Suddenly Democrats Are OK With Sexual Predators Remaining In Office?!

[LordBrownTrout]

Of course we should ALL notice how this thread went from the LAME "defenses" of the orange ****-up.................To Bill Clinton......

Here's an interesting tidbit


During the first day of impeachment hearings, Starr clears Clinton in relation to the firing of White House travel office workers in 1993 and the improper collection of FBI files revealed in 1996. He also says his office drafted an impeachment referral stemming from Whitewater in 1997, but decided not to send it because the evidence was insufficient.

Wild bill was impeached for lying to a federal grand jury.

 

[koshergrl]

Once you can present any evidence - such as that against Franken along with his ADMISSION - feel free to show him the door, too.

You're shitting us right? Trump has over a dozen accusers, and his admission on video tape.

Means absolutely nothing and he admitted nothing.

Mob mentality brutes have been taught to believe that if a lot of criminals say the same thing about something, it means they're telling the truth.

 

[jillian]

Dem Senators: On second thought, maybe Franken should stay - Hot Air

'Over the weekend, it seems that some Democrats in the upper chamber have had second thoughts about calling for Al Franken’s resignation in the wake of sexual assault allegations made against him. Too little, too late? Or could Franken actually use this as an opportunity to at least “postpone” his departure and give the Ethics Committee another shot at his case as he’d originally intended? That might depend on how influential his colleagues are, now that they’re suggesting there’s a path to redemption which allows him to keep his job.'

In the wake of losing so many Democrats in Congress to consequences of their sexual misconduct Dems are back to potentially claiming 'Franken can be redeemed, will learn from his mistakes, etc....'

Bwuhaha......

awwww.... well, sergei, we're waiting for your orangte sexual predator to step down.

let us know when he does.

until then, tell vlad you're useless and not worth the money you're being paid.

 

[jillian]

Of course we should ALL notice how this thread went from the LAME "defenses" of the orange ****-up.................To Bill Clinton......

Here's an interesting tidbit


During the first day of impeachment hearings, Starr clears Clinton in relation to the firing of White House travel office workers in 1993 and the improper collection of FBI files revealed in 1996. He also says his office drafted an impeachment referral stemming from Whitewater in 1997, but decided not to send it because the evidence was insufficient.

Wild bill was impeached for lying to a federal grand jury.

no. he was not. that is false. he was impeached for lying at a deposition in a civil case when he said he didn't cheat on his wife --- while newtie, who was running that side show, was cheating on his wife with his assistant. cute, huh?

and bill was found not guilty by the senate. you seem to forget that part

 

[ShootSpeeders]

His phony resignation a few weeks back was just a trick to help doug jones beat roy moore in alabama. The dems were able to say "See - we force our sex fiends to leave but repubs don't."

https://nypost.com/2017/12/18/democrats-now-regret-pushing-accused-groper-al-franken-to-resign/

dec 18 2017 Some Democratic senators now regret pushing accused groper Sen. Al Franken to resign, and are urging him to stay on, according to a new report.

“I think we acted prematurely, before we had all the facts,” one anonymous senator told Politico. “In retrospect, I think we acted too fast.”

Franken reluctantly bowed to his colleagues’ demands to step down earlier this month after he was accused of sexual assault by eight women, saying he’d leave the Senate “in the coming weeks.” Minnesota Lt. Gov. Tina Smith has been tapped as his replacement.

But at least four senators — including three who initially joined the chorus demanding the handsy lawmaker step down — now want the Minnesota pol to reconsider his planned January exit, the site reports.

Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, who publicly demanded Franken resign at the time, is also said to be among those having regrets, Politico reports.

Some Democratic donors are on board, too.

“I and many other people — and specifically feminists — feel that it’s not too late, that he should not resign, and that the rush to sweep him out was ill-conceived, and we think that he has been supportive of women and women’s issues,” said retired New York state Supreme Court judge Emily Jane Goodman.

 

[radical right]

I don't call his book 'evidence' of anything that could be considered 'evidence' in court.

It was used as evidence in the goldman v simpson trial. So you would be wrong.

 

[nat4900]

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump whooped the crap out of Hillary and became the 45th president

THREE MILLION more Americans voted against the orange ****-up....
NEVER forget that.......LOL

 

[easyt65]

It was used as evidence in the goldman v simpson trial. So you would be wrong.

I did not say it was never be used or could never be used as 'evidence''. You were talking about what I would consider evidence or not. I don't call his book 'evidence' of anything that could be considered 'evidence' in court. I would not trust it / use it as 'evidence'.

You lose again....

 

[Doc1]

Of course we should ALL notice how this thread went from the LAME "defenses" of the orange ****-up.................To Bill Clinton......

Here's an interesting tidbit


During the first day of impeachment hearings, Starr clears Clinton in relation to the firing of White House travel office workers in 1993 and the improper collection of FBI files revealed in 1996. He also says his office drafted an impeachment referral stemming from Whitewater in 1997, but decided not to send it because the evidence was insufficient.

Wild bill was impeached for lying to a federal grand jury.

no. he was not. that is false. he was impeached for lying at a deposition in a civil case when he said he didn't cheat on his wife --- while newtie, who was running that side show, was cheating on his wife with his assistant. cute, huh?

and bill was found not guilty by the senate. you seem to forget that part

"On April 12, 1999, Wright found Clinton in contempt of court for “intentionally false” testimony in Jones v. Clinton, fined him $90,000, and referred the case to the Arkansas Supreme Court’s Committee on Professional Conduct, as Clinton still possessed a law license in Arkansas.

The Arkansas Supreme Court suspended Clinton’s Arkansas law license in April 2000. On January 19, 2001, Clinton agreed to a five-year suspension and a $25,000 fine in order to avoid disbarment and to end the investigation of Independent Counsel Robert Ray (Starr’s successor). On October 1, 2001, Clinton’s U.S. Supreme Court law license was suspended, with 40 days to contest his disbarment. On November 9, 2001, the last day for Clinton to contest the disbarment, he opted to resign from the Supreme Court Bar, surrendering his license, rather than facing penalties related to disbarment."

Lost Law Licenses: Presidents Obama, Clinton, and Nixon - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

You're such a lying hack.

 

[mudwhistle]

His phony resignation a few weeks back was just a trick to help doug jones beat roy moore in alabama. The dems were able to say "See - we force our sex fiends to leave but repubs don't."

https://nypost.com/2017/12/18/democrats-now-regret-pushing-accused-groper-al-franken-to-resign/

dec 18 2017 Some Democratic senators now regret pushing accused groper Sen. Al Franken to resign, and are urging him to stay on, according to a new report.

“I think we acted prematurely, before we had all the facts,” one anonymous senator told Politico. “In retrospect, I think we acted too fast.”

Franken reluctantly bowed to his colleagues’ demands to step down earlier this month after he was accused of sexual assault by eight women, saying he’d leave the Senate “in the coming weeks.” Minnesota Lt. Gov. Tina Smith has been tapped as his replacement.

But at least four senators — including three who initially joined the chorus demanding the handsy lawmaker step down — now want the Minnesota pol to reconsider his planned January exit, the site reports.

Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, who publicly demanded Franken resign at the time, is also said to be among those having regrets, Politico reports.

Some Democratic donors are on board, too.

“I and many other people — and specifically feminists — feel that it’s not too late, that he should not resign, and that the rush to sweep him out was ill-conceived, and we think that he has been supportive of women and women’s issues,” said retired New York state Supreme Court judge Emily Jane Goodman.

Yep.....he's going to vote against the tax cut and probably against funding the government.
They should have escorted his lying perverted ass out of the halls of Congress.

This is the kind of corruption that happens in 3rd world dictatorships when one side runs the propaganda machine we now call the mainstream media.

 

[jillian]

Of course we should ALL notice how this thread went from the LAME "defenses" of the orange ****-up.................To Bill Clinton......

Here's an interesting tidbit


During the first day of impeachment hearings, Starr clears Clinton in relation to the firing of White House travel office workers in 1993 and the improper collection of FBI files revealed in 1996. He also says his office drafted an impeachment referral stemming from Whitewater in 1997, but decided not to send it because the evidence was insufficient.

Wild bill was impeached for lying to a federal grand jury.

no. he was not. that is false. he was impeached for lying at a deposition in a civil case when he said he didn't cheat on his wife --- while newtie, who was running that side show, was cheating on his wife with his assistant. cute, huh?

and bill was found not guilty by the senate. you seem to forget that part

"On April 12, 1999, Wright found Clinton in contempt of court for “intentionally false” testimony in Jones v. Clinton, fined him $90,000, and referred the case to the Arkansas Supreme Court’s Committee on Professional Conduct, as Clinton still possessed a law license in Arkansas.

The Arkansas Supreme Court suspended Clinton’s Arkansas law license in April 2000. On January 19, 2001, Clinton agreed to a five-year suspension and a $25,000 fine in order to avoid disbarment and to end the investigation of Independent Counsel Robert Ray (Starr’s successor). On October 1, 2001, Clinton’s U.S. Supreme Court law license was suspended, with 40 days to contest his disbarment. On November 9, 2001, the last day for Clinton to contest the disbarment, he opted to resign from the Supreme Court Bar, surrendering his license, rather than facing penalties related to disbarment."

Lost Law Licenses: Presidents Obama, Clinton, and Nixon - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

You're such a lying hack.

so what part of that is different from what I said. he gave a deposition in jones v Clinton... he said he didn't cheat on his wife.

your point has nothing to do with what we were discussing since he was discussing the impeachment.... in which he was found not guilty.

you know, or he'd have had to leave the presidency. that didn't happen.

I hope that helps you. no doubt you had fun doing a little google thing on something wholly unrelated to what I said.

 

[radical right]

I don't call his book 'evidence' of anything that could be considered 'evidence' in court.

It was used as evidence in the goldman v simpson trial. So you would be wrong.

I did not say it was never be used or could never be used as 'evidence''..

I don't call his book 'evidence' of anything that could be considered 'evidence' in court

 

[easyt65]

"On April 12, 1999, Wright found Clinton in contempt of court for “intentionally false” testimony in Jones v. Clinton, fined him $90,000, and referred the case to the Arkansas Supreme Court’s Committee on Professional Conduct, as Clinton still possessed a law license in Arkansas.

On October 1, 2001, Clinton’s U.S. Supreme Court law license was suspended, with 40 days to contest his disbarment. On November 9, 2001, the last day for Clinton to contest the disbarment, he opted to resign from the Supreme Court Bar, surrendering his license, rather than facing penalties related to disbarment."

Lying / Intentionally Giving False Testimony, attempting to deny a US Citizen of her Constitutional Right to a 'Fair Trial' in order to cover up his sexual misconduct / crimes, fined, disbarred ... NOT AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE FOR A PRESIDENT, ACCORDING TO SNOWFLAKES....

 

[easyt65]

I don't call his book 'evidence' of anything that could be considered 'evidence' in court.

It was used as evidence in the goldman v simpson trial. So you would be wrong.

I did not say it was never be used or could never be used as 'evidence''..

I don't call his book 'evidence' of anything that could be considered 'evidence' in court

Thanks for helping prove I never said the book could not be used / was not used as 'evidence' but that I instead said I would not consider it / call it evidence.....

 

[nat4900]

So, this thread has become a rehash of Clinton's blow job and lying in a civil case?

Folks, there's an orange clown sitting in the oval office ******* things up...

WAKE UP!!!

 

[radical right]

I don't call his book 'evidence' of anything that could be considered 'evidence' in court.

I did not say it was never be used or could never be used as 'evidence''..

I don't call his book 'evidence' of anything that could be considered 'evidence' in court

Thanks for helping prove I never said the book could not be used / was not used as 'evidence' but that I instead said I would not consider it / call it evidence.....

People are laughing at watching you flop around like a fish.

You said could instead of should. But since you said could, you're trying to walk back your mistake. Live with it.

 

[TomParks]

His phony resignation a few weeks back was just a trick to help doug jones beat roy moore in alabama. The dems were able to say "See - we force our sex fiends to leave but repubs don't."

https://nypost.com/2017/12/18/democrats-now-regret-pushing-accused-groper-al-franken-to-resign/

dec 18 2017 Some Democratic senators now regret pushing accused groper Sen. Al Franken to resign, and are urging him to stay on, according to a new report.

“I think we acted prematurely, before we had all the facts,” one anonymous senator told Politico. “In retrospect, I think we acted too fast.”

Franken reluctantly bowed to his colleagues’ demands to step down earlier this month after he was accused of sexual assault by eight women, saying he’d leave the Senate “in the coming weeks.” Minnesota Lt. Gov. Tina Smith has been tapped as his replacement.

But at least four senators — including three who initially joined the chorus demanding the handsy lawmaker step down — now want the Minnesota pol to reconsider his planned January exit, the site reports.

Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, who publicly demanded Franken resign at the time, is also said to be among those having regrets, Politico reports.

Some Democratic donors are on board, too.

“I and many other people — and specifically feminists — feel that it’s not too late, that he should not resign, and that the rush to sweep him out was ill-conceived, and we think that he has been supportive of women and women’s issues,” said retired New York state Supreme Court judge Emily Jane Goodman.

Yep.....he's going to vote against the tax cut and probably against funding the government.
They should have escorted his lying perverted ass out of the halls of Congress.

This is the kind of corruption that happens in 3rd world dictatorships when one side runs the propaganda machine we now call the mainstream media.

Yep and the stole the election from Moore....Bannon should have prepared better it was common knowledge they were going to bring in blacks from surrounding states

 

[Crixus]

His phony resignation a few weeks back was just a trick to help doug jones beat roy moore in alabama. The dems were able to say "See - we force our sex fiends to leave but repubs don't."

https://nypost.com/2017/12/18/democrats-now-regret-pushing-accused-groper-al-franken-to-resign/

dec 18 2017 Some Democratic senators now regret pushing accused groper Sen. Al Franken to resign, and are urging him to stay on, according to a new report.

“I think we acted prematurely, before we had all the facts,” one anonymous senator told Politico. “In retrospect, I think we acted too fast.”

Franken reluctantly bowed to his colleagues’ demands to step down earlier this month after he was accused of sexual assault by eight women, saying he’d leave the Senate “in the coming weeks.” Minnesota Lt. Gov. Tina Smith has been tapped as his replacement.

But at least four senators — including three who initially joined the chorus demanding the handsy lawmaker step down — now want the Minnesota pol to reconsider his planned January exit, the site reports.

Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, who publicly demanded Franken resign at the time, is also said to be among those having regrets, Politico reports.

Some Democratic donors are on board, too.

“I and many other people — and specifically feminists — feel that it’s not too late, that he should not resign, and that the rush to sweep him out was ill-conceived, and we think that he has been supportive of women and women’s issues,” said retired New York state Supreme Court judge Emily Jane Goodman.

I don’t think he should. I say let him go home to let his voters decide.

 

[miketx]

His phony resignation a few weeks back was just a trick to help doug jones beat roy moore in alabama. The dems were able to say "See - we force our sex fiends to leave but repubs don't."

https://nypost.com/2017/12/18/democrats-now-regret-pushing-accused-groper-al-franken-to-resign/

dec 18 2017 Some Democratic senators now regret pushing accused groper Sen. Al Franken to resign, and are urging him to stay on, according to a new report.

“I think we acted prematurely, before we had all the facts,” one anonymous senator told Politico. “In retrospect, I think we acted too fast.”

Franken reluctantly bowed to his colleagues’ demands to step down earlier this month after he was accused of sexual assault by eight women, saying he’d leave the Senate “in the coming weeks.” Minnesota Lt. Gov. Tina Smith has been tapped as his replacement.

But at least four senators — including three who initially joined the chorus demanding the handsy lawmaker step down — now want the Minnesota pol to reconsider his planned January exit, the site reports.

Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, who publicly demanded Franken resign at the time, is also said to be among those having regrets, Politico reports.

Some Democratic donors are on board, too.

“I and many other people — and specifically feminists — feel that it’s not too late, that he should not resign, and that the rush to sweep him out was ill-conceived, and we think that he has been supportive of women and women’s issues,” said retired New York state Supreme Court judge Emily Jane Goodman.

That's what I thought. I may have posted it here.

 

[mamooth]

It's an answer to Republican anti-Constitutional dirty tricks.

The Republicans refuse to swear in Jones, which is a Constitutional violation. One that every Republicans here supports, because all Republicans shit on the Constitution for fun.

When the Republicans swear in Jones, and promise to immediately swear in Franken's replacement, then Franken should resign. He should not, however, allow Republican cheating to pay off.