Stalin

Why did you do it?
Robert , you under collective attack of 3 Muscovite Jihadi 🇷🇺imperialists. They are not like me and you, they get paid 30 rubles for all our reposts. Remember it

Former Muscovite 🇷🇺trolls expose misinformation operations


ps

 
What communist country did you serve?
Bolshevik empire
he represents the Mongol - Muscovite, totalitarian hell ...




"Let us begin with this evident fact:
🇷🇺
Muscovy does not belong at all to Europe, but to Asia. It follows that judging Muscovy and the Muscovites by our European standards is a mistake to be avoided."—gonzague de reynold, 19501
In methodological terms, one should de-Europeanise any analysis of
🇷🇺
Muscovy policy.— thomas gomart, 20062 "
 
A few points.

Hitler killed 6 million Jews and five million other people (Gays, communists, Roma, Sinti, the disabled, etc.) Not to mention triggering a war that killed 70 million worldwide.

I think you meant to say Stalin killed 20,000,000 of his own people, but those numbers are largely bullshit, and the only way you get close to that is if you throw in famines like the Holodomor in Ukraine. Kind of like the Bircher crazies screamed about Mao killing 60 million, but you only get those numbers if you include the famine of 1959-62. (Forgetting that Famines were regular events in China, Russia, and pretty much the rest of the world prior to the Communists.)

Here's the problem with the "20 million" figure. Census figures from the USSR just don't hold it up.

The population of the USSR in 1926 was 147 million. By 1939, the eve of the war, despite all the purges and famines, the population increased to 170 million. By 1959, despite the War, but including the territories the USSR annexed, the population increased to 208 million.


The numbers, just don't add up.

Not to say Stalin wasn't a ruthless bastard (he was), that he did a lot of damage to the USSR (dumb collectivization that led to famines, purging his best officers so no one knew what they were doing when Hitler invaded).
Stalin´s Census :lol: ....you must be JOKING ...
1746663396340.webp


uzjacyc70xj61.webp
 
You side with wrong too often to not be disturbing. Something's wrong with you, boy. :puke:
Idk about you, but our ancestors killed Nazis, and that weighed on them for the rest of their lives.
What say you to that? That happened, it's a fact. I have a friend that has 3 dried Nazi officer ears on a dogtag chain.
I guarantee he still has that, because it's his. His dad gave that to him, and a Luger, and 2 Mausers, and a
semi-auto thing that looks good but jams. Also ammo and all kinds of other stuff.
That Luger jams with the Nazi ammo too, but whatever. He let us shoot it, but we ended up shooting with our own stuff.
AGREE WITH YOU 100%, this 🇰🇵guy is fishy as the hell. ps have you seen this film ?

 
What the hell was that? Stalin did not help Poland, he with Hitler invaded Poland.

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

The problem with diplomacy in the 1930s was that the West gave Hitler (and to a lesser extent Mussolini and the Japanese) a free hand because they were more afraid of Stalin and his commies actually taking stuff away from Rich people. So time after time, they turned a blind eye, until Stalin realized it was better to cut his own deal with Hitler and buy more time.

Take Czechoslovakia. Stalin had a treaty with the Czechs to come to their aid as long as the French did as well. Instead, the French went along with the British in forcing the Czechs to make concessions that eventually led to the dismemberment of their country. It also caused Yugoslavia and Romania to put an end to the "Little Entente" Treaty to oppose German aggression.

So if you are Stalin, and you see a Hitler who has designs on more territory and an absolutely feckless West who has no interest in working with you, of course you are going to buy some time and strengthen your position by reaching an agreement with Hitler.

If anything, Stalin probably got too comfortable with is alliance of convenience.
 
I regret nothing for loving the above Dio post. :dunno:
Oh, it was so good back then. I used to walk past cops with a gun and they were jealous of me.
All legal and in America. Never listened to this back then.
It was Def Leppard and Maiden and others.
 
Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

The problem with diplomacy in the 1930s was that the West gave Hitler (and to a lesser extent Mussolini and the Japanese) a free hand because they were more afraid of Stalin and his commies actually taking stuff away from Rich people. So time after time, they turned a blind eye, until Stalin realized it was better to cut his own deal with Hitler and buy more time.

Take Czechoslovakia. Stalin had a treaty with the Czechs to come to their aid as long as the French did as well. Instead, the French went along with the British in forcing the Czechs to make concessions that eventually led to the dismemberment of their country. It also caused Yugoslavia and Romania to put an end to the "Little Entente" Treaty to oppose German aggression.

So if you are Stalin, and you see a Hitler who has designs on more territory and an absolutely feckless West who has no interest in working with you, of course you are going to buy some time and strengthen your position by reaching an agreement with Hitler.

If anything, Stalin probably got too comfortable with is alliance of convenience.
No!!! I believe I am an honest student of history Joe. When you rail against Mormons as you love to to do, you are not an honest student of history Joe.

It is no shock to me you also defend Stalin.
 
You side with wrong too often to not be disturbing. Something's wrong with you, boy. :puke:
Idk about you, but our ancestors killed Nazis, and that weighed on them for the rest of their lives.
What say you to that? That happened, it's a fact. I have a friend that has 3 dried Nazi officer ears on a dogtag chain.
I guarantee he still has that, because it's his. His dad gave that to him, and a Luger, and 2 Mausers, and a
semi-auto thing that looks good but jams. Also ammo and all kinds of other stuff.
That Luger jams with the Nazi ammo too, but whatever. He let us shoot it, but we ended up shooting with our own stuff.

My father fought in WWII, and he did it without committing any war crimes (which taking a body part from a slain enemy would be.)

Of course, there are no "good guys" in any war. Good people are sometimes forced to do horrible things, but there's nothing good about war, ever.

Nothing of which has much to do with my original point, which went right over your head.

That Stalin was a right bastard, but he was a bastard who probably saved the world from Hitler.
 
No!!! I believe I am an honest student of history Joe. When you rail against Mormons as you love to to do, you are not an honest student of history Joe.

There's not an objective way to look at your Cult's history that makes you look good.

Either Joseph Smith was talking to God (he wasn't) or he was a terrible person who used faith to abuse his followers.

And that's the honest truth.
 
Hitler also was a democratic socialist. So why are you supporting Stalin?
He was not a democratic socialist you moron he was the leader of the NSDAP democratic socialists in Germany at the time were put in Concentration camps like Dachau as political prisoners.
 
He was not a democratic socialist you moron he was the leader of the NSDAP democratic socialists in Germany at the time were put in Concentration camps like Dachau as political prisoners.
Back atcha moron. I would not call you that except you had to lay out an insult. You want to tell me Stalin was no communist because he murdered millions of them?
 
Either Joseph Smith was talking to God (he wasn't) or he was a terrible person who used faith to abuse his followers.
Joseph Smith was a teen when Moroni and him talked. Nobody says Smith chatted with GOD. Smith later created the church you hate so much. I don't hate you Joe. I feel sorry for you.
 
That Stalin was a right bastard, but he was a bastard who probably saved the world from Hitler.
Stalin sure got rid of over 6 million Russians. Just your kind of person Joe from what you tell them here.
 
How badly was FDR's mental impairment when he referred to Stalin constantly as "Uncle Joe"? Was FDR really in charge in his 3rd and short 4th term or was the U.S. governed by a phantom unelected government?
Have you asked a similar question about the other Joe? What phantoms did govern the country when the sob was supposed to be in charge?
 
Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

The problem with diplomacy in the 1930s was that the West gave Hitler (and to a lesser extent Mussolini and the Japanese) a free hand because they were more afraid of Stalin and his commies actually taking stuff away from Rich people. So time after time, they turned a blind eye, until Stalin realized it was better to cut his own deal with Hitler and buy more time.

Take Czechoslovakia. Stalin had a treaty with the Czechs to come to their aid as long as the French did as well. Instead, the French went along with the British in forcing the Czechs to make concessions that eventually led to the dismemberment of their country. It also caused Yugoslavia and Romania to put an end to the "Little Entente" Treaty to oppose German aggression.

So if you are Stalin, and you see a Hitler who has designs on more territory and an absolutely feckless West who has no interest in working with you, of course you are going to buy some time and strengthen your position by reaching an agreement with Hitler.

If anything, Stalin probably got too comfortable with is alliance of convenience.
That's a bunch of criminal commie/ 🇷🇺 RT lies


How Putin weaponized WW2 and Victory Day, historian explains



That's why
🇷🇺
fascists are celebrating victory over fascism...

despot Putin on Friday again painted his enemies in Ukraine as “neo-Nazis,” even though the country has a Jewish president who lost relatives in the Holocaust and who heads a Western-backed, democratically elected government.


The Holocaust, World War II and Nazism have been important tools for Putin in his bid to legitimize Moscow imperialistic war in Ukraine, but
historians see their use as disinformation and a cynical ploy to further the Moscow leader’s aims.
 
Back
Top Bottom