entre village of Deir Yassin, rendering your question - and indeed you entire post - moot. Thanks for playing.

1. The European Jews began attacking the indigenous non-Jews, Druze, Christians, Bedouins, Muslims long before any Arab armies intervened to try to prevent the Jew genocide and ethnic cleansing of the non-Jews, as British reports like the one below confirm. Note: The neighboring states intervened in May in an attempt to stop the Jew onslaught, this report is from January 1948.
"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

"...the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict...."
A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

You put a "1" in front of your opinion as though it was part of that UN document. I'm not certain (nor will I report your slimy effort to mislead) but I suspect that is a serious TOS infraction. I simply will point out that you are aware that your arguments are weak and you must stoop to Goebbel's-like propaganda tactics. Sieg Heil, Bubba.

On your charges, there was neither a "Jew genocide" nor was there ethnic cleansing and UN report makes no such claims but your efforts to sell your lies makes clear your agenda.

2. The U.N. partitioned Palestine taking the largest part and reserving for a small minority of the population of Palestine which were recent European colonists, at the expense of the indigenous non-Jews. . The UN also financed and helped the Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews.

Because the UN decision to sanction the European of Palestine resulted in the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population of Palestine, the UN is responsible directly for the creation of the Palestinian refugees, they assumed the responsibility of supporting the refugee population and their descendants.

Again you number your statement in a lame attempt to mislead. Your opinions are not part of those UN documents and your "facts" are absolute BS. The UN neither financed nor helped "Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews." There was neither genocide nor ethnic cleansing and the largest, best trained and best equipped (by Britain) force in the region was Jordan's Arab Legion.

Firstly, you are not interested in the truth you are only interested in supporting the Zionist myth. You question editorial techniques to try to deflect from the facts as reportedly contemporaneously by the British the UN etc. Access to the source documents has exploded the Zionist myth which was created to justify what was clearly a European neocolonial project, after colonialism had fallen in disrepute by caharcterizinf the colonization as something different than it was.

The Arab Legion was under British Command during the period in question. Jan-May 1948.

""UNITED KINGDOM DELEGATION TO THE UNITED NATIONS
Empire State Building
New York 1, New York
23rd March, 1948

My dear Bunche,
You may have seen reports in the New York press to the effect that several units of the Arab Legion have recently moved into the Hebron area from Transjordan as a result of orders received from the Arab League.

2. I have been in communication with Jerusalem on this point and have received the following information: -

• • 
    (i) Elements of the Arab Legion serving in Palestine under British command have recently been posted to the Hebron area.
    (ii) This is part of the general re-deployment of forces under the command of the General Officer Commanding and in conformity with his policy of, as far as possible, posting elements of the Arab Legion serving under his command to Arab areas.
    
    (iii) It is thus not correct that units of the Arab Legion now in the Hebron area moved in from Transjordan as a result of orders from the Arab League.
    

3. This information has been given to the Jewish Agency representatives in New York in reply to an enquiry received from them.

Yours sincerely,
(Signed)
(J. Fletcher-Cooke)

Dr. Ralph J. Bunche,
Principal Secretary to the United Nations
Commission on Palestine,
United Nations,
Lake Success."

A AC.21 UK 83 of 24 March 1948

"The Commission agreed to accept the offer of the Jewish Agency for Palestine to undertake with the assent and assistance of the Commission necessary steps between now and the termination of the Mandate, looking to the establishment of a militia for the Jewish state. "

- See more at: Palestine question - Organization of armed militias - Press release 29 January 1948

 

[Phoenall]

Well another Zionist Bloggist,and what a Curr......the Sate of Israel was NEVER ratified by the UN Security Council......thus illegal,...

Incorrect again Princess but then, aren't you always? The UN is not in the nation building biz and has neither the right nor the authority to establish (or deny) any country's existence. You lose again.

Well, why did it have the right to create Israel? I think you lose again.

The UN did not create Israel but thanks for playing.

Not only that but the UN violated it's own charter and walked away along with the British leaving the Jews, Druz, and other ethnic groups to be genocided by Arab armies. They have zero credibility, and of course today look the other way at Arab atrocities and thousands upon thousands of 'international law' violations and atrocities that are everyday occurrences in every single one of Israel's 'neighbors'. Not only that, they actually subsidize them for their behavior; they're the best fed and pampered 'refugees' in world history, thanks to their UN benefactors.

What are the odds the ICJ will bring charges against the UN and itself?

1. The European Jews began attacking the indigenous non-Jews, Druze, Christians, Bedouins, Muslims long before any Arab armies intervened to try to prevent the Jew genocide and ethnic cleansing of the non-Jews, as British reports like the one below confirm. Note: The neighboring states intervened in May in an attempt to stop the Jew onslaught, this report is from January 1948.

"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

• 
  "...the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict...."

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

2. The U.N. partitioned Palestine taking the largest part and reserving for a small minority of the population of Palestine which were recent European colonists, at the expense of the indigenous non-Jews. . The UN also financed and helped the Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews.

Because the UN decision to sanction the European of Palestine resulted in the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population of Palestine, the UN is responsible directly for the creation of the Palestinian refugees, they assumed the responsibility of supporting the refugee population and their descendants.

SPAMMING and TROLLING the board again with the same crap that has been posted hundreds of times already,

 

[Votto]

Ran across this on another site and thought it would fit here. Apologies if someone already posted it.

Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently

You don't have to be a pro-Israel activist to be troubled by the grotesquely unjust treatment of Israel.

...


It's appalling to see how Israel is treated by a totally different standard than other countries in the international system. Of course, Israel deserves scrutiny, as does every other nation. But it also merits equal treatment – nothing more, nothing less.

First, Israel is the only UN member state whose very right to exist is under constant challenge.


Notwithstanding the fact that Israel embodies an age-old connection with the Jewish people as repeatedly cited in the most widely read book in the world, the Bible, that it was created based on the 1947 recommendation of the UN, and that it has been a member of the world body since 1949, there's a relentless chorus of nations, institutions, and individuals denying Israel's very political legitimacy.


No one would dare question the right to exist of many other countries whose basis for legitimacy is infinitely more questionable than Israel's, including those that were created by brute force, occupation, or distant mapmakers. Just look around at how many nations fit those categories, including, by the way, quite a few Arab countries. Why, then, is it open hunting season only on Israel? Could it possibly have anything to do with the fact that it's the only Jewish-majority country in the world?

...

Sums up most of the salient points throughout the rest of the article.

Damn right Israel is treated differently!

They're the only country on the planet that can commit this many war crimes and not be held accountable for them.

You mean like the Sudan and their genocide against Christians?

Yep, those damn Jews building walls and boarding ships has to stop!!

 

[SAYIT]

On land that was granted to them in 1923 by the LoN that entered into International law. Then the UN amended the UN charter with the Jewish promise and set Israel in stone

Not stone ... sand.
UN 181 was a non-binding Gen Ass resolution that recommended a solution to conflicting Arab and Zionist nationalist aspirations and offered UN membership as a bone. The UN does not (nor does it have the authority to) create states. The Zionists created Israel on May 14, 1948 which was soon, as promised, granted UN membership. The Arabs violently rejected their opportunity for statehood as well as the new Jewish Homeland.

 

[Phoenall]

The UN did not create Israel but thanks for playing.

Nov. 29, 1947 | U.N. Partitions Palestine, Allowing for Creation of Israel

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...ns-palestine-allowing-for-creation-of-israel/

Yanno, I just suggested that our village idiot, thelick, go to larger fonts and pretty colors and look who takes my advice. As for your post, nowhere does it say that the UN created Israel (look up the meaning of "allowing for") but again, thanks for playing.

Look up the meaning of "allowing" and then consider what would have happened if the UN had not allowed for the creation of Israel. As the forum's court jester you don't subscribe to the old adage which states "better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt". You should, especially when you respond to me. I have forgotten more about this issue than you will ever learn.

I rarely encounter one of you pompous Nazi-types who doesn't believe he is superior to everyone else. You and your "knowledge" are right "up" there with thelick.

That the UN suggested partition, Gen Ass Res 181, did not create either Israel or an Arab state as exhibited by the non-existence of the Arab state. What that NON-BINDING resolution did do was offer a possible solution (partition) to a thorny problem and a reward (UN membership) for acceptance. The soon to be Israelis accepted the territorial plan - which was comprised of 3 small, mostly desert Bantustans (and included NONE of Jerusalem) - and went about the biz of building a country. The Arabs rejected the plan, attacked the nascent Jewish Homeland on her second day of existence and the rest, as they say, is history.

You may find strutting around this obscure message board in your Jack Boots and SS uniform to be gratifying but your "knowledge" and "understanding" of the conflict and the people is strictly Internet.

In terms of promoting Nazi/Fascist ideology, you are the one promoting Zionism, a similar racial/religious exclusive ideology. It is you that would look better in an SS uniform and jack boots. I lean towards the left, thoughI am a U.S. Army combat vet. What have you done for your country, punk.

181 said nothing about facilitating the creation of an Arab state but it did state:

"The mandatory Power shall use its best endeavours to ensure than an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State, including a seaport and hinterland adequate to provide facilities for a substantial immigration, shall be evacuated at the earliest possible date and in any event not later than 1 February 1948."

The non-Jews rightfully rejected the imposition of European colonization of their land.

The European Jews began attacking the non-Jews in an attempt to kill or evict them as early as January 1948. The attempt of the neighboring countries to defend the non-Jews from the on-going European Jew onslaught did not occur until May 1948.

Continue to demonstrate your ignorance, it is enjoyable.

You are the one showing their ignorance again as UN res 181 says this

A RES 181 II of 29 November 1947


3. Independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem, set forth in part III of this plan, shall come into existence in Palestine two months after the evacuation of the armed forces of the mandatory Power has been completed but in any case not later than 1 October 1948. The boundaries of the Arab State, the Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem shall be as described in parts II and III below.

4. The period between the adoption by the General Assembly of its recommendation on the question of Palestine and the establishment of the independence of the Arab and Jewish States shall be a transitional period.



Care to link to your claims in the above UN document ?-

 

[Phoenall]

Delete the patently ridiculous gibberish, and leave this ...

2. The U.N. partitioned Palestine taking the largest part and reserving for a small minority of the population of Palestine which were recent European colonists, at the expense of the indigenous non-Jews. . The UN also financed and helped the Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews.

Because the UN decision to sanction the European of Palestine resulted in the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population of Palestine, the UN is responsible directly for the creation of the Palestinian refugees, they assumed the responsibility of supporting the refugee population and their descendants.

So ... you think the Jordanians are the Israelis? They got over 85% of Palestine, and long before 1948. You're obviously utterly ignorant about any of this. Why do you keep embarrassing yourself? Do you get free cookies or something for this inane drivel? A pony ride or something?

The Jordanians are Jordanians and were living in Trans-Jordania. Palestinians are Palestinians and lived in Palestine. You are embarrassing yourself using Hasbara fairy tales in an attempt to rationalize the Zionist myth. Now run along before you put yourself in the class of Phoney and Ruddy.

According to the mandate for Palestine the Palestinians inhabited trans Jordan and where given a Saudi king to rule over them. You are the one embarrassing yourself after being shown hundreds of times that until 1947 trans Jordan was part of the mandate for Palestine. And until 1988 the Palestinians were part of Jordan.

Once again you spout islamocatholic NAZI JEW HATRED and LIES

 

[Phoenall]

On land that was granted to them in 1923 by the LoN that entered into International law. Then the UN amended the UN charter with the Jewish promise and set Israel in stone

Not stone ... sand.
UN 181 was a non-binding Gen Ass resolution that recommended a solution to conflicting Arab and Zionist nationalist aspirations and offered UN membership as a bone. The UN does not (nor does it have the authority to) create states. The Zionists created Israel on May 12, 1948 which was soon, as promised, granted UN membership. The Arabs violently rejected their opportunity for statehood as well as the new Jewish Homeland.

I refer to the Jewish clause slipped in to the UN charter in 1949m I believe that made Israel inviolate and everlasting



The reference here is, of course, to Article 80 of the UN Charter, once known unofficially as the Jewish People’s clause, which preserves intact all the rights granted to Jews under the Mandate for Palestine, even after the Mandate’s expiry on May 14-15, 1948. Under this provision of international law (the Charter is an international treaty), Jewish rights to Palestine and the Land of Israel were not to be altered in any way unless there had been an intervening trusteeship agreement between the states or parties concerned, which would have converted the Mandate into a trusteeship or trust territory


Article 80 and the UN Recognition of a Palestinian State Jewish Israel News Algemeiner.com



Making Israel the only nation with legal stats under International law. And Palestine illegal under the same clause in the UN charter

 

[Phoenall]

Again, either your reading comprehension is suspect or you are just stupid. Your contention is that the UN had nothing to do with the creation of Israel. I contended that it did. I also posted a section of 181 that specifically instructed the Mandatory to facilitate the creation of a Jewish state to enhance my contention.

The fact that the UN split off an area of Palestine for exclusive European rule and colonization is not in doubt.

The UN did not have that power, and 181 was just a recommendation. The Jews declared independence from the mandate under the terms of the mandate and not UN res 181.

 

[Phoenall]

If it weren't true, you would have refuted my post with some facts. You didn't of course, because what I said is indeed true.

Okay, here's some facts:

What part of the Charter did the UN violate when Jewish terrorist groups massacred the entire Arab village of Deir Yassin?
Name (3) international laws these Arab neighbors violate every day.
What are these behavioral subsidies you are referring to?
They wouldn't be refugees if it wasn't for Israeli atrocities.​

Where's your evidence to back up your bullshit claims? Or are you just going to continue shooting your little dumbass mouth off?

So list these 'Resolutions' along with who proposed them, and who voted for them in the General Assembly. Let's see if anybody should take them seriously.

It doesn't matter who proposed or voted for them. They passed and Israel is in violation of them. As a member state, Israel is duty bound to take them seriously.

Here's a few of them you little shit-*****, for your reading pleasure...

Res. 57 (Sep. 18, 1948) – Expresses deep shock at the assassination of the U.N. Mediator in Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte, by Zionist terrorists.

Res. 89 (Nov. 17, 1950) – Requests that attention be given to the expulsion of “thousands of Palestine Arabs” and calls upon concerned governments to take no further action “involving the transfer of persons across international frontiers or armistice lines”, and notes that Israel announced that it would withdraw to the armistice lines.

Res. 93 (May 18, 1951) – Finds that Israeli airstrikes on Syria on April 5, 1951 constitutes “a violation of the cease-fire”, and decides that Arab civilians expelled from the demilitarized zone by Israel should be allowed to return.

Res. 100 (Oct. 27, 1953) – Notes that Israel had said it would stop work it started in the demilitarized zone on September 2, 1953.

Res. 101 (Nov. 24, 1953) – Finds Israel’s attack on Qibya, Jordan on October 14-15, 1953 to be a violation of the cease-fire and “Expresses the strongest censure of that action”.

Res. 106 (Mar. 29, 1955) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Egyptian forces in the Gaza Strip on February 28, 1955.

Res. 111 (Jan. 19, 1956) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Syria on December 11, 1955 as “a flagrant violation of the cease-fire” and armistice agreement.

Res. 119 (Oct. 31, 1956) – Considers that “a grave situation has been created” by the attack against Egypt by the forces of Britain, France, and Israel.

Res. 171 (Apr. 9, 1962) – Reaffirms resolution 111 and determines that Israel’s attack on Syria on March 16-17, 1962 “constitutes a flagrant violation of that resolution”.

Res. 228 (Nov. 25, 1966) – “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property resulting from the action” by Israel in the southern Hebron area on November 13, 1966, and “Censures Israel for this large-scale military action in violation of the United Nations Charter” and the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan.

Res. 237 (Jun. 14, 1967) – Calls on Israel “to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants where military operations have taken place” during the war launched by Israel on June 5, 1967 “and to facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities”.

Res. 242 (Nov. 22, 1967) – Emphasizes “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, emphasizes that member states have a commitment to abide by the U.N. Charter, and calls for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied” during the June 1967 war.

Res. 248 (Mar. 24, 1968) – Observes that the Israeli attack on Jordan “was of a large-scale and carefully planned nature”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, “Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”, and “Calls upon Israel to desist from” further violations of resolution 237.

Res. 250 (Apr. 27, 1968) – Considers “that the holding of a military parade in Jerusalem will aggravate tensions in the area and have an adverse effect on a peaceful settlement of the problems in the area” and “Calls upon Israel to refrain from holding the military parade in Jerusalem which is contemplated” for May 2, 1968.

Res. 251 (May 2, 1968) – Recalls resolution 250 and “Deeply deplores the holding by Israel of the military parade in Jerusalem” on May 2, 1968 “in disregard of” resolution 250.

Res. 252 (May 21, 1968) – “Deplores the failure of Israel to comply with” General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, considers Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “invalid”, and calls upon Israel “to rescind all such measures already taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to change the status of Jerusalem”.

Res. 256 (Aug. 16, 1968) – Recalls Israel’s “flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter” condemned in resolution 248, observes that further Israeli air attacks on Jordan “were of a large scale and carefully planned nature in violation of resolution 248”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, and condemns Israel’s attacks.

Res. 259 (Sep. 27, 1968) – Expresses concern for “the safety, welfare and security” of the Palestinians “under military occupation by Israel”, deplores “the delay in the implementation of resolution 237 (1967) because of the conditions still being set by Israel for receiving a Special Representative of the Secretary-General”, and requests Israel to receive the Special Representative and facilitate his work.

Res. 262 (Dec. 31, 1968) – Observes “that the military action by the armed forces of Israel against the civil International Airport of Beirut was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned nature”, and condemns Israel for the attack.

Res.265 (Apr. 1, 1969) – Expresses “deep concern that the recent attacks on Jordanian villages and other populated areas were of a pre-planned nature, in violation of resolutions” 248 and 256, “Deplores the loss of civilian life and damage to property”, and “Condemns the recent premeditated air attacks launched by Israel on Jordanian villages and populated areas in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”.

Res. 267 (Jul. 3, 1969) – Recalls resolution 252 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, notes that “since the adoption of the above-mentioned resolutions Israel has taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions”, “Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, “Confirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status”, and urgently calls on Israel to rescind the measures taken to annex Jerusalem.

Looks like there's a whole lot of Israel attacking its neighbors, going on.

None of it

Illegal weapons, terrorism and acts of war




So no actual breaches of international law, making you a deluded fool and LIAR

 

[Phoenall]

If it weren't true, you would have refuted my post with some facts. You didn't of course, because what I said is indeed true.

Okay, here's some facts:
What part of the Charter did the UN violate when Jewish terrorist groups massacred the entire Arab village of Deir Yassin?

Jewish terrorist groups did not massacre the entre village of Deir Yassin, rendering your question - and indeed you entire post - moot. Thanks for playing.

1. The European Jews began attacking the indigenous non-Jews, Druze, Christians, Bedouins, Muslims long before any Arab armies intervened to try to prevent the Jew genocide and ethnic cleansing of the non-Jews, as British reports like the one below confirm. Note: The neighboring states intervened in May in an attempt to stop the Jew onslaught, this report is from January 1948.
"(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that

"...the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict...."
A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

You put a "1" in front of your opinion as though it was part of that UN document. I'm not certain (nor will I report your slimy effort to mislead) but I suspect that is a serious TOS infraction. I simply will point out that you are aware that your arguments are weak and you must stoop to Goebbel's-like propaganda tactics. Sieg Heil, Bubba.

On your charges, there was neither a "Jew genocide" nor was there ethnic cleansing and UN report makes no such claims but your efforts to sell your lies makes clear your agenda.

2. The U.N. partitioned Palestine taking the largest part and reserving for a small minority of the population of Palestine which were recent European colonists, at the expense of the indigenous non-Jews. . The UN also financed and helped the Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews.

Because the UN decision to sanction the European of Palestine resulted in the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population of Palestine, the UN is responsible directly for the creation of the Palestinian refugees, they assumed the responsibility of supporting the refugee population and their descendants.

Again you number your statement in a lame attempt to mislead. Your opinions are not part of those UN documents and your "facts" are absolute BS. The UN neither financed nor helped "Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews." There was neither genocide nor ethnic cleansing and the largest, best trained and best equipped (by Britain) force in the region was Jordan's Arab Legion.

Firstly, you are not interested in the truth you are only interested in supporting the Zionist myth. You question editorial techniques to try to deflect from the facts as reportedly contemporaneously by the British the UN etc. Access to the source documents has exploded the Zionist myth which was created to justify what was clearly a European neocolonial project, after colonialism had fallen in disrepute by caharcterizinf the colonization as something different than it was.

The Arab Legion was under British Command during the period in question. Jan-May 1948.

""UNITED KINGDOM DELEGATION TO THE UNITED NATIONS
Empire State Building
New York 1, New York
23rd March, 1948

My dear Bunche,
You may have seen reports in the New York press to the effect that several units of the Arab Legion have recently moved into the Hebron area from Transjordan as a result of orders received from the Arab League.

2. I have been in communication with Jerusalem on this point and have received the following information: -

• • 
    (i) Elements of the Arab Legion serving in Palestine under British command have recently been posted to the Hebron area.
    (ii) This is part of the general re-deployment of forces under the command of the General Officer Commanding and in conformity with his policy of, as far as possible, posting elements of the Arab Legion serving under his command to Arab areas.
    
    (iii) It is thus not correct that units of the Arab Legion now in the Hebron area moved in from Transjordan as a result of orders from the Arab League.

3. This information has been given to the Jewish Agency representatives in New York in reply to an enquiry received from them.

Yours sincerely,
(Signed)
(J. Fletcher-Cooke)

Dr. Ralph J. Bunche,
Principal Secretary to the United Nations
Commission on Palestine,
United Nations,
Lake Success."

A AC.21 UK 83 of 24 March 1948

"The Commission agreed to accept the offer of the Jewish Agency for Palestine to undertake with the assent and assistance of the Commission necessary steps between now and the termination of the Mandate, looking to the establishment of a militia for the Jewish state. "

- See more at: Palestine question - Organization of armed militias - Press release 29 January 1948

A press release that is not an official UN document, don't you read your links before shooting yourself in the foot freddy boy

 

[SAYIT]

Again you number your statement in a lame attempt to mislead. Your opinions are not part of those UN documents and your "facts" are absolute BS. The UN neither financed nor helped "Europeans organize militias to facilitate the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the non-Jews." There was neither genocide nor ethnic cleansing and the largest, best trained and best equipped (by Britain) force in the region was Jordan's Arab Legion.

Firstly, you are not interested in the truth you are only interested in supporting the Zionist myth. You question editorial techniques to try to deflect from the facts as reportedly contemporaneously by the British the UN etc. Access to the source documents has exploded the Zionist myth which was created to justify what was clearly a European neocolonial project, after colonialism had fallen in disrepute by caharcterizinf the colonization as something different than it was.

It is not I who interjects personal opinion into linked and quoted source documents but rather you and if your purpose here was to deal in the truth you wouldn't spend so much time twisting, distorting and truncating it.
As to the global realities and opportunities that led Zionists to create their state in what is now Israel, you again cherry-pick because the whole truth just doesn't support your lame claim. That said, you seem to have a bone to pick with the post WW2 world powers and as such I suggest you address your complaints directly to them.

The Arab Legion was under British Command during the period in question. Jan-May 1948.

""UNITED KINGDOM DELEGATION TO THE UNITED NATIONS
Empire State Building
New York 1, New York
23rd March, 1948

My dear Bunche,
You may have seen reports in the New York press to the effect that several units of the Arab Legion have recently moved into the Hebron area from Transjordan as a result of orders received from the Arab League.

2. I have been in communication with Jerusalem on this point and have received the following information: -

• • 
    (i) Elements of the Arab Legion serving in Palestine under British command have recently been posted to the Hebron area.
    (ii) This is part of the general re-deployment of forces under the command of the General Officer Commanding and in conformity with his policy of, as far as possible, posting elements of the Arab Legion serving under his command to Arab areas.
    
    (iii) It is thus not correct that units of the Arab Legion now in the Hebron area moved in from Transjordan as a result of orders from the Arab League.

3. This information has been given to the Jewish Agency representatives in New York in reply to an enquiry received from them.

Yours sincerely,
(Signed)
(J. Fletcher-Cooke)

Dr. Ralph J. Bunche,
Principal Secretary to the United Nations
Commission on Palestine,
United Nations,
Lake Success."

A AC.21 UK 83 of 24 March 1948

"The Commission agreed to accept the offer of the Jewish Agency for Palestine to undertake with the assent and assistance of the Commission necessary steps between now and the termination of the Mandate, looking to the establishment of a militia for the Jewish state. "

- See more at: Palestine question - Organization of armed militias - Press release 29 January 1948

Mere obfuscation. You seem to believe your reposting of irrelevant quotes is somehow obscured by your verbosity. Here is an inconvenient truth from your UNISPAL link (note that violence "between the two communities had been intensified"):

(b) In his review of the present situation in Palestine, on 14 January 1948, Sir Alexander stated that the Arabs had made it clear that “they proposed to resist with all the forces at their disposal the implementation of the partition plan. Moreover, since the first week in December the situation in Palestine had deteriorated rapidly. Violence conflict between the two communities had been intensified..."

For the Israelis not to have prepared for the clearly stated Arab intent to attack would have been national suicide.

 

[SAYIT]

The UN did not have that power, and 181 was just a recommendation. The Jews declared independence from the mandate under the terms of the mandate and not UN res 181.

Not quite. Israel declared her independence to coincide with the termination of the British Mandate, May 14, 1948.

 

[montelatici]

Of course the Arabs would resist the colonization of Palestine by Europeans but the fact remains:

""(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that:

• 
  “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict.""
  

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

 

[Phoenall]

Of course the Arabs would resist the colonization of Palestine by Europeans but the fact remains:

""(c) The representative of the Mandatory Power informed the Commission at its sixteenth meeting on 21 January 1948, that:

• 
  
  
  • 
    “in the present circumstances the Jewish story that the Arabs are the attackers and the Jews the attacked is not tenable. The Arabs are determined to show that they will not submit tamely to the United Nations Plan of Partition; while the Jews are trying to consolidate the advantages gained at the General Assembly by a succession of drastic operations designed to intimidate and cure the Arabs of any desire for further conflict.""

A AC.21 7 of 29 January 1948

Yet another of your links clearly shows that more Jews were killed and injured in the run up to independence than arabs, care to explain why this was ?