Sydney Sweeney is a pretty young lady.

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
129,569
Reaction score
185,621
Points
3,635
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
How in the world is that political, you might ask? It's because that otherwise benign commericial that she's in sparked YET ANOTHER racially-charged, politically-charged firestorm that originated on the Left. I wish the entire Left would read this piece in Politico today: The Sydney Sweeney Saga Shows Why Republicans Keep Winning -- written by a Democrat and Harris campaign worker.

For the blissfully uninitiated: The actress Sydney Sweeney was the face of a new ad for American Eagle where they say she has “good jeans.” This is obviously a play on “good genes,” which to most people was a reference to how she is good looking, and to a small cadre of extremely online lefty posters and SEO-chasing online media outlets was a reference to Nazism and eugenics. The right made a whole thing about it, accusing Democrats of being out-of-touch scolds, and somehow Democrats have found themselves on the defensive. The episode caused confusion, consternation and a wave of Democrats performatively affirming that yes, they too think Sydney Sweeney is beautiful. Welcome to 2025.

You might be wondering why anybody cares about this. But here’s the thing: The fact that this moment became a thing at all — that a stupid pun could metastasize into a full-blown political moment — says something real about the media ecosystem we’re all trapped in. And it says even more about why Democrats keep losing the culture war, and with it, the narrative war that inevitably shapes who wins elections.


Does the middle class care about this story? Does the working class care about this story? I doubt it.

The Dems are past just dropping the PC/Identity Politics shit and re-focusing on the Middle Class. It should APOLOGIZE for the all horseshit it has unloaded on the American public over the last couple of decades, ADMIT that it has gone too far, and THEN re-focus on the Middle Class.
 
Last edited:
How in the world is that political, you might ask? It's because that otherwise benign commericial that she's in sparked YET ANOTHER racially-charged, politically-charged firestorm that originated on the Left. I wish the entire Left would read this piece in Politico today: The Sydney Sweeney Saga Shows Why Republicans Keep Winning -- written by a Democrat and Harris campaign worker.

For the blissfully uninitiated: The actress Sydney Sweeney was the face of a new ad for American Eagle where they say she has “good jeans.” This is obviously a play on “good genes,” which to most people was a reference to how she is good looking, and to a small cadre of extremely online lefty posters and SEO-chasing online media outlets was a reference to Nazism and eugenics. The right made a whole thing about it, accusing Democrats of being out-of-touch scolds, and somehow Democrats have found themselves on the defensive. The episode caused confusion, consternation and a wave of Democrats performatively affirming that yes, they too think Sydney Sweeney is beautiful. Welcome to 2025.

You might be wondering why anybody cares about this. But here’s the thing: The fact that this moment became a thing at all — that a stupid pun could metastasize into a full-blown political moment — says something real about the media ecosystem we’re all trapped in. And it says even more about why Democrats keep losing the culture war, and with it, the narrative war that inevitably shapes who wins elections.


Does the middle class care about this story? Does the working class care about this story? I doubt it.

The Dems are past just dropping the PC/Identity Politics shit and re-focusing on the Middle Class. It should APOLOGIZE for the all horseshit it has unloaded on the American public over the last couple of decades, and THEN re-focus on the Middle Class.
That ad went far beyond just showcasing beauty and highlighted what used to be American culture and the yearn most have to return to a better shared culture. What's next? Apple pie is racist and only eaten by Nazis? Anyone who found that ad so offensive should probably think about emigrating to another more suitable country. Or seek professional psychiatric help.
 
What Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad says about a divided America

As debate surrounding the advertisement intensified, the conversation became less about denim and more about identity. What began as a marketing stunt spiraled into a mirror reflecting deeper societal fractures, where a pair of jeans could symbolize political allegiance, cultural values and morality.

Selepak said the brand politicization carries broader implications for how we engage with one another.

“The biggest negative to it is the sort of politicization of brands and products,” he said. “We’re kind of getting into this point where we’re saying, ‘I don’t want to be around people who view a topic differently … We can’t interact.’”
 
and to a small cadre of extremely online lefty posters and SEO-chasing online media outlets was a reference to Nazism and eugenics.
because of the actions of the above--a small cadre of extremely online lefty posters, Democrats writ large should apologize?

No logic resides in your argument.

What it does reflect is that the right wing is much better at consolidating outrage. The problem democrats have is that they are not a homogenous group but rather a coalition of many different groups. The right wing is simply angry white people; or people who are angry and wish they were white.

Here is an example of how silent the left is under like circumstances....

Within the last 48 hours, the US SECDEF apparently re-tweeted/posted a message saying women couldn't vote. I've been busy and haven't seen it but the story is below.


One would think that an incendiary message by a credentialed member of a party would carry more outrage than your "small cadre" does but it doesn't because the left doesn't consolidate outrage.

Will you call on Republicans to apologize for such hogwash since the bullshit comes from a credentialed republican--6th in the order of succession? ? Nope. Why? Because there is no maelstrom of consolidated outrage from leftwing pundits for you to buy into. Its sad that you need social media and partisan windbags to tell you how to think.
 
because of the actions of the above--a small cadre of extremely online lefty posters, Democrats writ large should apologize?

No logic resides in your argument.

What it does reflect is that the right wing is much better at consolidating outrage. The problem democrats have is that they are not a homogenous group but rather a coalition of many different groups. The right wing is simply angry white people; or people who are angry and wish they were white.

Here is an example of how silent the left is under like circumstances....

Within the last 48 hours, the US SECDEF apparently re-tweeted/posted a message saying women couldn't vote. I've been busy and haven't seen it but the story is below.


One would think that an incendiary message by a credentialed member of a party would carry more outrage than your "small cadre" does but it doesn't because the left doesn't consolidate outrage.

Will you call on Republicans to apologize for such hogwash since the bullshit comes from a credentialed republican--6th in the order of succession? ? Nope. Why? Because there is no maelstrom of consolidated outrage from leftwing pundits for you to buy into. Its sad that you need social media and partisan windbags to tell you how to think.
The part of the OP that is in italics is cut-and-pasted from the piece. The Harris campaign worker wrote that, not me.

If you don't see a problem, if you believe everything is working out just fine for the Left right now, great.
 
because of the actions of the above--a small cadre of extremely online lefty posters, Democrats writ large should apologize?
My Dad puts it this way:

"The hit dog always hollers first."

Besides, you've been labeling everyone on the right for the actions of a few for the past 15 years. You have no place to act like a victim.
 
The part of the OP that is in italics is cut-and-pasted from the piece. The Harris campaign worker wrote that, not me.
Wow, you mean a harris campaign worker (an entity that no longer exists) wrote that??? Incredible!
If you don't see a problem, if you believe everything is working out just fine for the Left right now, great.
I certainly do not believe everything is working out fine for the left. Your mis-representation of my post is sad.

What I do believe is what I wrote...the right wing (take a look at this board for further proof) makes everything into a battle for the nation's soul. Its sad that you have bought into it. But it's sadder still that many voters who know better have also bought into it as well.

As Andrew Sheppherd (sp?) said--that is how you win elections.

"That, ladies and gentlemen, is how you win elections. You gather a group of middle age, middle class, middle income voters who remember with longing an easier time, and you talk to them about family, and American values and character, and you wave an old photo of the President's girlfriend and you scream about patriotism."--The American President.
 
My Dad puts it this way:

"The hit dog always hollers first."

Besides, you've been labeling everyone on the right for the actions of a few for the past 15 years. You have no place to act like a victim.

I see...

Has anyone on the far right spoken against the SECDEF's feelings that women shouldn't vote yet?
 
I see...

Has anyone on the far right spoken against the SECDEF's feelings that women shouldn't vote yet?
Have you stopped to see how you're deflecting from Mac's point?

You're already attacking the source in your previous post. If it weren't true, you wouldn't be acting so defensively right now.
 
15th post
Have you stopped to see how you're deflecting from Mac's point?
His point was that Democrats should apologize for the actions of what he admits are a "small cadre" of "far left" people. Yeah...it was silly.
You're already attacking the source in your previous post. If it weren't true, you wouldn't be acting so defensively right now.
Ummm no. Was pointing out how the right wing makes everything a battle for the nation's soul and how silly it is that so many people buy into the outrage.

Did Bud Light make you gay?
 
The American Eagle Jeans she's advertising are. Your selective outrage is nice though.
Speak for yourself. I'm not outraged, I'm amused by your reaction to her ad, and to her personally.

But odds are, the PC/laptop/phone you're typing on wasn't made in America either, but that doesn't bother you in the slightest. Selective outrage, am I right?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom