Ted Cruz destroys.
- Thread starter Theowl32
- Start date
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Facebook, Twitter, and Google because of their lopsided censorship need to be declared Political Operatves, and have their classifications changed as to the way their funding streams are monitored, and as to how they are taxed and regulated. It's clear they are deeply involved in Partisan Politics, and are using their vehicle as a Propaganda Platform to the detriment of Free Speech and Equal Time for Dissenting Viewpoints.
TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #4
Lyin’ Ted isn’t even a citizen. Who the fuck is he to question an American?
conserveguy877
Gold Member
- Nov 25, 2015
- 6,941
- 3,219
- 290
Ted.
TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 42,086
- 59,326
- 3,615
Ted Zeppelin is Awesome
Crixus
Gold Member
Who the fuck are you to question the question? No one elected you. What makes you a judge? Fucking plonker.
francoHFW
Diamond Member
There is a huge problem with GOP fake news and hate speech. Just listen to Fox News and Rush etc etc. So much pure crap about Democrats and the news....
TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #12
It was good enough to trigger 2 of you bitchass losers
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
The funny part is I think that Zuckerberg actually believes what he is saying.
francoHFW
Diamond Member
Thank you scumbag GOP and silly ignorant DukDu 4 Wrecking the middle class and the country the last 35 years.
Numbers.
Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/usper
Numbers.
Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/usper
Reasonable
Gold Member
- Feb 9, 2017
- 19,787
- 2,401
- 290
- Banned
- #16
Cruz is an asshole and the most hated man in Congress. He sacrificed his manhood for Trump after the orange worm criticized his wife and made up lies about his father.
The less this vermin is brought to public attention, the better.
Check out fat Ted getting punked by what he thinks is a fan. Ha ha. She opened up her coat right before the photo was taken.
Reasonable
Gold Member
- Feb 9, 2017
- 19,787
- 2,401
- 290
- Banned
- #17
Great drinking game. Anytime a member of the Trump cult says the word COMMIE, everyone takes a shot of whisky.
conserveguy877
Gold Member
- Nov 25, 2015
- 6,941
- 3,219
- 290
Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Who is he to question an American? He's a sitting US Senator, that's who.
Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
You clearly wouldn't know a Nazi if one crawled up your pants leg.
Similar threads
