No amount of evidence will change your OPINION. Ten thousand PH.D's to you are just some nonsense to be ignored.
So now you are just dodging...I ask for a single piece of observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports AGW over natural variability....and you can't produce it. So now you are going to build a whole logical fallacy blaming your inability to produce that single shred of evidence on me.
The problem isn't with them, it's you. If ten thousand medical doctors agreed on a diagnosis and cure you wouldn't question them once. PH.D's are doctors in fields other than medicine.
No..the problem is that there is not a single shred of observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports AGW over natural variability.
But speaking of doctors and diagnoses and cures...I was diagnosed some decades back with stomach ulcers...and was told that they were due to stress and was prescribed a "cure"...at the time, practically every MD on earth would have agreed that my ulcer was due to stress and the "cure" prescribed was as good as medicine could do. I told my doc that stress was not the issue and his cure which was aimed at alleviating stress would not do my ulcer any good at all.
Now some decades later, it turns out that my ulcer and everyone else's ulcers were not due to stress...they were due to gut bacteria....had I asked my doctor at the time for a single piece of observed, measured, quantified data supporting his claim that my ulcer was due to stress, he couldn't have produced it...he might have given me some line about consensus, or some other such pseudoscientific nonsense, but he could produce any real evidence to support his diagnosis, or his remedy.
Science isn't infallible...they get more wrong than they get right.
So again..I am asking for a single piece of observed, measured, quantified data that supports AGW over natural variability...and you can't produce it...not even one single piece.
You really don't know how ridiculous you sound contradicting the world's PH.D's? Really?
I am asking for a single shred of observed, measured, quantified data that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...You can't produce it...how ridiculous are you for claiming that they must be right when no evidence exists that supports their claims?
And it isn't that unusual to be right while standing against the world's PhD's...cholesterol, salt, coffee, artificial sweeteners, quasi crystals, consumption of natural fats vs polyunsaturated fats...and on and on and on in practically every field....and if the field is relatively new, as is the case with climate science, the consensus is damned near always wrong..review your history.
I quit discussing this with people that refuse to acknowledge reality a while ago.
I can't say that I blame you...I mean when people start asking for just one piece of observed, measured, quantified that supports one hypothesis over another, what is the world coming to....hell, you can't talk to people who want a tidbit of actual evidence...especially when there is none...what other option do you have? You can A) stop talking to them and tell yourself that they are just not worth talking to, or B) continue talking and trying to explain why you can't produce even one single piece of observed, measured, quantified data that supports AGW over natural variability..and that just makes you look like a stupid dupe who believes anything he is told. Running away would seem to be your best bet if you want to hold on to your present point of view.
It's a waste of my time. Believe in a Flat Earth, that is as valid as any other nonsense you espouse. Now run along.
I am afraid that it will be you who runs along...tail tucked firmly between your legs...because I will keep asking for that bit of data and you will never be able to produce it because it doesn't exist...