Solution of wave-particle duality, perceptual model

[Wise47]

The key to solving the wave-particle duality is the statement that the wave nature is revealed in fast motion, and in relative stillness we are dealing with particle nature. In fact, similarly to contraction and dilation in special relativity, a wave phenomenon occurs when particles quickly move. Particles in rapid motion turn into waves, and in relative stillness they turn into particles.
I will allow myself to describe Bishop Berkeley's theory as a perceptual theory. It assumes that things and phenomena that we observe directly are systems of impressions. Thus, we have direct access only to impressions and they are the actual building blocks of reality, and the assumption that something exists beyond impressions is an unjustified speculation. Things and phenomena owe their constancy, stability and subjection to specific laws to the perception of God the Father. This perceptual theory can provide an answer to the riddle of wave-particle duality. Namely, because the wave phenomenon appears in rapid motion, it is related to the theory of Father's perception in such a way that God the Father simply perceives rapidly moving particles less well because they are more difficult to observe in such rapid motion. Thus, particles essentially blur, clouds are created such as the electron cloud in an atom. In this way, wave-particle duality can be explained on the basis of the perceptual theory.

Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2023

about the author, My name is Gregory Podgorniak (brn. 01.1977, Szczecinek, West Pomerania, Poland). I am working on field of natural as well as social sciences. During philosophical studies at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (1996-1999) I was actively act in student scientific organisation, got a scientific scholarship, and one from my articles titled Circulus vitiosus and fourfold petitio principii in the system of Descartes was published in Humanistic Drafts of Publishing House of Humaniora Foundation in Poznan, no. 6, 1998. Unfortunately certain fate events made impossible to me continuing studies to master's and later doctor's degree. Thence I was forced to be content only with a title of bachelor.
Thanks to deep and penetrating researchings I was able to establish indisputably some number of my past incarnations reaching of ancient period, these data are certain, these incarnations are: Auguste Comte (1798-1857) French philosopher and sociologist, Edme Mariotte (1620-1684) French physicist and meteorologist, Aenesidemus (1 st century BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Arcesilaus (315-241 BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Gorgias (485-380 BC) Greek sophist.


email contact: podgorniakgre@gmail.com

above text comes from site: New horizons in physics
my other works you can find here: Research by Gregory Podgorniak

 

[toobfreak]

The key to solving the wave-particle duality is the statement that the wave nature is revealed in fast motion, and in relative stillness we are dealing with particle nature. In fact, similarly to contraction and dilation in special relativity, a wave phenomenon occurs when particles quickly move. Particles in rapid motion turn into waves, and in relative stillness they turn into particles.

Isn't it more apt just to say that unlocalized, they /behave/ as waves, but localized to a particular spacetime coordinate, the wave function collapses to a point (particle) because the wave function is a /statistical property/ of the motion? In other words, the wave function is still there, but just contained in a 0,0 spacetime cartesian coordinate whose motion in spacetime allows the propagation of the wave, which is really just the probability effect on space the particle (quanta) has when moving in time, which really reduces the particle down to a wave with a high probability of 1,1 in any given point of spacetime when fixed in space?

I will allow myself to describe Bishop Berkeley's theory as a perceptual theory.

Isn't rationalizing wave/particle measurements as a function of perception really just a way of rationalizing the irreconcilable?

God the Father simply perceives rapidly moving particles less well because they are more difficult to observe in such rapid motion.

No particle in the cosmos is moving so fast as to present God with difficulty in discerning its true nature because God is He Who Put The Particle There In The First Place.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Much like parking a hollow, gigantic sphere in orbit around Earth that perfectly eclipses the Sun, the collapse of the Wave Function is another not too subtle way of telling us that this is a created reality.

 

[scruffy]

Perception has nothing to do with it. The universe continues with or without anyone's perception.

 

[toobfreak]

Perception has nothing to do with it. The universe continues with or without anyone's perception.

I think he meant to use the word "perception" interchangeably with observation, so the question becomes, can we do science without observation? While it is a given that observation is an indispensable part of the scientific process for there can be no science without people involved making observations and observation, perception, etc., are part of what determines "reality" as seen by the observer, if anyone were to do the double-slit experiments wholly mechanically generating the results with automation, would not the results still show particles when frozen in time and waves when frozen in space?