Stocks do 9 times better when Democrats are in the White House

[Listening]

But he was FORCED...and yet? You give him credit? Really?

He has to.

Or else his world falls apart.

Unlike some of us who are Republican who will give GWB credit for all kinds of bad things and not very much good.

I know you won't agree with me, but we are all entitled. My point being that I can admit when someone I think is pretty incompetent (but calls themselves a republican) is just that, but the left can't let go of their dogma that no matter how bad, it is still better than the GOP.

Now you are spouting gibberish.

Did your mother give you that response.

Just because you can't understand....does not make it gibberish.

And, I think you'll find I have not posted this 20 times already...unlike yourself who rarely, if ever, has an original thought.

Get a real job spambot.

 

[Chris]

216,000 jobs added last month.

3.9 million jobs added since 2009.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

216,000 jobs added last month.

3.9 million jobs added since 2009.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.

3.9 million jobs added since 2009.

And yet, still fewer jobs than the day Obama took office.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

216,000 jobs added last month.

3.9 million jobs added since 2009.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.

216,000 jobs added last month.

216,000 gained and 362,000 jobs lost.

In the week ending March 3, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 362,000, an increase of 8,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 354,000. The 4-week moving average was 355,000, an increase of 250 from the previous week's revised average of 354,750.

ETA Press Release: Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report

The obama labor department needs to watch out that they don't contridict themself.

 

[Chris]

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

But he was FORCED...and yet? You give him credit? Really?

He has to.

Or else his world falls apart.

Unlike some of us who are Republican who will give GWB credit for all kinds of bad things and not very much good.

I know you won't agree with me, but we are all entitled. My point being that I can admit when someone I think is pretty incompetent (but calls themselves a republican) is just that, but the left can't let go of their dogma that no matter how bad, it is still better than the GOP.

Now you are spouting gibberish.

Hey, Mr. Millionaire real estate mogul, how old are you today? 12? 16? 58? 43?

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street, stock investors do better when Democrats occupy the White House. From a dollars- and-cents standpoint, it’s not even close.

The BGOV Barometer shows that, over the five decades since John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, $1,000 invested in a hypothetical fund that tracks the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) only when Democrats are in the White House would have been worth $10,920 at the close of trading yesterday.

That’s more than nine times the dollar return an investor would have realized from following a similar strategy during Republican administrations. A $1,000 stake invested in a fund that followed the S&P 500 under Republican presidents, starting with Richard Nixon, would have grown to $2,087 on the day George W. Bush left office.

Stocks Return More With Democrat in White House: BGOV Barometer - Bloomberg

Wow.

Adding Dwight Eisenhower to the Republican column doesn’t overcome the Democratic advantage, either: $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 in January 1953 would have been worth $4,796 after 36 years under Republican chief executives -- still less than half the $10,920 nest egg accumulated in 23 years under Democrats.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street, stock investors do better when Democrats occupy the White House. From a dollars- and-cents standpoint, it’s not even close.

The BGOV Barometer shows that, over the five decades since John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, $1,000 invested in a hypothetical fund that tracks the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) only when Democrats are in the White House would have been worth $10,920 at the close of trading yesterday.

That’s more than nine times the dollar return an investor would have realized from following a similar strategy during Republican administrations. A $1,000 stake invested in a fund that followed the S&P 500 under Republican presidents, starting with Richard Nixon, would have grown to $2,087 on the day George W. Bush left office.

Stocks Return More With Democrat in White House: BGOV Barometer - Bloomberg

the stock market is a prognosticator, which is why we had the crash in '08, when it was clear Obama will be POTUS.

Funny how it rebounded to the same level the next June after Obama became President- even though it was even more clear that Obama was the POTUS.

God you're stupid.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

If that's true why the hell do radical lefties hate Wall Street? Is it some sort of bi-polar insanity?

We don't.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Correlation does not imply causation.

People will fall for anything.

Who said there was causation?


True, but lack of correlation DOES imply lack of causation The fact that upswings in the market are NOT correlated with Republicans being in office implies that Republcans do NOT cause the market to go up. It also implies Democrats do NOT cause the market to go down. However, you would be correct to state that the opposite of those statements - that Republicans cause the market to go down and Democrats cause it to go up - is NOT supported solely by the data.

 

[Listening]

216,000 jobs added last month.

3.9 million jobs added since 2009.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.

*** Spam Alert ***

*** Spam Alert ***

*** Spam Alert ***

*** Spam Alert ***

*** Spam Alert ***

*** Spam Alert ***

 

[Chris]

The Labor Department's broadest measure of unemployment, the U-6 unemployment rate, also continued its steady decline, now having fallen from 16.4 percent in September to 14.9 percent in February. This rate includes discouraged workers, people who have looked for work in the last 12 months, and people employed part-time for economic reasons, in addition to unemployed Americans.

Other data suggest that Americans may finally feel more optimistic about the labor market. The civilian labor force participation rate grew by 0.2 percentage points, to 63.9 percent--a small uptick, but the largest since spring 2010. The rate measures the number of people working or looking for a job as a percentage of the entire working-age population. This rate has been on a relatively steady decline since 2008, so the upward movement may mean that out-of-work Americans are re-entering the labor market.

A look at growth in individual industries also yields some promising signs. Manufacturing remains strong, adding 31,000 jobs in February.

Unemployment Steady at 8.3 Percent, but Job Market Improving: The jobless rate is unchanged, but the February jobs report contains much evidence of a sustained recovery - chicagotribune.com

 

[Chris]

The stock market does better with a Democratic president, because Democrats don't let Wall Street run Ponzi schemes.

 

[Avatar4321]

So what your saying is those greedy wall street brokers screw people over more when Democrats are in office?

You really need to keep your arguments straight. Your inability to remain internally consistant with your talking points seriously underminds your arguments.

 

[Avatar4321]

The stock market does better with a Democratic president, because Democrats don't let Wall Street run Ponzi schemes.

Or rather it's during Democrat administrations that the Ponzi schemes have full government support and when they leave office, everything falls apart in order to blame the other guys.

See, I could be a partisan hack if I wanted to as well.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The stock market does better with a Democratic president, because Democrats don't let Wall Street run Ponzi schemes.

Exactly! Which is why Clinton stopped Madoff.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The stock market does better with a Democratic president, because Democrats don't let Wall Street run Ponzi schemes.

Exactly! Which is why Clinton stopped Madoff.

You have to be careful with facts around Chris. You don't want to cause him to begin convulsing.

 

[konradv]

81% rise in the DOW over Obama's three years in office sounds good to me. What will the Reps have to run against, if that becomes 100%?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

81% rise in the DOW over Obama's three years in office sounds good to me. What will the Reps have to run against, if that becomes 100%?

They'll point to unemployment, high gas prices and Obama's general cluelessness.

 

[konradv]

81% rise in the DOW over Obama's three years in office sounds good to me. What will the Reps have to run against, if that becomes 100%?

They'll point to unemployment, high gas prices and Obama's general cluelessness.

Going down, annoyance but won't effect many votes and merely your opinion.