Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,899
- 1,530
no link. no experimental results.On this date, in the year 1858....
.....over a century and a half ago......Charles Darwin and Russell Wallace offered their theory of how the great number of species that inhabit the earth, came into existence.
"1st July 2018: 160th anniversary of the presentation of "On the tendency of Species to form Varieties"
160th anniversary of the presentation of "On the tendency of Species…
Discover the latest news from The Linnean Society of London.www.linnean.org
And, while it has proven advantageous to particular political views, when it is applied to science.......the theory has never been proven.
Yet....it is presented in school as proven, a fact.
As B.G. Ranganathan says, in his book ``Origins?’’, "There is no evidence in the fossil record of one kind of creature becoming another kind. No transitional links or intermediate forms between various kinds of creatures have ever been found."
Also, what about now? Has the evolutionary process stopped just before any observations could be made? If, as the Darwinists say, that continuous evolution is a fact, there should be plenty of examples to point to that are in the stages of transition, now, all around us, as well as proof in the past, in the fossil record. I want to see the half fish/half amphibian example, and, as Ranganathan says, "not a single fossil with part fins ... part feet has been found."
Why are so many afraid to question what has become a religion, "Darwinism"?????
Evolution fails on so many levels: How did the first cells "evolve" from the primordial soup? How did bats evolve echolocation? If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and apes? Why haven't alligators evolved thumbs in 250,000,000 years? Why haven't dolphins flown to the Moon?
DNA could have existed long before life itself
The idea that life began with RNA – simpler than DNA – looks less certain now that a DNA-like molecule has been made from basic compoundswww.newscientist.com
How Did Life Begin? RNA That Replicates Itself Indefinitely Developed For First Time
One of the most enduring questions is how life could have begun on Earth. Molecules that can make copies of themselves are thought to be crucial to understanding this process as they provide the basis for heritability, a critical characteristic of living systems. New findings could inform...www.sciencedaily.com
While none of the above research is proof of evolution they all raise some interesting questions and possibilities.
They fail miserably! The odds of DNA or RNA forming RANDOMLY
Funny that some scientists have already shown that components of RNA and DNA do form out from compounds that are widely accepted as being present in the seas of prehistoric earth.
From one of the links I posted
In the current study, published in Nature, the researchers simulated the conditions on a primordial rocky Earth with shallow ponds in the lab. They dissolved chemicals that form RNA in water, then dried them out and heated them, then they simulated the early sun’s rays by exposing them to UV radiation.
In this recreation of early Earth geochemistry, intermediates in the synthesis of two of the building blocks of RNA were simultaneously also converted into two of the building blocks of DNA.
"Perhaps the most discouraging criticism has come from chemists, who have spoiled the prebiotic soup by showing that organic compounds produced on the early earth would be subject to chemical reactions making them unsuitable for constructing life. In all probability, the prebiotic soup could never have existed, and without it there is no reason to believe that the production of small amounts of some amino acids by electrical charge in a reducing atmosphere had anything to do with the origin of life."
Ibid.
IOW opinion
