RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
- 290
- Thread starter
- #261
Funny chit. Trump lies every day.we did? what lie?I am sorry, but a Trump supporter has no ground to complain about anyone else lying..No, I don't "say" what I want to believe. I point out FACTS!
Opinion | Study: 91 percent of recent network Trump coverage has been negative
So you see, it's much more than just an opinion; it's a study.
So, let me help you a bit, me poor ignorant con troll. It is not your fault entirely that you are ignorant. Or that you are stupid. Let me give you some facts.
: 1. Journalistic proceedures will alway require that you use impartial sources. As I did with FactCheck.org. Because the source is known to be impartial, that makes it a likely source for TRUTH. This study was printed in the Washington Post. So, on the face of it, that is a good source.
However, STRIKE !:
The study was conducted by the conservative Media Research Center, a right wing web site with a history of being far from impartial. Or, put another way, they are a nut case right wing web site.
Then, It is important to determine what a study proves. And that you are honest with what that is.
Strike 2: The study does not suggest, as you do, that the publications were untrue in saying what they did about Trump. What they said, as far as can be understood, is absolutely true.
Then, you need to be honest about the intent of a study's.
Strike 3. You suggested the articles looked at by the study were slanted toward making Trump look bad. There was no indication that any intent was there to slant the news. It appears that the articles simply stated what the truth was and what happened.
So, there you go. Your mistake in using a very slanted source and making it appear that the studies were unfair to poor Donald Trump and therefor their findings are unfounded. They simply looked at very unpopular actions, outright lies, and actions that actual citizens did not support. Sorry you did not like the fact that those doing articles about Trump told the truth. Now, if you have found areas where they lied, then let us know. Otherwise, you have again just agreed with a nut case right wing source of info.
Great. So why don't you post a left-wing source that challenges that?
The truth of the matter is only right sources will inform people of the truth. The left-wing is not going to do a study on what they are getting away with. And you really don't need a study to prove anything. Just turn on any other outlet outside of Fox and tell us how much positive reporting they did on Trump.
The MSM tells the truth. Okay, but how much time do they dedicate their so-called truth about Trump??? As much time as they do with Hillary, Comey, the FISA warrants and applications?
Let me ask, is a Harvard study up to your expectations?
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative
How about NPR and Pew? Too right-wing for you?
Study: News Coverage Of Trump More Negative Than For Other Presidents
The MSM just plain lies. They don't even bother any longer trying to convince anyone they are honest or impartial
You voted for the liar-in-chief.
So STFU asshole.
"I know more about ISIS than the Generals"