Is it true the republican party has been caught cheating?

Truthmatters

Rookie
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,263
Points
0
It is court documented the republican party cheats in elections

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the proof list is very very long




http://personalliberty.com/2009/12/0...cree-19493836/




Judge Denies Republicans' Effort To End Voter Intimidation Consent Decree


December 9, 2009 by Personal Liberty News Desk

Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey rejected an attempt by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to dissolve a 27-year-old court order that is intended to prevent the intimidation of minority voters.

Stemming from a lawsuit brought forth by the Democratic National Committee in 1982, a consent decree was agreed upon which forced the RNC to gain court approval to use certain election tactics, including the creation of voter challenge lists, photographing voters at the polls and posting off-duty police at voting locations in minority neighborhoods, according to The New York Times.









http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida...ns.2C_lawsuits



In June 2001, The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights released a report and statements[15][16] arguing that Florida was, on numerous counts, in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and recommending:
On 1 count that "The U.S. Department of Justice should immediately initiate the litigation process against the governor, secretary of state, director of the Division of Elections, specific supervisors of elections, and other state and local officials responsible for the execution of election laws, practices, and procedures..."
On 1 count that "The U.S. Department of Justice should initiate the litigation process against the governor..."
On 1 count that "The U.S. Department of Justice should initiate the litigation process against the secretary of State..."
On 12 counts that "The U.S. Department of Justice and the Civil Rights Division in the Office of the Florida Attorney General should initiate the litigation process against state election officials..."
...And so on, totaling 20 recommendations involving the phrase "should initiate the litigation process" or "should immediately initiate the litigation process"
(See also THE 2000 VOTE AND ELECTION REFORM)
On February, 2002, the NAACP and four other groups filed suit against Harris (NAACP v. Harris), a former state election chief, and the county elections supervisor.[17] The lawsuit cites the state, several counties and the contractor over procedures for voter registration, voter lists and balloting. The suit charges that Black voters were disenfranchised during the 2000 presidential election, and argued that Florida was in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the US Constitution's Equal Protection Amendment. The parties reached a settlement wherein ChoicePoint will donate $75,000 to the NAACP and will reprocess the voter file on the plaintiffs' terms.[18][19]

In August, 2002, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights released a briefing summary regarding the progress of voting rights in Florida










http://articles.latimes.com/1986-10-...onal-committee


In an Aug. 13 memo the court made public Friday, Kris Wolfe, the Republican National Committee Midwest political director, wrote Lanny Griffith, the committee's Southern political director, and said of the Louisiana campaigning:

"I know this race is really important to you. I would guess that this program will eliminate at least 60-80,000 folks from the rolls. . . . If it's a close race . . . which I'm assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably."

Unseals Document

She said in the memorandum that the program had been approved by Gregory Graves, deputy political director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

The document, called Exhibit 13, was unsealed by U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise when lawyers for the Democratic National Committee said it was needed to question Wolfe.

Wolfe testified that she wrote about the possibility of keeping the black vote down to remind Griffith that there "might be a political situation he might want to consider. . . . I wanted him to be aware of the political considerations."

The Democrats are suing the Republican Party for $10 million, charging that the Republican National Committee ballot security programs--a method of assuring that voters reside at their listed addresses--violated a 1981 consent agreement signed by both parties.






court documented right from the very top of the republican party














http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Ne...amming_scandal


2002 New Hampshire Senate election phone jamming scandal

The 2002 New Hampshire Senate election phone jamming scandal involves the use of a telemarketing firm hired by that state's Republican Party (NHGOP) for election tampering. The tampering involved using a call center to jam the phone lines of a Get Out the Vote (GOTV) operation. In the end, 900 calls were made for 45 minutes of disruption to the Democratic-leaning call centers.

During that state's 2002 election for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Robert C. Smith, the NHGOP hired GOP Marketplace, based in Northern Virginia, to jam another phone bank being used by the state Democratic Party and the firefighters' union for efforts to turn out voters on behalf of then-governor Jeanne Shaheen on Election Day. John E. Sununu, the Republican candidate, won a narrow victory. In addition to criminal prosecutions, disclosures in the case have come from a civil suit filed by the state's Democratic Party against the state's Republican Party (now settled).







Charles McGee served seven months in prison, and now works at campaign school for GOP candidates, run by a Republican political marketing firm.[39]
 

OODA_Loop

Account Terminated
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,494
Reaction score
676
Points
175
Location
Lubyanka
Eligible voter lists and posted off-duty police as security

The humanity.
 
OP
Truthmatters

Truthmatters

Rookie
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,263
Points
0
Oh goody! Another Partisan thread where the OP thinks their side doesn't do it...ANYONE caught cheating should be drawn and quartered period.
where did I say the republican never cheat?


you got that from an old thread that was retitled by the long gone mods of the OLD owner who would change the titles of my threads huh?


I never said that
 
OP
Truthmatters

Truthmatters

Rookie
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,263
Points
0
every one of those cases I posted there is completely court documented.

You know COURT!

you know JUDGES

YOU know EVIDENCE



you cant pretend the courts of our country don't matter.

Its like saying NO ONE should ever go to jail
 

OODA_Loop

Account Terminated
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,494
Reaction score
676
Points
175
Location
Lubyanka
every one of those cases I posted there is completely court documented.

You know COURT!

you know JUDGES

YOU know EVIDENCE



you cant pretend the courts of our country don't matter.

Its like saying NO ONE should ever go to jail
Yet no injunctions.
 

JakeStarkey

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
168,039
Reaction score
16,430
Points
2,165
Dopey OP.

Both parties cheat all the time.
 
OP
Truthmatters

Truthmatters

Rookie
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,263
Points
0
Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times


as a matter of fact just last year ( 1/13) the scotus told the courts to just keep punishing the republican party for cheating
for decades the republican party has been under a consent decree that means they CAN NOT DO VOTER PURGES.


that is an injunction


why cant they?


because they have been caught repeatedly cheating particularly black voters out of their votes.


As in CHEATING these voters in some way to strip them of a vote they are legally allowed to cast.

You know TREASON!
 
OP
Truthmatters

Truthmatters

Rookie
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,263
Points
0
Dopey OP.

Both parties cheat all the time.
Oh awesome this should be fun then

how about you and me team together and EXPOSE elections cheating no matter where it comes from.

You do the dems

ill do the republicans.

Im being nice and giving you the easy case
 
OP
Truthmatters

Truthmatters

Rookie
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,263
Points
0
do you want to start a separate thread?

Or should I start one we will both place our cases in for comparison?
 

OODA_Loop

Account Terminated
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,494
Reaction score
676
Points
175
Location
Lubyanka
Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times


as a matter of fact just last year ( 1/13) the scotus told the courts to just keep punishing the republican party for cheating
for decades the republican party has been under a consent decree that means they CAN NOT DO VOTER PURGES.


that is an injunction


why cant they?


because they have been caught repeatedly cheating particularly black voters out of their votes.


As in CHEATING these voters in some way to strip them of a vote they are legally allowed to cast.

You know TREASON!
The RNC agreed and is under the dissent decree voluntarily and it is over 30 years old.
 

Yurt

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Messages
25,603
Reaction score
3,601
Points
270
Location
Hot air ballon
OP
Truthmatters

Truthmatters

Rookie
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,263
Points
0
Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times


as a matter of fact just last year ( 1/13) the scotus told the courts to just keep punishing the republican party for cheating
for decades the republican party has been under a consent decree that means they CAN NOT DO VOTER PURGES.


that is an injunction


why cant they?


because they have been caught repeatedly cheating particularly black voters out of their votes.


As in CHEATING these voters in some way to strip them of a vote they are legally allowed to cast.

You know TREASON!
The RNC agreed and is under the dissent decree voluntarily and it is over 30 years old.
how kind of them what was their other legal option at the time?
 

OODA_Loop

Account Terminated
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,494
Reaction score
676
Points
175
Location
Lubyanka
for decades the republican party has been under a consent decree that means they CAN NOT DO VOTER PURGES.


that is an injunction


why cant they?


because they have been caught repeatedly cheating particularly black voters out of their votes.


As in CHEATING these voters in some way to strip them of a vote they are legally allowed to cast.

You know TREASON!
The RNC agreed and is under the dissent decree voluntarily and it is over 30 years old.
how kind of them what was their other legal option at the time?
Fight it. But to prove there was no malintent they did it voluntarily.
 
Last edited:

Yurt

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Messages
25,603
Reaction score
3,601
Points
270
Location
Hot air ballon
the case stems from an incident 30 years ago you dishonest dummy
 

Yurt

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Messages
25,603
Reaction score
3,601
Points
270
Location
Hot air ballon

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top