Ted Cruz Unwittingly Helps Democrats

[Pop23]

This is the GOP Presidential hopeful.....you can't get any dumber than this guy. I'm sure in his mind he thought he was doing something spectacular for the Republican Party and would be greatly rewarded.....instead he has angered a few of his peers. And for what?


In a rare Saturday session, the United States Senate ended up passing the $1.1 Trillion spending package that will keep most of the Federal Government funded through the end of the Fiscal Year, but not before a late Friday night political manuver by Texas Senator Ted Cruz allowed Democrats to spend most of Saturday easily confirming nominations that Republicans had long been blocking:

The vote concluded a long day of brinkmanship, spurred by a legislative challenge to Mr. Obama’s executive action on immigration by Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, who helped force the Senate into a weekend session. By the end of the day, Mr. Cruz found himself isolated even from members of his own party.

“I don’t see what we’re achieving here,” Senator Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, said of Mr. Cruz’s strategy.

Speaking of symbolic standoffs, it was thanks largely to an effort by Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee to create a symbolic standoff on the immigration issue that Democrats were able to spend the better part of yesterday pushing through a whole host of nomination that had been bottle necked for months:

Senior Republicans say there’s a problem with Cruz’s strategy: The GOP lacks the votes to stop Obama on immigration now, the $1.1 trillion spending package was speeding to passage, and they won’t resort to shutting down the government to mount their objections. Plus, the weekend session could allow Obama to get even more of his nominees confirmed.

So while Cruz and Lee argue they’re taking a hard stand against Obama, the result might allow Democrats to end the year with more of their priorities advanced — and the two conservatives getting nothing.


Senate Passes Spending Bill As Ted Cruz Maneuver Helps Democrats Pass Nominations

If he helps you chaps anymore, the Democratic Party will be extinct.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Cruz is a idiot. Both parties have 'em.

As for the demographics....the Democrat Party is screwed. White voters are leaving them in droves.

The Democrat formula for winning elections is 40% of the white vote and 90% of the black vote.

The last election cycle Dems only got 37% of the white vote. Kay Hagan in NC got 33%. Mary Landrieu only got 18%. You cannot win elections that way.

Even Dick Durbin in Illinois...in the bluest of blue states had white support drop 18% since he last ran 6 years ago.

The Dems have lost white male voters...maybe forever. Now white women are also leaving. Support among blacks voters during the last election cycle also seems to be slipping.

The Dems have a huge demographic problem. The divide and conquer strategy of a hyphenated America is no longer working.

Key quote from a recent AP story following the election last month.

"Democratic Senate candidates lost ground among white voters by an average of 10 points compared with 2008. White voters abandoned Democrats in droves in places with heated contests as well as those without much action."

Kay Hagan got just 33% of the white vote.
Mark Warner 37% of the white vote.
Mary Landrieu 18% of the white vote.
Even in blue Illinois: "Democratic Senator Dick Durbin captured 43 percent of the white vote in his successful bid for re-election, that's down 18 points from his support among whites in 2008."

That is a single snapshot for an off year election with a low voter turnout.

Here is what is happening long term demographically;

How bad is the Republicans demographic problem See for yourself Interactive - Yahoo News

View attachment 35076

Those settings are based on the Census Bureau population estimates.

Even though whites might be moving towards the GOP that only applies to the seniors. The Millennial generation isn't following them, rather it is headed towards the Dems since that is a better reflection of themselves.

So you can clearly see that 2016 is going to be a rough year for the GOP which is why they have drafted in Jeb Bush. He is an establishment candidate with strong Hispanic ties and moderate views. If he can avoid having to take an extremist rightwing running mate he might just make it but he will be the underdog in the race.

Furthermore look at what is about to happen in 2015. The Republicans have no choice but to come up with an Immigration bill. Failure to do so will mean that Obama's EO will be in effect. The TP'ers won't vote for a moderate rational bill which means they will be a major PR problem when it comes to passing Immigration Reform. If the GOP does pass a bill that harms Hispanics then Obama can veto it and look like a hero.

In essence it doesn't matter how many AWG's you have on your side they are not enough to beat the Dems. Republicans have to slap the TP'ers down and move to the center if they want to stand a chance in 2016 and beyond.

No.....the demographic trend is definitely against the Dems. The facts are not on your side. To dismiss the severe beating the Dems just took as the result of an off year election does not conform to the facts.

1. Per the AP....The Democrat Party has lost 10% of the white vote since 2008. That is a massive loss that cannot be easily replaced.

2. Less than 1 in 3 white men now vote Democrat.

3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.

4. The black vote is also beginning to erode for the Democrat Party per the Washington Post and other sources. Democrats lost 4% of the black vote from 2012 and 2% from the last off year election.

Republicans won 10 percent of the black vote on Tuesday. That 8217 s actually a step in the right direction. - The Washington Post


Key quote:

"In North Carolina, 54 percent of millennials chose Democratic nominee Sen. Kay Hagan -- who won 71 percent of the youth vote in 2008 -- but she lost to Republican state House Speaker Thom Tillis. In Georgia, 59 percent of the youth voted for Democratic candidate Michelle Nunn. But she ultimately lost to Republican candidate David Perdue, who received 39 percent of the youth vote.

In Iowa, Democrat Rep. Bruce Braley received 54 percent of millennials' votes, but lost overall to Republican Sen. Joni Ernst."


Election Results 2014 Most Millennials Voted Democrat But It Didn t Make A Difference In Some Senate Races


The Dems are rapidly losing white voters. They have lost white men....maybe forever. The erosion of support among black voters and the young would have to be very concerning.

Still drowning in denial or do you just have a serious comprehension problem with your own link?

There was an INCREASE in millennial participation in spite of it being an off year election with record low turnout.

Millennials comprised 13 percent of voters, 1 percentage point higher than in 2010, when youth voters made up 12 percent of the electorate.

That means that as Millennials grow older (the majority of them are now of voting age and the oldest will be 38 in 2016) they will become more and more of a factor in future elections. They do vote and they vote Dem in greater numbers than they vote GOP. Same for Hispanics. In the meantime your AWG's are reaching their sell by date and no longer participating in elections. Males die before females and the shifting demographics are a ticking clock that you can't stop.

From the US Census;

http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1141.pdf

CONCLUSION
The baby boom cohort will experience
a substantial decline in the
coming decades. The population
in the baby boom ages has been
decreasing in size since 2012, and
that pace of decline is expected
to accelerate as the baby boomers
grow older. When the first baby
boomers turned 65 in 2011, there
were just under 77 million baby
boomers in the population. By
2030, when the baby boomers will
be between 66 and 84 years old,
that number is projected to drop to
60 million and decrease further by
2060 to only 2.4 million. ​

Note that those numbers include minorities. Take out the minorities and whites who vote Dem and you cannot win an election with a dwindling voter base of AWG's. In the meantime the Millennials increase as a voting bloc and minorities have children who become registered voters and the GOP is left with a base that is dying off and nothing to offer that will attract voters to join the ranks of bitter old AWG's.

No girlfriend. Read again. Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.


The reality is the Democrat Party is rapidly losing white voters. That has been accelerating. Again....that cannot be argued. It is tough for Dems to win elections when almost 2 out of every 3 whites vote against them. The erosion of black and Millennial voters for the Democrat Party can also not be argued. Facts are facts. Sorry.

There is a reason the Dems lost so badly last month. They have a major problem with white voters and they are seeing a real erosion among the young and minorities.

The Democrat Party is in trouble right now. If they do not find a way to shore up their base and gain white support they will continue to struggle. Last month the GOP got an aggregate 4.5-5% more votes overall than Dems. No way to spin that in a positive way. There is also no way to suggest the Dems are in a great position in 2016.

Additionally, your census data is a non sequitur. It says absolutely nothing about how people are voting. My data speaks to exactly how people are voting. Even you must understand the difference. Voting blocs are changing. Census data says nothing about those changes. Again....your post = fail.

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Girlfriend.....try reading again. The data is across multiple election cycles. Others can read....why can't you?

I keep posting facts but your tiny brain can't seem to comprehend. These are just two of the many facts I posted. Notice they data goes across multiple election cycles.

Now take a deep breath and read again. But more carefully this time. Okay?


Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.

 

[Derideo_Te]

That is a single snapshot for an off year election with a low voter turnout.

Here is what is happening long term demographically;

How bad is the Republicans demographic problem See for yourself Interactive - Yahoo News

View attachment 35076

Those settings are based on the Census Bureau population estimates.

Even though whites might be moving towards the GOP that only applies to the seniors. The Millennial generation isn't following them, rather it is headed towards the Dems since that is a better reflection of themselves.

So you can clearly see that 2016 is going to be a rough year for the GOP which is why they have drafted in Jeb Bush. He is an establishment candidate with strong Hispanic ties and moderate views. If he can avoid having to take an extremist rightwing running mate he might just make it but he will be the underdog in the race.

Furthermore look at what is about to happen in 2015. The Republicans have no choice but to come up with an Immigration bill. Failure to do so will mean that Obama's EO will be in effect. The TP'ers won't vote for a moderate rational bill which means they will be a major PR problem when it comes to passing Immigration Reform. If the GOP does pass a bill that harms Hispanics then Obama can veto it and look like a hero.

In essence it doesn't matter how many AWG's you have on your side they are not enough to beat the Dems. Republicans have to slap the TP'ers down and move to the center if they want to stand a chance in 2016 and beyond.

No.....the demographic trend is definitely against the Dems. The facts are not on your side. To dismiss the severe beating the Dems just took as the result of an off year election does not conform to the facts.

1. Per the AP....The Democrat Party has lost 10% of the white vote since 2008. That is a massive loss that cannot be easily replaced.

2. Less than 1 in 3 white men now vote Democrat.

3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.

4. The black vote is also beginning to erode for the Democrat Party per the Washington Post and other sources. Democrats lost 4% of the black vote from 2012 and 2% from the last off year election.

Republicans won 10 percent of the black vote on Tuesday. That 8217 s actually a step in the right direction. - The Washington Post


Key quote:

"In North Carolina, 54 percent of millennials chose Democratic nominee Sen. Kay Hagan -- who won 71 percent of the youth vote in 2008 -- but she lost to Republican state House Speaker Thom Tillis. In Georgia, 59 percent of the youth voted for Democratic candidate Michelle Nunn. But she ultimately lost to Republican candidate David Perdue, who received 39 percent of the youth vote.

In Iowa, Democrat Rep. Bruce Braley received 54 percent of millennials' votes, but lost overall to Republican Sen. Joni Ernst."


Election Results 2014 Most Millennials Voted Democrat But It Didn t Make A Difference In Some Senate Races


The Dems are rapidly losing white voters. They have lost white men....maybe forever. The erosion of support among black voters and the young would have to be very concerning.

Still drowning in denial or do you just have a serious comprehension problem with your own link?

There was an INCREASE in millennial participation in spite of it being an off year election with record low turnout.

Millennials comprised 13 percent of voters, 1 percentage point higher than in 2010, when youth voters made up 12 percent of the electorate.

That means that as Millennials grow older (the majority of them are now of voting age and the oldest will be 38 in 2016) they will become more and more of a factor in future elections. They do vote and they vote Dem in greater numbers than they vote GOP. Same for Hispanics. In the meantime your AWG's are reaching their sell by date and no longer participating in elections. Males die before females and the shifting demographics are a ticking clock that you can't stop.

From the US Census;

http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1141.pdf

CONCLUSION
The baby boom cohort will experience
a substantial decline in the
coming decades. The population
in the baby boom ages has been
decreasing in size since 2012, and
that pace of decline is expected
to accelerate as the baby boomers
grow older. When the first baby
boomers turned 65 in 2011, there
were just under 77 million baby
boomers in the population. By
2030, when the baby boomers will
be between 66 and 84 years old,
that number is projected to drop to
60 million and decrease further by
2060 to only 2.4 million. ​

Note that those numbers include minorities. Take out the minorities and whites who vote Dem and you cannot win an election with a dwindling voter base of AWG's. In the meantime the Millennials increase as a voting bloc and minorities have children who become registered voters and the GOP is left with a base that is dying off and nothing to offer that will attract voters to join the ranks of bitter old AWG's.

No girlfriend. Read again. Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.


The reality is the Democrat Party is rapidly losing white voters. That has been accelerating. Again....that cannot be argued. It is tough for Dems to win elections when almost 2 out of every 3 whites vote against them. The erosion of black and Millennial voters for the Democrat Party can also not be argued. Facts are facts. Sorry.

There is a reason the Dems lost so badly last month. They have a major problem with white voters and they are seeing a real erosion among the young and minorities.

The Democrat Party is in trouble right now. If they do not find a way to shore up their base and gain white support they will continue to struggle. Last month the GOP got an aggregate 4.5-5% more votes overall than Dems. No way to spin that in a positive way. There is also no way to suggest the Dems are in a great position in 2016.

Additionally, your census data is a non sequitur. It says absolutely nothing about how people are voting. My data speaks to exactly how people are voting. Even you must understand the difference. Voting blocs are changing. Census data says nothing about those changes. Again....your post = fail.

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Yeah cause Millennials will never grow up to stand for personal responsibility, hard work, and success!

And yet 2014 was the best year for job growth since 1999. Thank you, President Obama.

2014 is Best Year for Job Gains Since 1999 whotv.com

 

[mamooth]

Twelve circuit judges confirmed yesterday. Those are lifetime positions. That's huge. No wonder the conservatives are crying. The conservative campaign to rewrite the Constitution can't go anywhere when there are so many anti-activist judges around to smack it down.

Thanks Ted Cruz! And thanks to Harry Reid for seizing the opportunity.

 

[WelfareQueen]

No.....the demographic trend is definitely against the Dems. The facts are not on your side. To dismiss the severe beating the Dems just took as the result of an off year election does not conform to the facts.

1. Per the AP....The Democrat Party has lost 10% of the white vote since 2008. That is a massive loss that cannot be easily replaced.

2. Less than 1 in 3 white men now vote Democrat.

3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.

4. The black vote is also beginning to erode for the Democrat Party per the Washington Post and other sources. Democrats lost 4% of the black vote from 2012 and 2% from the last off year election.

Republicans won 10 percent of the black vote on Tuesday. That 8217 s actually a step in the right direction. - The Washington Post


Key quote:

"In North Carolina, 54 percent of millennials chose Democratic nominee Sen. Kay Hagan -- who won 71 percent of the youth vote in 2008 -- but she lost to Republican state House Speaker Thom Tillis. In Georgia, 59 percent of the youth voted for Democratic candidate Michelle Nunn. But she ultimately lost to Republican candidate David Perdue, who received 39 percent of the youth vote.

In Iowa, Democrat Rep. Bruce Braley received 54 percent of millennials' votes, but lost overall to Republican Sen. Joni Ernst."


Election Results 2014 Most Millennials Voted Democrat But It Didn t Make A Difference In Some Senate Races


The Dems are rapidly losing white voters. They have lost white men....maybe forever. The erosion of support among black voters and the young would have to be very concerning.

Still drowning in denial or do you just have a serious comprehension problem with your own link?

There was an INCREASE in millennial participation in spite of it being an off year election with record low turnout.

Millennials comprised 13 percent of voters, 1 percentage point higher than in 2010, when youth voters made up 12 percent of the electorate.

That means that as Millennials grow older (the majority of them are now of voting age and the oldest will be 38 in 2016) they will become more and more of a factor in future elections. They do vote and they vote Dem in greater numbers than they vote GOP. Same for Hispanics. In the meantime your AWG's are reaching their sell by date and no longer participating in elections. Males die before females and the shifting demographics are a ticking clock that you can't stop.

From the US Census;

http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1141.pdf

CONCLUSION
The baby boom cohort will experience
a substantial decline in the
coming decades. The population
in the baby boom ages has been
decreasing in size since 2012, and
that pace of decline is expected
to accelerate as the baby boomers
grow older. When the first baby
boomers turned 65 in 2011, there
were just under 77 million baby
boomers in the population. By
2030, when the baby boomers will
be between 66 and 84 years old,
that number is projected to drop to
60 million and decrease further by
2060 to only 2.4 million. ​

Note that those numbers include minorities. Take out the minorities and whites who vote Dem and you cannot win an election with a dwindling voter base of AWG's. In the meantime the Millennials increase as a voting bloc and minorities have children who become registered voters and the GOP is left with a base that is dying off and nothing to offer that will attract voters to join the ranks of bitter old AWG's.

No girlfriend. Read again. Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.


The reality is the Democrat Party is rapidly losing white voters. That has been accelerating. Again....that cannot be argued. It is tough for Dems to win elections when almost 2 out of every 3 whites vote against them. The erosion of black and Millennial voters for the Democrat Party can also not be argued. Facts are facts. Sorry.

There is a reason the Dems lost so badly last month. They have a major problem with white voters and they are seeing a real erosion among the young and minorities.

The Democrat Party is in trouble right now. If they do not find a way to shore up their base and gain white support they will continue to struggle. Last month the GOP got an aggregate 4.5-5% more votes overall than Dems. No way to spin that in a positive way. There is also no way to suggest the Dems are in a great position in 2016.

Additionally, your census data is a non sequitur. It says absolutely nothing about how people are voting. My data speaks to exactly how people are voting. Even you must understand the difference. Voting blocs are changing. Census data says nothing about those changes. Again....your post = fail.

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Yeah cause Millennials will never grow up to stand for personal responsibility, hard work, and success!

And yet 2014 was the best year for job growth since 1999. Thank you, President Obama.

2014 is Best Year for Job Gains Since 1999 whotv.com

That's nice. Yet median family income has declined every year since 1999. 8.7% to be precise. The average American is worse off under Obama. That cannot be argued.

Second....the worker participation rate is the lowest it's been since the late 1970's. Again....that cannot be argued.

The phony unemployment numbers hide those key facts. Hence, the reason why Obama's approval numbers are so low and right track worng track number is so low. Americans are not stupid. They know if their lives are getting better or not.

Pesky facts again.....


Oh...and btw....the GOP just picked up another House seat. Tell us again how great things are for the Dems.

Republican wins Arizona House seat after recount - Yahoo News

 

[Sarah G]

This is the GOP Presidential hopeful.....you can't get any dumber than this guy. I'm sure in his mind he thought he was doing something spectacular for the Republican Party and would be greatly rewarded.....instead he has angered a few of his peers. And for what?


In a rare Saturday session, the United States Senate ended up passing the $1.1 Trillion spending package that will keep most of the Federal Government funded through the end of the Fiscal Year, but not before a late Friday night political manuver by Texas Senator Ted Cruz allowed Democrats to spend most of Saturday easily confirming nominations that Republicans had long been blocking:

The vote concluded a long day of brinkmanship, spurred by a legislative challenge to Mr. Obama’s executive action on immigration by Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, who helped force the Senate into a weekend session. By the end of the day, Mr. Cruz found himself isolated even from members of his own party.

“I don’t see what we’re achieving here,” Senator Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, said of Mr. Cruz’s strategy.

Speaking of symbolic standoffs, it was thanks largely to an effort by Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee to create a symbolic standoff on the immigration issue that Democrats were able to spend the better part of yesterday pushing through a whole host of nomination that had been bottle necked for months:

Senior Republicans say there’s a problem with Cruz’s strategy: The GOP lacks the votes to stop Obama on immigration now, the $1.1 trillion spending package was speeding to passage, and they won’t resort to shutting down the government to mount their objections. Plus, the weekend session could allow Obama to get even more of his nominees confirmed.

So while Cruz and Lee argue they’re taking a hard stand against Obama, the result might allow Democrats to end the year with more of their priorities advanced — and the two conservatives getting nothing.


Senate Passes Spending Bill As Ted Cruz Maneuver Helps Democrats Pass Nominations

If he helps you chaps anymore, the Democratic Party will be extinct.

No, the GOP will be split and Cruz will have a hit out on him from McConnell.

 

[Derideo_Te]

That is a single snapshot for an off year election with a low voter turnout.

Here is what is happening long term demographically;

How bad is the Republicans demographic problem See for yourself Interactive - Yahoo News

View attachment 35076

Those settings are based on the Census Bureau population estimates.

Even though whites might be moving towards the GOP that only applies to the seniors. The Millennial generation isn't following them, rather it is headed towards the Dems since that is a better reflection of themselves.

So you can clearly see that 2016 is going to be a rough year for the GOP which is why they have drafted in Jeb Bush. He is an establishment candidate with strong Hispanic ties and moderate views. If he can avoid having to take an extremist rightwing running mate he might just make it but he will be the underdog in the race.

Furthermore look at what is about to happen in 2015. The Republicans have no choice but to come up with an Immigration bill. Failure to do so will mean that Obama's EO will be in effect. The TP'ers won't vote for a moderate rational bill which means they will be a major PR problem when it comes to passing Immigration Reform. If the GOP does pass a bill that harms Hispanics then Obama can veto it and look like a hero.

In essence it doesn't matter how many AWG's you have on your side they are not enough to beat the Dems. Republicans have to slap the TP'ers down and move to the center if they want to stand a chance in 2016 and beyond.

No.....the demographic trend is definitely against the Dems. The facts are not on your side. To dismiss the severe beating the Dems just took as the result of an off year election does not conform to the facts.

1. Per the AP....The Democrat Party has lost 10% of the white vote since 2008. That is a massive loss that cannot be easily replaced.

2. Less than 1 in 3 white men now vote Democrat.

3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.

4. The black vote is also beginning to erode for the Democrat Party per the Washington Post and other sources. Democrats lost 4% of the black vote from 2012 and 2% from the last off year election.

Republicans won 10 percent of the black vote on Tuesday. That 8217 s actually a step in the right direction. - The Washington Post


Key quote:

"In North Carolina, 54 percent of millennials chose Democratic nominee Sen. Kay Hagan -- who won 71 percent of the youth vote in 2008 -- but she lost to Republican state House Speaker Thom Tillis. In Georgia, 59 percent of the youth voted for Democratic candidate Michelle Nunn. But she ultimately lost to Republican candidate David Perdue, who received 39 percent of the youth vote.

In Iowa, Democrat Rep. Bruce Braley received 54 percent of millennials' votes, but lost overall to Republican Sen. Joni Ernst."


Election Results 2014 Most Millennials Voted Democrat But It Didn t Make A Difference In Some Senate Races


The Dems are rapidly losing white voters. They have lost white men....maybe forever. The erosion of support among black voters and the young would have to be very concerning.

Still drowning in denial or do you just have a serious comprehension problem with your own link?

There was an INCREASE in millennial participation in spite of it being an off year election with record low turnout.

Millennials comprised 13 percent of voters, 1 percentage point higher than in 2010, when youth voters made up 12 percent of the electorate.

That means that as Millennials grow older (the majority of them are now of voting age and the oldest will be 38 in 2016) they will become more and more of a factor in future elections. They do vote and they vote Dem in greater numbers than they vote GOP. Same for Hispanics. In the meantime your AWG's are reaching their sell by date and no longer participating in elections. Males die before females and the shifting demographics are a ticking clock that you can't stop.

From the US Census;

http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1141.pdf

CONCLUSION
The baby boom cohort will experience
a substantial decline in the
coming decades. The population
in the baby boom ages has been
decreasing in size since 2012, and
that pace of decline is expected
to accelerate as the baby boomers
grow older. When the first baby
boomers turned 65 in 2011, there
were just under 77 million baby
boomers in the population. By
2030, when the baby boomers will
be between 66 and 84 years old,
that number is projected to drop to
60 million and decrease further by
2060 to only 2.4 million. ​

Note that those numbers include minorities. Take out the minorities and whites who vote Dem and you cannot win an election with a dwindling voter base of AWG's. In the meantime the Millennials increase as a voting bloc and minorities have children who become registered voters and the GOP is left with a base that is dying off and nothing to offer that will attract voters to join the ranks of bitter old AWG's.

No girlfriend. Read again. Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.


The reality is the Democrat Party is rapidly losing white voters. That has been accelerating. Again....that cannot be argued. It is tough for Dems to win elections when almost 2 out of every 3 whites vote against them. The erosion of black and Millennial voters for the Democrat Party can also not be argued. Facts are facts. Sorry.

There is a reason the Dems lost so badly last month. They have a major problem with white voters and they are seeing a real erosion among the young and minorities.

The Democrat Party is in trouble right now. If they do not find a way to shore up their base and gain white support they will continue to struggle. Last month the GOP got an aggregate 4.5-5% more votes overall than Dems. No way to spin that in a positive way. There is also no way to suggest the Dems are in a great position in 2016.

Additionally, your census data is a non sequitur. It says absolutely nothing about how people are voting. My data speaks to exactly how people are voting. Even you must understand the difference. Voting blocs are changing. Census data says nothing about those changes. Again....your post = fail.

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Girlfriend.....try reading again. The data is across multiple election cycles. Others can read....why can't you?

I keep posting facts but your tiny brain can't seem to comprehend. These are just two of the many facts I posted. Notice they data goes across multiple election cycles.

Now take a deep breath and read again. But more carefully this time. Okay?


Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.

You are basing everything on the results of 2014. The "comparisons" to earlier elections are irrelevant. All that matters are the LONG TERM DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS.

You cannot refute those trends because they are based upon the population changing. People are born, grow up, get older and eventually die. The birth rate for whites is already below that of minorities

Explaining Why Minority Births Now Outnumber White Births Pew Research Center s Social Demographic Trends Project

The nation’s racial and ethnic minority groups—especially Hispanics—are growing more rapidly than the non-Hispanic white population, fueled by both immigration and births. This trend has been taking place for decades, and one result is the Census Bureau’s announcement today that non-Hispanic whites now account for a minority of births in the U.S. for the first time.

The bureau reported that minorities—defined as anyone who is not a single-race non-Hispanic white—made up 50.4% of the nation’s population younger than age 1 on July 1, 2011. Members of minority groups account for 49.7% of children younger than age 5, the bureau said, and for 36.6% of the total population. The findings are included in the bureau’s first set of national population estimates since the 2010 Census, when 49.5% of babies under age 1 were minorities.

Hispanics are more than a quarter of the nation’s youngest residents, according to the new population estimates, accounting for 26.3% of the population younger than age 1. Among other major non-Hispanic groups, the share for whites is 49.6%; for blacks, 13.7%; and for Asians 4.4%.​

Doesn't matter how much you stomp your feet and hold your breath you cannot stop what is happening.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Still drowning in denial or do you just have a serious comprehension problem with your own link?

There was an INCREASE in millennial participation in spite of it being an off year election with record low turnout.

Millennials comprised 13 percent of voters, 1 percentage point higher than in 2010, when youth voters made up 12 percent of the electorate.

That means that as Millennials grow older (the majority of them are now of voting age and the oldest will be 38 in 2016) they will become more and more of a factor in future elections. They do vote and they vote Dem in greater numbers than they vote GOP. Same for Hispanics. In the meantime your AWG's are reaching their sell by date and no longer participating in elections. Males die before females and the shifting demographics are a ticking clock that you can't stop.

From the US Census;

http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1141.pdf

CONCLUSION
The baby boom cohort will experience
a substantial decline in the
coming decades. The population
in the baby boom ages has been
decreasing in size since 2012, and
that pace of decline is expected
to accelerate as the baby boomers
grow older. When the first baby
boomers turned 65 in 2011, there
were just under 77 million baby
boomers in the population. By
2030, when the baby boomers will
be between 66 and 84 years old,
that number is projected to drop to
60 million and decrease further by
2060 to only 2.4 million. ​

Note that those numbers include minorities. Take out the minorities and whites who vote Dem and you cannot win an election with a dwindling voter base of AWG's. In the meantime the Millennials increase as a voting bloc and minorities have children who become registered voters and the GOP is left with a base that is dying off and nothing to offer that will attract voters to join the ranks of bitter old AWG's.

No girlfriend. Read again. Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.


The reality is the Democrat Party is rapidly losing white voters. That has been accelerating. Again....that cannot be argued. It is tough for Dems to win elections when almost 2 out of every 3 whites vote against them. The erosion of black and Millennial voters for the Democrat Party can also not be argued. Facts are facts. Sorry.

There is a reason the Dems lost so badly last month. They have a major problem with white voters and they are seeing a real erosion among the young and minorities.

The Democrat Party is in trouble right now. If they do not find a way to shore up their base and gain white support they will continue to struggle. Last month the GOP got an aggregate 4.5-5% more votes overall than Dems. No way to spin that in a positive way. There is also no way to suggest the Dems are in a great position in 2016.

Additionally, your census data is a non sequitur. It says absolutely nothing about how people are voting. My data speaks to exactly how people are voting. Even you must understand the difference. Voting blocs are changing. Census data says nothing about those changes. Again....your post = fail.

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Yeah cause Millennials will never grow up to stand for personal responsibility, hard work, and success!

And yet 2014 was the best year for job growth since 1999. Thank you, President Obama.

2014 is Best Year for Job Gains Since 1999 whotv.com

That's nice. Yet median family income has declined every year since 1999. 8.7% to be precise. The average American is worse off under Obama. That cannot be argued.

Second....the worker participation rate is the lowest it's been since the late 1970's. Again....that cannot be argued.

The phony unemployment numbers hide those key facts. Hence, the reason why Obama's approval numbers are so low and right track worng track number is so low. Americans are not stupid. They know if their lives are getting better or not.

Pesky facts again.....


Oh...and btw....the GOP just picked up another House seat. Tell us again how great things are for the Dems.

Republican wins Arizona House seat after recount - Yahoo News

Blaming Obama for Republican anti middle class policies that gave massive taxcuts to the 1% doesn't fly anymore.

Everyone knows that the GOP doesn't create jobs or even care. They want to repeal the ACA and make life more difficult for hardworking Americans.

Once again time will tell between now and 2016 if the GOP is going to do anything at all to help them out. My money is on them doing nothing because they want a bad economy so that they blame Obama and take over the Whitehouse in 2016. Wouldn't surprise me in the least if they pass a poisoned budget bill that Obama will have no option but to veto between now and then and they will blame him for "shutting down the government" again.

The American voters, especially the Millennials, are wise to this TP BS.

Try it and see how it works for you in 2016. I dare you.

 

[daws101]

That is a single snapshot for an off year election with a low voter turnout.

Here is what is happening long term demographically;

How bad is the Republicans demographic problem See for yourself Interactive - Yahoo News

View attachment 35076

Those settings are based on the Census Bureau population estimates.

Even though whites might be moving towards the GOP that only applies to the seniors. The Millennial generation isn't following them, rather it is headed towards the Dems since that is a better reflection of themselves.

So you can clearly see that 2016 is going to be a rough year for the GOP which is why they have drafted in Jeb Bush. He is an establishment candidate with strong Hispanic ties and moderate views. If he can avoid having to take an extremist rightwing running mate he might just make it but he will be the underdog in the race.

Furthermore look at what is about to happen in 2015. The Republicans have no choice but to come up with an Immigration bill. Failure to do so will mean that Obama's EO will be in effect. The TP'ers won't vote for a moderate rational bill which means they will be a major PR problem when it comes to passing Immigration Reform. If the GOP does pass a bill that harms Hispanics then Obama can veto it and look like a hero.

In essence it doesn't matter how many AWG's you have on your side they are not enough to beat the Dems. Republicans have to slap the TP'ers down and move to the center if they want to stand a chance in 2016 and beyond.

No.....the demographic trend is definitely against the Dems. The facts are not on your side. To dismiss the severe beating the Dems just took as the result of an off year election does not conform to the facts.

1. Per the AP....The Democrat Party has lost 10% of the white vote since 2008. That is a massive loss that cannot be easily replaced.

2. Less than 1 in 3 white men now vote Democrat.

3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.

4. The black vote is also beginning to erode for the Democrat Party per the Washington Post and other sources. Democrats lost 4% of the black vote from 2012 and 2% from the last off year election.

Republicans won 10 percent of the black vote on Tuesday. That 8217 s actually a step in the right direction. - The Washington Post


Key quote:

"In North Carolina, 54 percent of millennials chose Democratic nominee Sen. Kay Hagan -- who won 71 percent of the youth vote in 2008 -- but she lost to Republican state House Speaker Thom Tillis. In Georgia, 59 percent of the youth voted for Democratic candidate Michelle Nunn. But she ultimately lost to Republican candidate David Perdue, who received 39 percent of the youth vote.

In Iowa, Democrat Rep. Bruce Braley received 54 percent of millennials' votes, but lost overall to Republican Sen. Joni Ernst."


Election Results 2014 Most Millennials Voted Democrat But It Didn t Make A Difference In Some Senate Races


The Dems are rapidly losing white voters. They have lost white men....maybe forever. The erosion of support among black voters and the young would have to be very concerning.

Still drowning in denial or do you just have a serious comprehension problem with your own link?

There was an INCREASE in millennial participation in spite of it being an off year election with record low turnout.

Millennials comprised 13 percent of voters, 1 percentage point higher than in 2010, when youth voters made up 12 percent of the electorate.

That means that as Millennials grow older (the majority of them are now of voting age and the oldest will be 38 in 2016) they will become more and more of a factor in future elections. They do vote and they vote Dem in greater numbers than they vote GOP. Same for Hispanics. In the meantime your AWG's are reaching their sell by date and no longer participating in elections. Males die before females and the shifting demographics are a ticking clock that you can't stop.

From the US Census;

http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1141.pdf

CONCLUSION
The baby boom cohort will experience
a substantial decline in the
coming decades. The population
in the baby boom ages has been
decreasing in size since 2012, and
that pace of decline is expected
to accelerate as the baby boomers
grow older. When the first baby
boomers turned 65 in 2011, there
were just under 77 million baby
boomers in the population. By
2030, when the baby boomers will
be between 66 and 84 years old,
that number is projected to drop to
60 million and decrease further by
2060 to only 2.4 million. ​

Note that those numbers include minorities. Take out the minorities and whites who vote Dem and you cannot win an election with a dwindling voter base of AWG's. In the meantime the Millennials increase as a voting bloc and minorities have children who become registered voters and the GOP is left with a base that is dying off and nothing to offer that will attract voters to join the ranks of bitter old AWG's.

No girlfriend. Read again. Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.


The reality is the Democrat Party is rapidly losing white voters. That has been accelerating. Again....that cannot be argued. It is tough for Dems to win elections when almost 2 out of every 3 whites vote against them. The erosion of black and Millennial voters for the Democrat Party can also not be argued. Facts are facts. Sorry.

There is a reason the Dems lost so badly last month. They have a major problem with white voters and they are seeing a real erosion among the young and minorities.

The Democrat Party is in trouble right now. If they do not find a way to shore up their base and gain white support they will continue to struggle. Last month the GOP got an aggregate 4.5-5% more votes overall than Dems. No way to spin that in a positive way. There is also no way to suggest the Dems are in a great position in 2016.

Additionally, your census data is a non sequitur. It says absolutely nothing about how people are voting. My data speaks to exactly how people are voting. Even you must understand the difference. Voting blocs are changing. Census data says nothing about those changes. Again....your post = fail.

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Yeah cause Millennials will never grow up to stand for personal responsibility, hard work, and success!

right! from your posts it appears you've never taken personally responsibility in your life.
making assumptions based on your prejudices proves that.

 

[daws101]

I really thought Politico was joking when they ran a story recently saying this man, this idiot, Ted Cruz, would run for President of the United States. It’s beyond belief that he really feels he could become President. In the first place, he was born in a foreign country (Canada). If Republicans believe Hawaii is a foreign country, or an annexation of it, or part of Kenya, then they can’t possibly believe that Canada is a US State. Then there is the matter of Ted Cruz being stupid as fuck.
Which brings up this point:
Republicans in general are stupid as fuck. I realized this today when reading about what they think about net neutrality. They are also as dishonest as fuck.

Ted Cruz

Please provide the class your evidence for the generalization that Republicans in general are stupid as fuck. Or are you just dumb ass troll?

nuff said.

wow.. you libs are soooooo damn retarded.

FYI Billy the liar is nothing but a comedian and clearly he knows nothing about the UK.

thanks for once again proving beyond doubt you are3 as stupid as fuck, as to bill Maher and England he is just as savvy to their politics as he is ours .
you know that if you weren't dumb as fuck.

ROFL your idea of savy is a quite literally a joke.

really? love to watch you show your ignorance!

 

[daws101]

This is the GOP Presidential hopeful.....you can't get any dumber than this guy. I'm sure in his mind he thought he was doing something spectacular for the Republican Party and would be greatly rewarded.....instead he has angered a few of his peers. And for what?


In a rare Saturday session, the United States Senate ended up passing the $1.1 Trillion spending package that will keep most of the Federal Government funded through the end of the Fiscal Year, but not before a late Friday night political manuver by Texas Senator Ted Cruz allowed Democrats to spend most of Saturday easily confirming nominations that Republicans had long been blocking:

The vote concluded a long day of brinkmanship, spurred by a legislative challenge to Mr. Obama’s executive action on immigration by Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, who helped force the Senate into a weekend session. By the end of the day, Mr. Cruz found himself isolated even from members of his own party.

“I don’t see what we’re achieving here,” Senator Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, said of Mr. Cruz’s strategy.

Speaking of symbolic standoffs, it was thanks largely to an effort by Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee to create a symbolic standoff on the immigration issue that Democrats were able to spend the better part of yesterday pushing through a whole host of nomination that had been bottle necked for months:

Senior Republicans say there’s a problem with Cruz’s strategy: The GOP lacks the votes to stop Obama on immigration now, the $1.1 trillion spending package was speeding to passage, and they won’t resort to shutting down the government to mount their objections. Plus, the weekend session could allow Obama to get even more of his nominees confirmed.

So while Cruz and Lee argue they’re taking a hard stand against Obama, the result might allow Democrats to end the year with more of their priorities advanced — and the two conservatives getting nothing.


Senate Passes Spending Bill As Ted Cruz Maneuver Helps Democrats Pass Nominations

If he helps you chaps anymore, the Democratic Party will be extinct.

wake up pop, you're having that dream again.

 

[RKMBrown]

No.....the demographic trend is definitely against the Dems. The facts are not on your side. To dismiss the severe beating the Dems just took as the result of an off year election does not conform to the facts.

1. Per the AP....The Democrat Party has lost 10% of the white vote since 2008. That is a massive loss that cannot be easily replaced.

2. Less than 1 in 3 white men now vote Democrat.

3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.

4. The black vote is also beginning to erode for the Democrat Party per the Washington Post and other sources. Democrats lost 4% of the black vote from 2012 and 2% from the last off year election.

Republicans won 10 percent of the black vote on Tuesday. That 8217 s actually a step in the right direction. - The Washington Post


Key quote:

"In North Carolina, 54 percent of millennials chose Democratic nominee Sen. Kay Hagan -- who won 71 percent of the youth vote in 2008 -- but she lost to Republican state House Speaker Thom Tillis. In Georgia, 59 percent of the youth voted for Democratic candidate Michelle Nunn. But she ultimately lost to Republican candidate David Perdue, who received 39 percent of the youth vote.

In Iowa, Democrat Rep. Bruce Braley received 54 percent of millennials' votes, but lost overall to Republican Sen. Joni Ernst."


Election Results 2014 Most Millennials Voted Democrat But It Didn t Make A Difference In Some Senate Races


The Dems are rapidly losing white voters. They have lost white men....maybe forever. The erosion of support among black voters and the young would have to be very concerning.

Still drowning in denial or do you just have a serious comprehension problem with your own link?

There was an INCREASE in millennial participation in spite of it being an off year election with record low turnout.

Millennials comprised 13 percent of voters, 1 percentage point higher than in 2010, when youth voters made up 12 percent of the electorate.

That means that as Millennials grow older (the majority of them are now of voting age and the oldest will be 38 in 2016) they will become more and more of a factor in future elections. They do vote and they vote Dem in greater numbers than they vote GOP. Same for Hispanics. In the meantime your AWG's are reaching their sell by date and no longer participating in elections. Males die before females and the shifting demographics are a ticking clock that you can't stop.

From the US Census;

http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1141.pdf

CONCLUSION
The baby boom cohort will experience
a substantial decline in the
coming decades. The population
in the baby boom ages has been
decreasing in size since 2012, and
that pace of decline is expected
to accelerate as the baby boomers
grow older. When the first baby
boomers turned 65 in 2011, there
were just under 77 million baby
boomers in the population. By
2030, when the baby boomers will
be between 66 and 84 years old,
that number is projected to drop to
60 million and decrease further by
2060 to only 2.4 million. ​

Note that those numbers include minorities. Take out the minorities and whites who vote Dem and you cannot win an election with a dwindling voter base of AWG's. In the meantime the Millennials increase as a voting bloc and minorities have children who become registered voters and the GOP is left with a base that is dying off and nothing to offer that will attract voters to join the ranks of bitter old AWG's.

No girlfriend. Read again. Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.


The reality is the Democrat Party is rapidly losing white voters. That has been accelerating. Again....that cannot be argued. It is tough for Dems to win elections when almost 2 out of every 3 whites vote against them. The erosion of black and Millennial voters for the Democrat Party can also not be argued. Facts are facts. Sorry.

There is a reason the Dems lost so badly last month. They have a major problem with white voters and they are seeing a real erosion among the young and minorities.

The Democrat Party is in trouble right now. If they do not find a way to shore up their base and gain white support they will continue to struggle. Last month the GOP got an aggregate 4.5-5% more votes overall than Dems. No way to spin that in a positive way. There is also no way to suggest the Dems are in a great position in 2016.

Additionally, your census data is a non sequitur. It says absolutely nothing about how people are voting. My data speaks to exactly how people are voting. Even you must understand the difference. Voting blocs are changing. Census data says nothing about those changes. Again....your post = fail.

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Yeah cause Millennials will never grow up to stand for personal responsibility, hard work, and success!

right! from your posts it appears you've never taken personally responsibility in your life.
making assumptions based on your prejudices proves that.

Need a tissue, ya pussy?

 

[daws101]

Still drowning in denial or do you just have a serious comprehension problem with your own link?

There was an INCREASE in millennial participation in spite of it being an off year election with record low turnout.

Millennials comprised 13 percent of voters, 1 percentage point higher than in 2010, when youth voters made up 12 percent of the electorate.

That means that as Millennials grow older (the majority of them are now of voting age and the oldest will be 38 in 2016) they will become more and more of a factor in future elections. They do vote and they vote Dem in greater numbers than they vote GOP. Same for Hispanics. In the meantime your AWG's are reaching their sell by date and no longer participating in elections. Males die before females and the shifting demographics are a ticking clock that you can't stop.

From the US Census;

http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1141.pdf

CONCLUSION
The baby boom cohort will experience
a substantial decline in the
coming decades. The population
in the baby boom ages has been
decreasing in size since 2012, and
that pace of decline is expected
to accelerate as the baby boomers
grow older. When the first baby
boomers turned 65 in 2011, there
were just under 77 million baby
boomers in the population. By
2030, when the baby boomers will
be between 66 and 84 years old,
that number is projected to drop to
60 million and decrease further by
2060 to only 2.4 million. ​

Note that those numbers include minorities. Take out the minorities and whites who vote Dem and you cannot win an election with a dwindling voter base of AWG's. In the meantime the Millennials increase as a voting bloc and minorities have children who become registered voters and the GOP is left with a base that is dying off and nothing to offer that will attract voters to join the ranks of bitter old AWG's.

No girlfriend. Read again. Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.


The reality is the Democrat Party is rapidly losing white voters. That has been accelerating. Again....that cannot be argued. It is tough for Dems to win elections when almost 2 out of every 3 whites vote against them. The erosion of black and Millennial voters for the Democrat Party can also not be argued. Facts are facts. Sorry.

There is a reason the Dems lost so badly last month. They have a major problem with white voters and they are seeing a real erosion among the young and minorities.

The Democrat Party is in trouble right now. If they do not find a way to shore up their base and gain white support they will continue to struggle. Last month the GOP got an aggregate 4.5-5% more votes overall than Dems. No way to spin that in a positive way. There is also no way to suggest the Dems are in a great position in 2016.

Additionally, your census data is a non sequitur. It says absolutely nothing about how people are voting. My data speaks to exactly how people are voting. Even you must understand the difference. Voting blocs are changing. Census data says nothing about those changes. Again....your post = fail.

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Yeah cause Millennials will never grow up to stand for personal responsibility, hard work, and success!

right! from your posts it appears you've never taken personally responsibility in your life.
making assumptions based on your prejudices proves that.

Need a tissue, ya pussy?

judging from that lame ass retort the chicken shit here is you.

 

[RKMBrown]

No girlfriend. Read again. Kay Hagan lost 17% of the Millennial vote per the Washington Post from the 2008 election. Many other Senate candidates lost a similar amount. This is the precise data from the link provided. It cannot be argued. Facts are facts.


3. The Millennial support for the Democrat Party dropped 9% from the 2012 election. Young people are starting to move away from the Democrat Party. Their support dropped 4% from the last off year election in 2010.


The reality is the Democrat Party is rapidly losing white voters. That has been accelerating. Again....that cannot be argued. It is tough for Dems to win elections when almost 2 out of every 3 whites vote against them. The erosion of black and Millennial voters for the Democrat Party can also not be argued. Facts are facts. Sorry.

There is a reason the Dems lost so badly last month. They have a major problem with white voters and they are seeing a real erosion among the young and minorities.

The Democrat Party is in trouble right now. If they do not find a way to shore up their base and gain white support they will continue to struggle. Last month the GOP got an aggregate 4.5-5% more votes overall than Dems. No way to spin that in a positive way. There is also no way to suggest the Dems are in a great position in 2016.

Additionally, your census data is a non sequitur. It says absolutely nothing about how people are voting. My data speaks to exactly how people are voting. Even you must understand the difference. Voting blocs are changing. Census data says nothing about those changes. Again....your post = fail.

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Yeah cause Millennials will never grow up to stand for personal responsibility, hard work, and success!

right! from your posts it appears you've never taken personally responsibility in your life.
making assumptions based on your prejudices proves that.

Need a tissue, ya pussy?

judging from that lame ass retort the chicken shit here is you.

Ass hole claims millennials are opposed to everything the extreme right stands for, and you defend that shit? The extreme right stands for morality. The extreme right stands for liberty. The extreme right stands for "family values." The extreme right stands for the American Constitution. You think millennials are opposed to these things you effing retard?

 

[Derideo_Te]

claims millennials are opposed to everything the extreme right stands for, and you defend that shit?

 

[daws101]

What a dilemma?

Who is more credible?

The US Census data that has no bias or WQ who is basing everything on a single election with a record low voter turnout that favored the right?

Actually this is all pointless because no matter how many aging AWG's vote GOP they are already a dwindling minority while the left leaning Millennials are a growing demographic with a majority that are opposed to everything that the extreme right stands for.

So this is moot. Time will prove WQ is just whistling past the graveyard. He cannot win no matter how much he denies the demographic data.

Yeah cause Millennials will never grow up to stand for personal responsibility, hard work, and success!

right! from your posts it appears you've never taken personally responsibility in your life.
making assumptions based on your prejudices proves that.

Need a tissue, ya pussy?

judging from that lame ass retort the chicken shit here is you.

Ass hole claims millennials are opposed to everything the extreme right stands for, and you defend that shit? The extreme right stands for morality. The extreme right stands for liberty. The extreme right stands for "family values." The extreme right stands for the American Constitution. You think millennials are opposed to these things you effing retard?

I did'nt think a response could be more lame then the last one. but.......the extreme right stands for a perverted, twisted, dumb downed fascist version of all of that.

 

[RKMBrown]

claims millennials are opposed to everything the extreme right stands for, and you defend that shit?

Ted Cruz Unwittingly Helps Democrats Page 16 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
clue: the part with millennials

 

[RKMBrown]

Yeah cause Millennials will never grow up to stand for personal responsibility, hard work, and success!

right! from your posts it appears you've never taken personally responsibility in your life.
making assumptions based on your prejudices proves that.

Need a tissue, ya pussy?

judging from that lame ass retort the chicken shit here is you.

Ass hole claims millennials are opposed to everything the extreme right stands for, and you defend that shit? The extreme right stands for morality. The extreme right stands for liberty. The extreme right stands for "family values." The extreme right stands for the American Constitution. You think millennials are opposed to these things you effing retard?

I did'nt think a response could be more lame then the last one. but.......the extreme right stands for a perverted, twisted, dumb downed fascist version of all of that.

You're a deviant POS ass hole.

 

[daws101]

right! from your posts it appears you've never taken personally responsibility in your life.
making assumptions based on your prejudices proves that.

Need a tissue, ya pussy?

judging from that lame ass retort the chicken shit here is you.

Ass hole claims millennials are opposed to everything the extreme right stands for, and you defend that shit? The extreme right stands for morality. The extreme right stands for liberty. The extreme right stands for "family values." The extreme right stands for the American Constitution. You think millennials are opposed to these things you effing retard?

I did'nt think a response could be more lame then the last one. but.......the extreme right stands for a perverted, twisted, dumb downed fascist version of all of that.

You're a deviant POS ass hole.

sorry to burst your bubble but it's you who is a deviant even your avatar would find you extreme

 

[RKMBrown]

Need a tissue, ya pussy?

judging from that lame ass retort the chicken shit here is you.

Ass hole claims millennials are opposed to everything the extreme right stands for, and you defend that shit? The extreme right stands for morality. The extreme right stands for liberty. The extreme right stands for "family values." The extreme right stands for the American Constitution. You think millennials are opposed to these things you effing retard?

I did'nt think a response could be more lame then the last one. but.......the extreme right stands for a perverted, twisted, dumb downed fascist version of all of that.

You're a deviant POS ass hole.

sorry to burst your bubble but it's you who is a deviant even your avatar would find you extreme

ROFL yeah I'm "extreme" because I disagree with your point that "millennials are opposed to everything the extreme right stands for." ROFL You're a moron.