rtwngAvngr
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2004
- 15,755
- 515
- 48
- Banned
- #21
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
In some respects, it probably should be. In fact, alot of the republican party pushes that without realizing it when they make the argument for the war on terror. How could our founding fathers have realized jet airliners and nuclear weapons back then?
The framework of the constitution should remain the same but adaptations need to occur to respond to the progress of evolution, both good and bad, so that our country can grow and prosper.
I agree with this dk. How odd. I wonder if bully agrees that any aspect of the constitution should remain constant. He villifies constancy itself. What a fruit.