Suppressors SBRs and SBSs - Like Obama, just don't enforce the law.

[M14 Shooter]

In 2009, the Obama administration changed its policy on cannabis enforcement to, generally, defer to the states in the enforcement of laws with regard to same -- that is, if the production, trafficking, possession, and use of cannabis was legal in a certain state, the administration would not enforce federal cannabis in that state.

In light of recent events regarding the "non-partisan' Parliamentarian's exclusion of language which removed suppressors, SBRs and SBSs from the NFA's transfer requirements, the Trump administration should take a similar approach to these items:
If the possession and use of suppressors, SBRs and SBSs are legal in a given state, the DoJ will not enforce the federal laws regarding these items.

Like Obama, Trump has a pen and a phone.

 

[1srelluc]

Better yet, just fire the Parliamentarian....Harry Reid hired her, Thune can change the rules and fire her.

Blah, RINOs hate 2-A freedoms as much as dems do.

 

[badbob85037]

In 2009, the Obama administration changed its policy on cannabis enforcement to, generally, defer to the states in the enforcement of laws with regard to same -- that is, if the production, trafficking, possession, and use of cannabis was legal in a certain state, the administration would not enforce federal cannabis in that state.

In light of recent events regarding the "non-partisan' Parliamentarian's exclusion of language which removed suppressors, SBRs and SBSs from the NFA's transfer requirements, the Trump administration should take a similar approach to these items:
If the possession and use of suppressors, SBRs and SBSs are legal in a given state, the DoJ will not enforce the federal laws regarding these items.

Like Obama, Trump has a pen and a phone.

When Clinton passed all his gun control laws law enforcement in Arizona didn't enforcement it as most still believe in the Constitution and it's Bill of Rights. Not like places as New York and California where the populations are mostly ignorant of their rights and we all know if you don't know your rights you have none.

 

[Seth]

In 2009, the Obama administration changed its policy on cannabis enforcement to, generally, defer to the states in the enforcement of laws with regard to same -- that is, if the production, trafficking, possession, and use of cannabis was legal in a certain state, the administration would not enforce federal cannabis in that state.

You make a solid point about federal enforcement flexibility—and I’d absolutely support a similar approach to suppressors, SBRs, and SBSs. If a state has already decided they’re legal and regulated, I don’t see the sense in having the DOJ treat those citizens like felons just for following state law.

Personally, I support reduced regulation on suppressors not because they’re tactical or scary, but for the same reasons they’re embraced in much of Europe:

• Hearing protection – Even with earplugs, a suppressed shot significantly reduces long-term hearing damage for hunters and sport shooters.
• Noise pollution – Suppressors help avoid disturbing nearby homes, livestock, and other hunters or hikers—especially in rural areas.
• Wildlife ethics – A quieter report startles animals less, reducing suffering if a follow-up shot is needed.
• Courtesy, not concealment – In places like Finland, Norway, and the UK, suppressors are just seen as responsible equipment—like seat belts or mufflers.

And honestly, the whole system is out of proportion. A suppressor is just a metal tube with baffles—no moving parts, no explosive function. It’s basically a car muffler, just for a rifle. Requiring a $200 tax stamp, 9-month wait, and a federal registry for one is like demanding that you register your car’s muffler as a separate vehicle at the DMV. It’s bureaucratic theater, not public safety.

As for SBRs and SBSs, I’m not making the same cultural comparison to Europe there—but I do support simplifying our gun laws by regulating pistols, rifles, and shotguns all under a single unified firearms category. That way, barrel length or whether a pistol has a shoulder stock becomes irrelevant. A gun is a gun. No more legal gymnastics over inches of barrel or brace angles.

Personally, I’d even support broader deregulation of man-portable machine guns—like the Glock 18 pistol—treating them like any other firearm, regardless of firing rate—but that’s a fight for another time.


If we’re serious about normalizing responsible gun ownership and safety culture, this seems like low-hanging fruit.

Video for attention