Speaker Johnson Claims the ONLY Thing Delaying Release of Epstein Information ("if there is any delay at all") is . . .

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2021
Messages
26,943
Reaction score
23,500
Points
2,288
Location
Texas
The need to protect the identity of the victims.

10:22 to 11:22 (yes, a long answer):



Four questions:

Should every victim's name and identifying information in the released Epstein information be carefully redacted with an intent to err on the side of caution rather than air on the side of being so open that victims are re-victimized? Or will any redactions at all only leave you even more suspicious of a cover-up?

Should the names of adults mentioned in the documents, but not accused of any wrongdoing, be redacted?

Should the names of adults mentioned and accused or implied to have committed wrongdoing, but not convicted, be redacted?

If Kash Patel states, in upcoming Congressional testimony, that some names of adults mentioned in the documents and accused of wrongdoing cannot be released because there is an ongoing investigation targetting them for possible prosecution, will you accept that answer as a justification for redaction?

The questions are only a guide. Feel free to answer some, all or none.

Answer as you please, please!
 
The need to protect the identity of the victims.

10:22 to 11:22 (yes, a long answer):



Four questions:

Should every victim's name and identifying information in the released Epstein information be carefully redacted with an intent to err on the side of caution rather than air on the side of being so open that victims are re-victimized? Or will any redactions at all only leave you even more suspicious of a cover-up?

Should the names of adults mentioned in the documents, but not accused of any wrongdoing, be redacted?

Should the names of adults mentioned and accused or implied to have committed wrongdoing, but not convicted, be redacted?

If Kash Patel states, in upcoming Congressional testimony, that some names of adults mentioned in the documents and accused of wrongdoing cannot be released because there is an ongoing investigation targetting them for possible prosecution, will you accept that answer as a justification for redaction?

The questions are only a guide. Feel free to answer some, all or none.

Answer as you please, please!

MAGA lies.™️
 
The victims held a press conference. :rolleyes:

Another Democrat just won another landslide election in Virginia. Another will be in office by the end of the month. Those are the two Democrat votes Massie and Khanna are talking about.
 
Can you imagine being one of Epstein's young victims who willingly took part in these parties but now are ashamed...
You love your job and family and don't want to lose either just to satisfy dems sick fantasies about Trump...
Of course you wouldn't want the files released...
Calm down dems...
 
I am not going to believe anything that is in those files.

It's been too long and I don't trust those in charge to not doctor things to their advantage.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom