JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,895
- 2,220
- Thread starter
- #21
Does the OP read his own links?
Yes, so what is your ******* point, or are you sober enough to state what it is?
lol, these libtard tricks are so predictable. Dumbass here makes a vague statement suggesting that I didn't readmy own post, like libtards do all the time, and I am automatically supposed to go searching through my onw post, wondering what the **** he is referring to, roflamo.
Now, there are a couple of important caveats to the researchers' findings. For one thing, an Ebola case reaching a developed country with an efficient healthcare system probably won't cause the mass epidemic levels we've seen in Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone.
"What's more, the numbers come with a pretty high probability range, so while the U.S. could have a 18 percent infection risk at the end of the month, that number could also be as low as 1 percent."
Lol, thank you!
Actually, that is PROBABLY true, though not necessarily.
Again, compare the USA hospitals efficiency at controlling MRSA and you would see that this isn't a strong assumption that our health care system will handle Ebola well.
Ebola *might* be easier to spread than MRSA.