Surprise Surprise. Bezos's Paper Is Worried About Controls On Price Gouging

skews13

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
10,738
Reaction score
14,370
Points
2,415
The WP editorial board issued an opinion piece that describes MVP Harris’ economic plan as being full of populist gimmicks. They then make the clearly false statement that ā€œprice gouging is not causing inflationā€.

www.washingtonpost.com/…

The MSM has been full of these lies for the last few days, including a NYT article that quotes a bunch of economists providing simplistic ā€œsupply and demandā€ boilerplate before launching into their criticisms (the comments section is even worse, as it is flooded with economics 101 ā€œfree market magicā€ comments that then veer into fear mongering about centrally planned economies.

The articles disputing the impact of price gauging fail on simple math

It is true that prices spiked due to supply issues during the height of covid, but corporate profit margins increased and overall profits increased. Therefore, they sold a lower volume at a mark-up level that more than made up for the decrease in volume.

When the supply-chain issues were resolved (with massive public investment), prices did not go down. This would not be the dreaded ā€œdeflationā€ but an expected price correction that would happen naturally in a free market… Evidence that there was no competitive pressure to reduce prices (monopoly control and/or collusion)

After the resolution of the supply issues, prices continued to rise.

The evidence is clear. There has been excessive consolidation in the retail sector and price gouging has been a major driver of inflation over the last several years. Fighting these monopoly practices is a way to restore free-market balance. It is no gimmick.

 
The WP editorial board issued an opinion piece that describes MVP Harris’ economic plan as being full of populist gimmicks. They then make the clearly false statement that ā€œprice gouging is not causing inflationā€.

www.washingtonpost.com/…

The MSM has been full of these lies for the last few days, including a NYT article that quotes a bunch of economists providing simplistic ā€œsupply and demandā€ boilerplate before launching into their criticisms (the comments section is even worse, as it is flooded with economics 101 ā€œfree market magicā€ comments that then veer into fear mongering about centrally planned economies.

The articles disputing the impact of price gauging fail on simple math

It is true that prices spiked due to supply issues during the height of covid, but corporate profit margins increased and overall profits increased. Therefore, they sold a lower volume at a mark-up level that more than made up for the decrease in volume.

When the supply-chain issues were resolved (with massive public investment), prices did not go down. This would not be the dreaded ā€œdeflationā€ but an expected price correction that would happen naturally in a free market… Evidence that there was no competitive pressure to reduce prices (monopoly control and/or collusion)

After the resolution of the supply issues, prices continued to rise.

The evidence is clear. There has been excessive consolidation in the retail sector and price gouging has been a major driver of inflation over the last several years. Fighting these monopoly practices is a way to restore free-market balance. It is no gimmick.



We need some karma up in this place!

So many have been fooled for so long. It's incredible and frightening at the same time. The fact that they now say the quiet part out loud suggests that they KNOW what the outcome is going to be.

Time to return to the horse and buggy. Well deserved perhaps.

For the record, China won't be joining the West in this pursuit.

horseandbuggy.gif
 
The WP editorial board issued an opinion piece that describes MVP Harris’ economic plan as being full of populist gimmicks. They then make the clearly false statement that ā€œprice gouging is not causing inflationā€.

www.washingtonpost.com/…

The MSM has been full of these lies for the last few days, including a NYT article that quotes a bunch of economists providing simplistic ā€œsupply and demandā€ boilerplate before launching into their criticisms (the comments section is even worse, as it is flooded with economics 101 ā€œfree market magicā€ comments that then veer into fear mongering about centrally planned economies.

The articles disputing the impact of price gauging fail on simple math

It is true that prices spiked due to supply issues during the height of covid, but corporate profit margins increased and overall profits increased. Therefore, they sold a lower volume at a mark-up level that more than made up for the decrease in volume.

When the supply-chain issues were resolved (with massive public investment), prices did not go down. This would not be the dreaded ā€œdeflationā€ but an expected price correction that would happen naturally in a free market… Evidence that there was no competitive pressure to reduce prices (monopoly control and/or collusion)

After the resolution of the supply issues, prices continued to rise.

The evidence is clear. There has been excessive consolidation in the retail sector and price gouging has been a major driver of inflation over the last several years. Fighting these monopoly practices is a way to restore free-market balance. It is no gimmick.

This coming from the left that claimed inflation wasn’t that bad. lol!
 
The WP editorial board issued an opinion piece that describes MVP Harris’ economic plan as being full of populist gimmicks. They then make the clearly false statement that ā€œprice gouging is not causing inflationā€.

www.washingtonpost.com/…

The MSM has been full of these lies for the last few days, including a NYT article that quotes a bunch of economists providing simplistic ā€œsupply and demandā€ boilerplate before launching into their criticisms (the comments section is even worse, as it is flooded with economics 101 ā€œfree market magicā€ comments that then veer into fear mongering about centrally planned economies.

The articles disputing the impact of price gauging fail on simple math

It is true that prices spiked due to supply issues during the height of covid, but corporate profit margins increased and overall profits increased. Therefore, they sold a lower volume at a mark-up level that more than made up for the decrease in volume.

When the supply-chain issues were resolved (with massive public investment), prices did not go down. This would not be the dreaded ā€œdeflationā€ but an expected price correction that would happen naturally in a free market… Evidence that there was no competitive pressure to reduce prices (monopoly control and/or collusion)

After the resolution of the supply issues, prices continued to rise.

The evidence is clear. There has been excessive consolidation in the retail sector and price gouging has been a major driver of inflation over the last several years. Fighting these monopoly practices is a way to restore free-market balance. It is no gimmick.

Maybe you should look somewhere besides the Daily Kook for your economics information. You are too clueless to offer any other advice.
 
The WP editorial board issued an opinion piece that describes MVP Harris’ economic plan as being full of populist gimmicks. They then make the clearly false statement that ā€œprice gouging is not causing inflationā€.

www.washingtonpost.com/…

The MSM has been full of these lies for the last few days, including a NYT article that quotes a bunch of economists providing simplistic ā€œsupply and demandā€ boilerplate before launching into their criticisms (the comments section is even worse, as it is flooded with economics 101 ā€œfree market magicā€ comments that then veer into fear mongering about centrally planned economies.

The articles disputing the impact of price gauging fail on simple math

It is true that prices spiked due to supply issues during the height of covid, but corporate profit margins increased and overall profits increased. Therefore, they sold a lower volume at a mark-up level that more than made up for the decrease in volume.

When the supply-chain issues were resolved (with massive public investment), prices did not go down. This would not be the dreaded ā€œdeflationā€ but an expected price correction that would happen naturally in a free market… Evidence that there was no competitive pressure to reduce prices (monopoly control and/or collusion)

After the resolution of the supply issues, prices continued to rise.

The evidence is clear. There has been excessive consolidation in the retail sector and price gouging has been a major driver of inflation over the last several years. Fighting these monopoly practices is a way to restore free-market balance. It is no gimmick.

skrewey getting his news from the comic book again.
Maybe if you had a job you could grasp some sense of reality....
Plus, isn't Bezos one of yours??
 
The WP editorial board issued an opinion piece that describes MVP Harris’ economic plan as being full of populist gimmicks. They then make the clearly false statement that ā€œprice gouging is not causing inflationā€.

www.washingtonpost.com/…

The MSM has been full of these lies for the last few days, including a NYT article that quotes a bunch of economists providing simplistic ā€œsupply and demandā€ boilerplate before launching into their criticisms (the comments section is even worse, as it is flooded with economics 101 ā€œfree market magicā€ comments that then veer into fear mongering about centrally planned economies.

The articles disputing the impact of price gauging fail on simple math

It is true that prices spiked due to supply issues during the height of covid, but corporate profit margins increased and overall profits increased. Therefore, they sold a lower volume at a mark-up level that more than made up for the decrease in volume.

When the supply-chain issues were resolved (with massive public investment), prices did not go down. This would not be the dreaded ā€œdeflationā€ but an expected price correction that would happen naturally in a free market… Evidence that there was no competitive pressure to reduce prices (monopoly control and/or collusion)

After the resolution of the supply issues, prices continued to rise.

The evidence is clear. There has been excessive consolidation in the retail sector and price gouging has been a major driver of inflation over the last several years. Fighting these monopoly practices is a way to restore free-market balance. It is no gimmick.

Well yeah.....he now owns Whole Foods which is nicknamed Whole Paycheck by some people....so yep he's gonna sweat this shit for sure.
 
Back
Top Bottom