Teabagger!

[Howey]

I thought I posted this earlier but can't find it now. There's quite a bit of confusion going on here about how and when the right started using the term "teabagger".

To clear the confusion and to not muddy up a troll thread, I thought I'd post this here.

Moreover, as Jay Nordlinger at National Review admits, the term "teabagger" was introduced to the political lexicon by Tea Party movement leaders:

The first big day for this movement was Tax Day, April 15. And organizers had a gimmick. They asked people to send a tea bag to the Oval Office. One of the exhortations was “Tea Bag the Fools in D.C.” A protester was spotted with a sign saying, “Tea Bag the Liberal Dems Before They Tea Bag You.” So, conservatives started it: started with this terminology. But others ran with it and ran with it.

Tommy Christopher at Mediaite has it about right:

The origin of the term is relevant in determining the relative size of the Tea Party’s violin. What wasn’t pointed out to Tapper is the fact that the Tea Partiers not only invented the term, they did so in order to inflict a similar double entendre onto the President, the Democrats, and liberals in general. Hence, it’s a violin so small, you need an electron microscope with a zoom lens to see it.

Now, they’re trying to re-cast the term as a slur, on a par with the “n-word,” hurtful to all the Tea Party members who are just ordinary moms, dads, sons, and daughters. The latter point has some resonance, but the former is ridiculous in the extreme.

In emails, protest signs, t-shirts, and online, early Tea Party literature urged protesters to “Tea Bag the White House,” and to “Tea-bag the liberal Dems before they tea-bag you.” The suggestion is that the metaphoric “tea-bags” be shoved in the mouths of the President, Democratic members of Congress, and even ordinary citizens who identify as liberal Democrats. The idea that they just didn’t know the term’s only (at that time) meaning is belied by the fact that they obviously knew it was negative (and non-consensual), since they didn’t want it done to them, and also because it only had one meaning.

It was only after MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and David Shuster, and CNN’s Anderson Cooper, turned the tables on the term that Tea Partiers objected. They were perfectly satisfied to advocate the metaphoric mouth-rape of liberal men, women, and children, but had the nerve to become indignant when the insult boomeranged on them.

Links to comments referenced are available at the link. I hope this clears the matter up.

 

[birddog]

DUH! It's not as big a deal as most libs make it in their attempts to deflect from the great, patriotic Tea Party message, but using the expression "Tea bag" is different than called someone a "Teabagger" with the intent to belittle!

 

[rdean]

DUH! It's not as big a deal as most libs make it in their attempts to deflect from the great, patriotic Tea Party message, but using the expression "Tea bag" is different than called someone a "Teabagger" with the intent to belittle!

Patriotic?

 

[birddog]

DUH! It's not as big a deal as most libs make it in their attempts to deflect from the great, patriotic Tea Party message, but using the expression "Tea bag" is different than called someone a "Teabagger" with the intent to belittle!

Patriotic?

Darn right! Try it some time, you might like it.