State Religion: You cannot dirty the pride flag that is painted on a street without being arrested

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Again. This applies to private property. Something painted on the street isn’t private property.

Wrong. Again.

It applies to private and public property.

 

[Concerned American]

What “facts”. If there’s a law distinguishing painted road decorations as different than all other road markings should be easy to post. That you haven’t tell us everything we need to know.

Spokane Arts, LGBTQIA advocates create Pride art in downtown Spokane

The mural, which features a large Pride flag, was painted directly on the street surface at the intersection of Spokane Falls Boulevard and Howard Street.

www.krem.com

 

[Couchpotato]

Wrong. Again.

It applies to private and public property.

No it doenst. Me damaging your property is treated differently under the law than me damaging public property

 

[Concerned American]

No it doenst. Me damaging your property is treated differently under the law than me damaging public property

I'm waiting for an serious accident to happen as a result of the lack of traction on that excessive paint. But WTF, the taxpayers of Spokane have plenty of money to shell out for stupid fee-good projects gone wrong. I steer clear of that county at all costs.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No it doenst. Me damaging your property is treated differently under the law than me damaging public property

Nope. Sorry. It can be charged as criminal mischief in Florida.

You're wrong and should probably stop talking. Instead go read up on the charges and past convictions for when someone vandalizes a school or park.

 

[Lord-Humungus]

What about all the people in government and society who were offended by skid marks on a street? That’s the better question

Well doing burnouts on a public street is a safety risk to everyone involved so yeah you would think anyone doing so should be a concern to government and society. Doing it on top of a City sanctioned art display is just moronic.

 

[Lord-Humungus]

No it doenst. Me damaging your property is treated differently under the law than me damaging public property

So you agree damaging public property is a crime, like say a city approved piece of art.

 

[Couchpotato]

So you agree damaging public property is a crime, like say a city approved piece of art.

I agree that the government should treat this

Anand this

The same.

That said the second one shouldn’t be on the street to begin with.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I agree that the government should treat this

View attachment 965911

Anand this

View attachment 965912


The same.

That said the second one shouldn’t be on the street to begin with.

Thus admitting you don't think they should be treated the same.

You must be immune to cognitive dissonance.

 

[Couchpotato]

Thus admitting you don't think they should be treated the same.

You must be immune to cognitive dissonance.

You must be immune to reading comprehension.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Keep your hands to yourself and respect other people’s property isn’t that hard, unless you’re a closed minded bigot

It's painted in a ******* public street. It doesn't belong to anyone, it belongs to EVERYONE.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Well doing burnouts on a public street is a safety risk to everyone involved so yeah you would think anyone doing so should be a concern to government and society. Doing it on top of a City sanctioned art display is just moronic.

If you want to give them a ticket, that’s fine.

A felony? That’s state-imposed intimidation/punishment for defacing their religious symbol.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Thus admitting you don't think they should be treated the same.

You must be immune to cognitive dissonance.

?

How does wanting to treat things the same mean not wanting to treat them the same?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You must be immune to reading comprehension.

If they were treated the same, then no problem with either of them being there.

I.E., the opposite of what you said.

Yeah, you fked up again. Even when you try to deceive, the truth still comes out.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

?

How does wanting to treat things the same mean not wanting to treat them the same?

How does saying one shouldn't even be allowed to be there mean treating them the same?

Jesus, are they putting lead in paint again?

 

[Couchpotato]

If they were treated the same, then no problem with either of them being there.

I.E., the opposite of what you said.

Yeah, you fked up again. Even when you try to deceive, the truth still comes out.

One is a political statement which the Government shouldn’t be involved in. They should be treated the same under the law if they are going to put it on the road though. Goodness you are dumb.

 

[Lord-Humungus]

If you want to give them a ticket, that’s fine.

A felony? That’s state-imposed intimidation/punishment for defacing their religious symbol.

That’s just the bullshit you choose to believe. The same folks who went ape shit when the public property they liked was vandalized are seeing no problem with this vandalism. Like then don’t do the crime if you are going to be a ***** when caught.

 

[Couchpotato]

How does saying one shouldn't even be allowed to be there mean treating them the same?

Jesus, are they putting lead in paint again?

The intent of the “pride” flag crosswalk is political. The Government should never be pushing political statements via the public money, unless it’s going to do it for all points of view regardless of how objectionable some people might find them. Why aren’t there crosswalk flags for (insert political movement here)?

 

[Lord-Humungus]

One is a political statement which the Government shouldn’t be involved in. They should be treated the same under the law if they are going to put it on the road though. Goodness you are dumb.

Damn that government of freedom embracing the freedom to love and live how you choose. Can’t have that shit.

 

[Couchpotato]

That’s just the bullshit you choose to believe. The same folks who went ape shit when the public property they liked was vandalized are seeing no problem with this vandalism. Like then don’t do the crime if you are going to be a ***** when caught.

Were the people who defaced the confederate generals statues charged with a felony?