Zone1 South Carolina mayor bans nativity scenes in public

protectionist

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
61,559
Reaction score
21,705
Points
2,250
Wacky woke mayor of Mullins, South Carolina (where there's a Christian church on every corner), Miko Pickett, demanded the removal of a nativity scene as part of a marketplace Christmas decoration, because it violated "separation of church and state." (of which there is not a word of in the Constitution).

The Mullins Beautification Committee spent two weeks in late November getting everything ready for the marketplace's first Christmas season, paying for decorations out of their own pockets. They added one more item to complete the scene: a modest three-by-four-foot Nativity display showing the birth of Jesus Christ.

Woke mayor, supported by a few equally wokey city councilmembers, insisted the nativity scene must go. The Committee held firm and refused to remove the display. Good for them/

This seems to be another unpleasant doing of the left, as it digs its unapproval hole deeper & deeper every time they open their mouths.
Left-wing churches in Massachusetts and Illinois are staging "protest Nativities" showing ICE agents arresting the Holy Family — grotesque political stunts that use the birth of Christ to attack Trump's border enforcement.

In Ohio, city officials blocked a private citizen from setting up a live Nativity scene on public property, despite allowing other forms of public expression on the same veteran's green.

The attacks on Christian symbols accelerate every December while officials bend over backward accommodating every other religious tradition. You want a menorah in the town square? No problem. Kwanzaa display at city hall? Go right ahead. But put up a Nativity scene celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ in a town where churches sit on every corner? Suddenly government lawyers discover the "separation of church and state", that doesn't exist anywhere in the Constitution.

 
Allowing a nativity does not violate constitutional protections. Allowing it while not allowing other beliefs to express themselves also would.

Even then, none of this might not apply to a "marketplace".
 
Wacky woke mayor of Mullins, South Carolina (where there's a Christian church on every corner), Miko Pickett, demanded the removal of a nativity scene as part of a marketplace Christmas decoration, because it violated "separation of church and state." (of which there is not a word of in the Constitution).

The Mullins Beautification Committee spent two weeks in late November getting everything ready for the marketplace's first Christmas season, paying for decorations out of their own pockets. They added one more item to complete the scene: a modest three-by-four-foot Nativity display showing the birth of Jesus Christ.

Woke mayor, supported by a few equally wokey city councilmembers, insisted the nativity scene must go. The Committee held firm and refused to remove the display. Good for them/

This seems to be another unpleasant doing of the left, as it digs its unapproval hole deeper & deeper every time they open their mouths.
Left-wing churches in Massachusetts and Illinois are staging "protest Nativities" showing ICE agents arresting the Holy Family — grotesque political stunts that use the birth of Christ to attack Trump's border enforcement.

In Ohio, city officials blocked a private citizen from setting up a live Nativity scene on public property, despite allowing other forms of public expression on the same veteran's green.

The attacks on Christian symbols accelerate every December while officials bend over backward accommodating every other religious tradition. You want a menorah in the town square? No problem. Kwanzaa display at city hall? Go right ahead. But put up a Nativity scene celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ in a town where churches sit on every corner? Suddenly government lawyers discover the "separation of church and state", that doesn't exist anywhere in the Constitution.

in SC that ain't gonna fly .. and its already getting push back ..


 
Wacky woke mayor of Mullins, South Carolina (where there's a Christian church on every corner), Miko Pickett, demanded the removal of a nativity scene as part of a marketplace Christmas decoration, because it violated "separation of church and state." (of which there is not a word of in the Constitution).

Separation of church and state DOES NOT mean that the state cannot have any religion or religious symbols for its own (Washington DC is FILLED with references to God in fact, the entire city may be laid out according to masonic symbolism), it merely means that the State should have no say in YOUR religion, and that is EXACTLY what this idiot is doing by trying to ban Christians displaying Nativity scenes.
 
Why do nice people, who want to exhibit a Nativity scene in their town, elect an asshole like this mayor? I expect this same question to be asked in NYC in 2026.
 
There is a peculiar form of anti-Christian activism in the US that correlates perfectly with left-wing political ideology. This is particularly noticeable during Christmas, where any recognition of its namesake is considered impermissibly offensive. What is it about these people that causes them to become enraged over historical events?
 
Wacky woke mayor of Mullins, South Carolina (where there's a Christian church on every corner), Miko Pickett, demanded the removal of a nativity scene as part of a marketplace Christmas decoration, because it violated "separation of church and state." (of which there is not a word of in the Constitution).

The Mullins Beautification Committee spent two weeks in late November getting everything ready for the marketplace's first Christmas season, paying for decorations out of their own pockets. They added one more item to complete the scene: a modest three-by-four-foot Nativity display showing the birth of Jesus Christ.

Woke mayor, supported by a few equally wokey city councilmembers, insisted the nativity scene must go. The Committee held firm and refused to remove the display. Good for them/

This seems to be another unpleasant doing of the left, as it digs its unapproval hole deeper & deeper every time they open their mouths.
Left-wing churches in Massachusetts and Illinois are staging "protest Nativities" showing ICE agents arresting the Holy Family — grotesque political stunts that use the birth of Christ to attack Trump's border enforcement.

In Ohio, city officials blocked a private citizen from setting up a live Nativity scene on public property, despite allowing other forms of public expression on the same veteran's green.

The attacks on Christian symbols accelerate every December while officials bend over backward accommodating every other religious tradition. You want a menorah in the town square? No problem. Kwanzaa display at city hall? Go right ahead. But put up a Nativity scene celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ in a town where churches sit on every corner? Suddenly government lawyers discover the "separation of church and state", that doesn't exist anywhere in the Constitution.


I don't know what the marketplace is, but if it's private property, there's not a thing they can do about a Nativity
 
Allowing a nativity does not violate constitutional protections. Allowing it while not allowing other beliefs to express themselves also would.

Even then, none of this might not apply to a "marketplace".
.

What other beliefs have been banned from expressing them in Mullins, SC?

Be prepared to share proof.






.
 
There is a peculiar form of anti-Christian activism in the US that correlates perfectly with left-wing political ideology. This is particularly noticeable during Christmas, where any recognition of its namesake is considered impermissibly offensive. What is it about these people that causes them to become enraged over historical events?

Yet, every one of these woke commies gladly takes CHRISTMAS off work with pay.

If they had any integrity, they would work that day, or refuse payment for staying home.
 
Allowing a nativity does not violate constitutional protections. Allowing it while not allowing other beliefs to express themselves also would.

Even then, none of this might not apply to a "marketplace".
What part of a “Christmas” holiday celebration do you not understand?
 
Wacky woke mayor of Mullins, South Carolina (where there's a Christian church on every corner), Miko Pickett, demanded the removal of a nativity scene as part of a marketplace Christmas decoration, because it violated "separation of church and state." (of which there is not a word of in the Constitution).

The Mullins Beautification Committee spent two weeks in late November getting everything ready for the marketplace's first Christmas season, paying for decorations out of their own pockets. They added one more item to complete the scene: a modest three-by-four-foot Nativity display showing the birth of Jesus Christ.

Woke mayor, supported by a few equally wokey city councilmembers, insisted the nativity scene must go. The Committee held firm and refused to remove the display. Good for them/

This seems to be another unpleasant doing of the left, as it digs its unapproval hole deeper & deeper every time they open their mouths.
Left-wing churches in Massachusetts and Illinois are staging "protest Nativities" showing ICE agents arresting the Holy Family — grotesque political stunts that use the birth of Christ to attack Trump's border enforcement.

In Ohio, city officials blocked a private citizen from setting up a live Nativity scene on public property, despite allowing other forms of public expression on the same veteran's green.

The attacks on Christian symbols accelerate every December while officials bend over backward accommodating every other religious tradition. You want a menorah in the town square? No problem. Kwanzaa display at city hall? Go right ahead. But put up a Nativity scene celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ in a town where churches sit on every corner? Suddenly government lawyers discover the "separation of church and state", that doesn't exist anywhere in the Constitution.
Honestly, I’m against the display of ANY religious symbology ANYWHERE that it can be seen from public property.

Religion, like sexuality, politics, etc… should be PRIVATE ideology and activity and should be kept from the public space.
 
Honestly, I’m against the display of ANY religious symbology ANYWHERE that it can be seen from public property.

Religion, like sexuality, politics, etc… should be PRIVATE ideology and activity and should be kept from the public space.
.

What, do you want churches torn down?









.
 
Honestly, I’m against the display of ANY religious symbology ANYWHERE that it can be seen from public property.

Religion, like sexuality, politics, etc… should be PRIVATE ideology and activity and should be kept from the public space.
You want everyone to turn in their crosses & St Christopher medals ?

1766619960062.webp
 
15th post
Yet, every one of these woke commies gladly takes CHRISTMAS off work with pay.

they are not taking a desert religions day off - its a national holiday / new year.

they are celebrating the holidays / new year - prove what day jesus was born or there was a nativity at all that is not entirely madeup. * no one knew mary and joseph till 30 years later w/ jesus's notoriety.
 
that is false -

separation of church and state: means neither may have a say in the others affairs ... or let the state preach from the church pulpit as it pleases.

Then why does the State offer tax free exemption for churches?

Why does the State use churches for places of voting?

Why does the State have the President and members of the Supreme Court swear on the Bible?

Quantrill
 
Back
Top Bottom