Strzok To Testify Before Congress; No Immunity, Will Not Invoke 5th Amendment

[Ridgerunner]

Strozk was transferred from Mueller's investigation when the texts became known because Mueller knew that fuckwits like yourself would endlessly whine about it.

I don't think someone would be considered to be "whining" at possible acts of sedition by a "FBI Deputy Assistant Director"... Of coarse you being a card carrying member of the Progressive party, you would be the one to know...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Strozk was transferred from Mueller's investigation when the texts became known because Mueller knew that fuckwits like yourself would endlessly whine about it.

I don't think someone would be considered to be "whining" at possible acts of sedition by a "FBI Deputy Assistant Director"... Of coarse you being a card carrying member of the Progressive party, you would be the one to know...

"Possible acts of sedition"

Did you know that sedition (defined as "conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch") is not illegal?

 

[Ridgerunner]

"Possible acts of sedition"

Did you know that sedition (defined as "conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch") is not illegal?

1. U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 2384

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

• US Code
• Notes

prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

 

[theDoctorisIn]

"Possible acts of sedition"

Did you know that sedition (defined as "conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch") is not illegal?

1. U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 2384

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

• US Code
• Notes

prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

Seditious conspiracy is not the same thing as "sedition".

Are you accusing Peter Strzok of conspiring to wage war on the United States?

 

[Rustic]

Sing like a canary you traitor

-Geaux
------------

Peter Strzok, the FBI counterintelligence agent removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, says he will voluntarily testify to Congressional investigators in the House Judiciary Committee and any other Congressional committee that asks, his attorney said in a letter released on Sunday after Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) threatened to Subpoena Strzok.

We were wondering what the seemingly new "who's gonna play me in the movie" Strzok headshot was all about...

Peter Strzok, who was singled out in a recent Justice Department inspector general report for the politically charged messages, would be willing to testify without immunity, and he would not invoke his Fifth Amendment rights in response to any question, his attorney, Aitan Goelman, said in an interview Sunday. Strzok has become a special target of President Trump, who has used the texts to question the Russia investigation. -WaPo

The disgraced FBI agent “wants the chance to clear his name and tell his story,” says Goelman, adding "He thinks that his position, character and actions have all been misrepresented and caricatured, and he wants an opportunity to remedy that."

No dates have been discussed yet for testimony, however Goelman called Goodlatte's subpoena threat "wholly unnecessary."

“Special Agent Strzok, who has been fully cooperative with the DOJ Office of Inspector General, intends to voluntarily appear and testify before your committee and any other Congressional committee that invites him,” wrote the Goelman, adding that Strzok “intends to answer any question put to him, and he intends to defend the integrity of the Clinton email investigation, the Russia collusion investigation to the extent that that’s a topic, and his own integrity.

Strzok To Testify Before Congress; No Immunity, Will Not Invoke 5th Amendment

The Clintons and Obamas sure know how to pick them...