What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tea Party Rep: Bank Should Have Known I Wouldn't Be Able To Repay $2.2 Million Loan

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
60,740
Reaction score
18,130
Points
2,180
Location
Exposing PoliticalChic as a fraud. Every day.
Tea Party Rep: Bank Should Have Known I Wouldn't Be Able To Repay $2.2 Million Loan



Tea Party aligned Georgia Rep. Tom Graves (R), who castigates Washington for fiscal irresponsibility, reached an out of court settlement Wednesday after he was sued for defaulting on a $2.2 million loan -- which his attorney argued is the bank's fault for lending him the money in the first place.


Graves and his business partner Chip Rogers -- who is the state Senate's Republican majority leader -- took out a $2.2 million loan from the Bartow County Bank in 2007 to buy and renovate a local motel. The project soon went belly-up.


The bank, which has since failed and had its assets taken over, sued Graves and Rogers for defaulting. The two Republicans then countersued, "accusing [the bank] of improperly declaring the loan in default after reneging on a promise to refinance it at more favorable terms," according to Jeremy Redmon and Aaron Gould Sheinin of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution .


In June, Simon Bloom, the attorney for Graves and Rogers, argued in a court filing that the default was the bank's fault because it lent the pair the money knowing full well they couldn't pay. Bloom cited a deposition in which bank officials saw Graves and Rogers' financial records, and then had them sign personal guarantees so they'd "'have some skin in the game' presumably meaning a sense of personal obligation for the debts ... even though they clearly could not fulfill the obligation." Graves and Rogers said they were unaware of that particular filing.


*snip*


Another teabagging DEADBEAT! And all you fools want to follow these jackoffs?
 
R

rdean

Guest
Which is worse. 2.2 million lost from a bank or 117 thousand in back child support for your own three kids you used in an ad to attack Obama?
 
OP
Synthaholic

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
60,740
Reaction score
18,130
Points
2,180
Location
Exposing PoliticalChic as a fraud. Every day.
Which is worse. 2.2 million lost from a bank or 117 thousand in back child support for your own three kids you used in an ad to attack Obama?
They are both teabagging fuckwads.
 

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

Forum List

Top