Sometimes Democrat History Rhymes.....

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
131,874
Reaction score
67,668
Points
2,615
Location
Brooklyn, NY
“History Doesn't Repeat Itself, but It Often Rhymes” – Mark Twain.

.....sometimes it does repeat.


1. What we are witnessing today is a civil war in the Democrat Party between the establishment Democrats, the moderates, and the Radical Communist Violent element. The former wishes to jettison the insane woke, open border, violent Far Left agenda, with the view that being openly communist will not play well in a national election.


2. The Bolsheviks and Mensheviks were the two main factions of the party which led to the Russian Revolution. Both groups subscribed to Marxism, but but they diverged on the methods that they believed would lead to world-wide socialism.


3. The Bolsheviks had a more tightly disciplined group of radical revolutionaries. The Mensheviks favored a more inclusive democratic party with more opinions allowed.


4. The Bolshevikss believed in a more radical and violent revolution to achieve socialism, sans any capitalism, with the central aim of abolishing private property at any cost (genocide). Mensheviks believed in a more gradual, political approach, based on co-opting the political process.....that included capitalism (crony capitalism).
One need be ignorant of history to miss the comparison with the war in the Democrat Party today.



5.Now the Bolsheviks have taken over the party.

About half of the Party’s supporter always came from the interchangeable terms socialist/communist/Progressive/ etc. Professor Kengor said this, describing the Menshevik element:

"The progressive left, and the liberal left, while not themselves communists, share many of the same sympathies, such of redistribution of wealth, and worker’s rights, nationalizations of industry, etc, but are not quite as far left as the communists, and would not go to the same lengths as the communists to achieve their goals. This does not mean, though, that the help of these dupes is not necessary in order for the communists to achieve victory. Even at their peak, in the ‘30’s, the Communist Party of the United States never had more than 100 thousand members: so deception of the ‘dupes’ was critical. "
Dr. Paul Kengor, Hoover Institution, Stanford “DUPES: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century


1759760856936.webp
 
" It became clear that the party was split between two groups, the Bolsheviks (‘majority’) and the Mensheviks (‘minority’).

Both groups were enthusiasts for the destruction of capitalism and the overthrow of the Tsarist regime, but the Mensheviks, led by Martov, favoured a large, loosely organised democratic party whose members could agree to differ on many points. They were prepared to work with the liberals in Russia and they had scruples about the use of violence. The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, were hardline revolutionaries who would not have known a scruple if it bought them a drink.



In his notes at the time Lenin called his group ‘hards’ and his opponents ‘softs’.
When a delegate lamented that uncomradely attitudes were spoiling the congress, Lenin sharply replied that, on the contrary, he relished a good open fight instead of endless inconclusive talk. His attitude was attacked as elitist and tyrannical. The youthful Trotsky, now and for years to come a Menshevik, reportedly told Lenin at one point, ‘That’s dictatorship you’re advocating,’ to which Lenin replied, ‘There is no other way.’"



Today, the "hards," the Bolsheviks, aim to keep the government closed.
 
" It became clear that the party was split between two groups, the Bolsheviks (‘majority’) and the Mensheviks (‘minority’).
Before this split, these factions were united in their attempts to delegitimize the current government. Then they used anti-war sentiment to foment a poplar revolution. This was followed by phony elections which set the stage for a Communist dictatorship.

The same tactics have been used against the Trump administrations. Fortunately, our Constitutional dispersal of authority among the States has prevented the same outcome. So far.
 
A war in the democrat party? No more than any other point in history. That is a fact.

The democrat party will never change or be taken over.

There is no democrat MAGA
 
A war in the democrat party? No more than any other point in history. That is a fact.

The democrat party will never change or be taken over.

There is no democrat MAGA
Wise of you to come to me for an education, but even my expertise has its limitations.

Clearly you could not comprehend the OP.

You need more help than my limited time here can provide.



I just documented the history and the pattern.

In a more limited explanation, you are a moron.



The Coming Democratic Civil War​

1759782740852.webp
The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com › ideas › archive › 2025/05
May 25, 2025 — A civil war has broken out among the Democratic wonks. The casus belli is a new set of ideas known as the abundance agenda.


 
Wise of you to come to me for an education, but even my expertise has its limitations.
No, your expertise is fine, nobody does a cut and paste from webpages as nice as your cut/paste

Your limitation is you dont have your own library, this is one wall of mine.

If you zoom on I bet you will find the classics on Marxism and those people nobody but you remember, who were they, the bullfullshits?

20230919_230315.webp
 
No, your expertise is fine, nobody does a cut and paste from webpages as nice as your cut/paste

Your limitation is you dont have your own library, this is one wall of mine.

If you zoom on I bet you will find the classics on Marxism and those people nobody but you remember, who were they, the bullfullshits?

View attachment 1170542
I notice you didn't repeat
"A war in the democrat party? No more than any other point in history. That is a fact.

The democrat party will never change or be taken over."


See, you learned something today.
 
Yep, I got a huge digital library as well. Books from before the copyright laws. Good for pre-great war israel information
Seems you don't use any or it, or one would expect more astute posts.

Have you tried reading any of those books?
 
A war in the democrat party? No more than any other point in history. That is a fact.

The democrat party will never change or be taken over.

There is no democrat MAGA

No MAGA, but they do want to take the party back to their glory days of the 1820s-1860s.
 
Back
Top Bottom