Now that is Mr. Hamas representative's view of this. However, there are so many who will disagree with him and they have refuted this ...
Are those "others", dumbass trolls, such as yourself?
Listen idiot,
"conquer by conquest" has been outlawed ever since the end of WWII. It has nothing to do with any psycho-spin you want to put on it.
Conquer by Conquest:
The right of conquest is the right of a conqueror to territory taken by force of arms. It was traditionally a principle of international law which has in modern times gradually given way until its proscription after the Second World War when the crime of war of aggression was first codified in the Nuremberg Principles and then finally, in 1974, as a United Nations resolution 3314.
You cannot legally acquire land by force any more.
Just so we're clear on this and how it applies to Israel...
Definition of Aggression, United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX).
the territory of a State shall not be violated by being the object, even temporarily, of military occupation or of other measures of force taken by another State in contravention of the Charter,
and that it shall not be the object of acquisition by another State
resulting from such measures or the threat thereof,
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations
Any of the following acts, regardless of a declaration of war, shall, subject to and in accordance with the provisions of article 2, qualify as an act of aggression:
(a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof,
(b) Bombardment by the armed forces of a State against the territory of another State or the use of any weapons by a State against the territory of another State;
(c) The blockade of the ports or coasts of a State by the armed forces of another State;
(d) An attack by the armed forces of a State on the land, sea or air forces, or marine and air fleets of another State;
Now lets review...
...you cannot hold onto land seized in a war.
Israel cannot hold onto land seized in a war.
Israel cannot hold onto the West Bank, Golan Heights, Gaza and East Jerusalem.
Those are not
"disputed" areas, according to international law, they are
"occupied" areas, for the reasons listed above.
Those areas are not Israeli land, Israeli property, or Israeli ancestral whatever BS you want to make up; they do not belong to Israel, nor will they ever belong to Israel.
There are only two options on Israel's table:
- leave
- or get their ass kicked, just like Germany
Eventually, the world will not tolerate another pariah state, led by Nazi-Netanfuckyou.
but he seems to say the same old stuff regardless.
You really shouldn't talk about others saying
"the same old stuff"!