CDZ Social media has become too big to remain private.... YES or NO?

[Donald H]

How Popular Is Donald Trump?

FiveThirtyEight is tracking Donald Trump’s approval ratings throughout his presidency.

projects.fivethirtyeight.com

According to the American people, half of whom are racists, the worst and the best.

 

[Donald H]

And back on topic: Fascist regimes are always the quickest to condemn the media, and usually the first to resort to censoring and even assassinations of media persons.

 

[Correll]

And back on topic: Fascist regimes are always the quickest to condemn the media, and usually the first to resort to censoring and even assassinations of media persons.

So, since fascists regimes were anti-press, it is impossible to voice any legitimate criticism of the media, in your mind?

 

[Donald H]

And back on topic: Fascist regimes are always the quickest to condemn the media, and usually the first to resort to censoring and even assassinations of media persons.

So, since fascists regimes were anti-press, it is impossible to voice any legitimate criticism of the media, in your mind?

No, not at all. Criticize all you like and try to find some politically unbiased reason.

So many American wankers are getting so pathetic! The only you aren't a joke to the rest of the world is when you start bombing people in foreign lands.

 

[hadit]

No one is taking away your free speech. The 1st amendment does not give you rights to private property. It protects you from being silenced by the gov't.

Yes sir. I do support removing their (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube) special legal protections for which true platforms are eligible as they are certainly publishers and NOT unbiased platforms. This forum is a platform, for example.

They are not publishers. They allow users to publish.

In the same way a newspaper allows readers to publish letters to the editor. IOW, they control the content by choosing who gets to publish and who gets banned for their opinions.