Social Justice Mathematics Class - Now a Reality in Public Schools

[The2ndAmendment]

These mentally disturbed adults are intentionally indoctrinating young children to embrace homosexuality, transgenderism and "queer" for pretty much any other sexual act not covered LGBT.

It's time these fecal-matter-lickers and rectum-plungers be put in jail. They are open about sexualizing young children. These are people that are sexually disturbed, why would you want sexually disturbed people around your children. These are abominations that prefer having a dick stuck in their ass, and then sucking their own shit off of it, instead of putting it where nature intends --- a life-producing vaginal canal.

ORONTO, April 24, 2015 -- A lesbian teacher ‘married’ to another woman revealed at a pro-gay teachers’ conference earlier this month how she teaches grade 4-5 students to accept homosexuality through what she called “social justice” math.

Alicia Gunn, an elementary public school teacher in Mississauga, Ontario, told attendees at the April 10 conference in Toronto’s City Hall that injecting LGBTQ issues into the classroom, especially in math, helps students as young as nine “disrupt the single story that many of our kids have about LGBTQ families.”

When asked by one of the workshop attendees if she first asks parents’ permission before bringing homosexual issues up in class, Gunn responded that she does not, but she makes sure to teach her students about numerous social justice issues so that no parent can accuse her of focusing on homosexuality, which she said she likes to “hide” in her lessons.

Lesbian I use math class to teach young kids about homosexuality so I can hide it from parents News LifeSite


Radical Math

 

[AntiParty]

Alexander the "Great" would have something to say about this.

Gays showed up recently.

They certainly weren't oppressed as a class a long time ago (R)ight?

If dudes have butt sex or women have scissor sex the world will end. Bible.

Crazy how much it happened before the CONTROL.

 

[emilynghiem]

These mentally disturbed adults are intentionally indoctrinating young children to embrace homosexuality, transgenderism and "queer" for pretty much any other sexual act not covered LGBT.

It's time these fecal-matter-lickers and rectum-plungers be put in jail. They are open about sexualizing young children. These are people that are sexually disturbed, why would you want sexually disturbed people around your children. These are abominations that prefer having a dick stuck in their ass, and then sucking their own shit off of it, instead of putting it where nature intends --- a life-producing vaginal canal.

ORONTO, April 24, 2015 -- A lesbian teacher ‘married’ to another woman revealed at a pro-gay teachers’ conference earlier this month how she teaches grade 4-5 students to accept homosexuality through what she called “social justice” math.

Alicia Gunn, an elementary public school teacher in Mississauga, Ontario, told attendees at the April 10 conference in Toronto’s City Hall that injecting LGBTQ issues into the classroom, especially in math, helps students as young as nine “disrupt the single story that many of our kids have about LGBTQ families.”

When asked by one of the workshop attendees if she first asks parents’ permission before bringing homosexual issues up in class, Gunn responded that she does not, but she makes sure to teach her students about numerous social justice issues so that no parent can accuse her of focusing on homosexuality, which she said she likes to “hide” in her lessons.

Lesbian I use math class to teach young kids about homosexuality so I can hide it from parents News LifeSite

As for math, if teachers would be punished for teaching appreciation of Christianity in schools, but rewarded for teaching acceptance of homosexuality, that's NOT teaching equality or equal respect and inclusion of cultural beliefs and ways of living.

That is NOT being objective where these are treated as "equal" values!


Radical Math[/QUOTE]

Now this is where I would have meetings with teachers and parents to agree how to teach or not teach certain things:
1. sex ed
2. creation vs evolution
3. prayers that have religious vs. universal language (the same way school plays often require word changes to avoid saying hell or damn, invocations can be changed to avoid words people dont agree to use either, like substituting source of life for Lord or God or substituting Justice for Jesus, or the public good or greater good in place of under God)
4. references to native americans, black slavery, etc. where it is agreed on in advance how this is taught

there are no shortcuts to working out these differences.
if they are not afraid to address LGBTQ they shouldn't be afraid of addressing racism or religion either.
Just talk it all out without fear or shame attached to Christianity if you are going to insist this for homosexuality
to be treated as an unstigmatized way that some people are. why not be open and inclusive of ALL such things.

If you already know these issue will come up in school, then have trained facilitators work out meetings and agreement IN ADVANCE concerning the presentations and materials.

Why not agree which things to be taught or which to keep optional and have parents bring
in their own teachers if they want certain things taught, and make those assemblies optional.

Why make this a conflict, why not allow for the different options, and give parents a choice
what they want or don't want their children to have lessons in. It should be like respecting a
vegan not to eat meat, or a Muslim not to eat pork. Why push things without or against Parents' permission.

If the point is to accommodate then accommodate and make everyone feel welcome and included in the input. If ppl don't agree on something, find a way to make that optional and separate the choices where no one is forced.

As for math, if teachers would be punished for teaching appreciation of Christianity in schools, but rewarded for teaching acceptance of homosexuality, that's NOT teaching equality or equal respect and inclusion of cultural beliefs and ways of living.

That is NOT being objective where these are treated as "equal" values!

 

[AntiParty]

These mentally disturbed adults are intentionally indoctrinating young children to embrace homosexuality, transgenderism and "queer" for pretty much any other sexual act not covered LGBT.

It's time these fecal-matter-lickers and rectum-plungers be put in jail. They are open about sexualizing young children. These are people that are sexually disturbed, why would you want sexually disturbed people around your children. These are abominations that prefer having a dick stuck in their ass, and then sucking their own shit off of it, instead of putting it where nature intends --- a life-producing vaginal canal.

ORONTO, April 24, 2015 -- A lesbian teacher ‘married’ to another woman revealed at a pro-gay teachers’ conference earlier this month how she teaches grade 4-5 students to accept homosexuality through what she called “social justice” math.

Alicia Gunn, an elementary public school teacher in Mississauga, Ontario, told attendees at the April 10 conference in Toronto’s City Hall that injecting LGBTQ issues into the classroom, especially in math, helps students as young as nine “disrupt the single story that many of our kids have about LGBTQ families.”

When asked by one of the workshop attendees if she first asks parents’ permission before bringing homosexual issues up in class, Gunn responded that she does not, but she makes sure to teach her students about numerous social justice issues so that no parent can accuse her of focusing on homosexuality, which she said she likes to “hide” in her lessons.

Lesbian I use math class to teach young kids about homosexuality so I can hide it from parents News LifeSite


Radical Math

Now this is where I would have meetings with teachers and parents to agree how to teach or not teach certain things:
1. sex ed
2. creation vs evolution
3. prayers that have religious vs. universal language (the same way school plays often require word changes to avoid saying hell or damn, invocations can be changed to avoid words people dont agree to use either, like substituting source of life for Lord or God or substituting Justice for Jesus, or the public good or greater good in place of under God)
4. references to native americans, black slavery, etc. where it is agreed on in advance how this is taught

there are no shortcuts to working out these differences.
if they are not afraid to address LGBTQ they shouldn't be afraid of addressing racism or religion either.
Just talk it all out without fear or shame attached to Christianity if you are going to insist this for homosexuality
to be treated as an unstigmatized way that some people are. why not be open and inclusive of ALL such things.

If you already know these issue will come up in school, then have trained facilitators work out
meetings and agreement IN ADVANCE concerning the presentations and materials.

Why not agree which things to be taught or which to keep optional and have parents bring
in their own teachers if they want certain things taught, and make those assemblies optional.

Why make this a conflict, why not allow for the different options, and give parents a choice
what they want or don't want their children to have lessons in. It should be like respecting a
vegan not to eat meat, or a Muslim not to eat pork. Why push things without or against Parents' permission.

if the point is to accommodate then accommodate and make everyone feel welcome and included in the input.
if ppl don't agree on something, find a way to make that optional and separate the choices wehre no one is forced.

 

[AntiParty]

These mentally disturbed adults are intentionally indoctrinating young children to embrace homosexuality, transgenderism and "queer" for pretty much any other sexual act not covered LGBT.

It's time these fecal-matter-lickers and rectum-plungers be put in jail. They are open about sexualizing young children. These are people that are sexually disturbed, why would you want sexually disturbed people around your children. These are abominations that prefer having a dick stuck in their ass, and then sucking their own shit off of it, instead of putting it where nature intends --- a life-producing vaginal canal.

ORONTO, April 24, 2015 -- A lesbian teacher ‘married’ to another woman revealed at a pro-gay teachers’ conference earlier this month how she teaches grade 4-5 students to accept homosexuality through what she called “social justice” math.

Alicia Gunn, an elementary public school teacher in Mississauga, Ontario, told attendees at the April 10 conference in Toronto’s City Hall that injecting LGBTQ issues into the classroom, especially in math, helps students as young as nine “disrupt the single story that many of our kids have about LGBTQ families.”

When asked by one of the workshop attendees if she first asks parents’ permission before bringing homosexual issues up in class, Gunn responded that she does not, but she makes sure to teach her students about numerous social justice issues so that no parent can accuse her of focusing on homosexuality, which she said she likes to “hide” in her lessons.

Lesbian I use math class to teach young kids about homosexuality so I can hide it from parents News LifeSite


Radical Math

Now this is where I would have meetings with teachers and parents to agree how to teach or not teach certain things:
1. sex ed
2. creation vs evolution
3. prayers that have religious vs. universal language (the same way school plays often require word changes to avoid saying hell or damn, invocations can be changed to avoid words people dont agree to use either, like substituting source of life for Lord or God or substituting Justice for Jesus, or the public good or greater good in place of under God)
4. references to native americans, black slavery, etc. where it is agreed on in advance how this is taught

there are no shortcuts to working out these differences.
if they are not afraid to address LGBTQ they shouldn't be afraid of addressing racism or religion either.
Just talk it all out without fear or shame attached to Christianity if you are going to insist this for homosexuality
to be treated as an unstigmatized way that some people are. why not be open and inclusive of ALL such things.

If you already know these issue will come up in school, then have trained facilitators work out
meetings and agreement IN ADVANCE concerning the presentations and materials.

Why not agree which things to be taught or which to keep optional and have parents bring
in their own teachers if they want certain things taught, and make those assemblies optional.

Why make this a conflict, why not allow for the different options, and give parents a choice
what they want or don't want their children to have lessons in. It should be like respecting a
vegan not to eat meat, or a Muslim not to eat pork. Why push things without or against Parents' permission.

if the point is to accommodate then accommodate and make everyone feel welcome and included in the input.
if ppl don't agree on something, find a way to make that optional and separate the choices wehre no one is forced.

I totally understand your perspective as, "Why not agree which things to be taught" but it IS teaching how to cope with blacks for racist whites when simply not being racist is the key.

 

[AntiParty]

These mentally disturbed adults are intentionally indoctrinating young children to embrace homosexuality, transgenderism and "queer" for pretty much any other sexual act not covered LGBT.

It's time these fecal-matter-lickers and rectum-plungers be put in jail. They are open about sexualizing young children. These are people that are sexually disturbed, why would you want sexually disturbed people around your children. These are abominations that prefer having a dick stuck in their ass, and then sucking their own shit off of it, instead of putting it where nature intends --- a life-producing vaginal canal.

ORONTO, April 24, 2015 -- A lesbian teacher ‘married’ to another woman revealed at a pro-gay teachers’ conference earlier this month how she teaches grade 4-5 students to accept homosexuality through what she called “social justice” math.

Alicia Gunn, an elementary public school teacher in Mississauga, Ontario, told attendees at the April 10 conference in Toronto’s City Hall that injecting LGBTQ issues into the classroom, especially in math, helps students as young as nine “disrupt the single story that many of our kids have about LGBTQ families.”

When asked by one of the workshop attendees if she first asks parents’ permission before bringing homosexual issues up in class, Gunn responded that she does not, but she makes sure to teach her students about numerous social justice issues so that no parent can accuse her of focusing on homosexuality, which she said she likes to “hide” in her lessons.

Lesbian I use math class to teach young kids about homosexuality so I can hide it from parents News LifeSite

As for math, if teachers would be punished for teaching appreciation of Christianity in schools, but rewarded for teaching acceptance of homosexuality, that's NOT teaching equality or equal respect and inclusion of cultural beliefs and ways of living.

That is NOT being objective where these are treated as "equal" values!


Radical Math

Now this is where I would have meetings with teachers and parents to agree how to teach or not teach certain things:
1. sex ed
2. creation vs evolution
3. prayers that have religious vs. universal language (the same way school plays often require word changes to avoid saying hell or damn, invocations can be changed to avoid words people dont agree to use either, like substituting source of life for Lord or God or substituting Justice for Jesus, or the public good or greater good in place of under God)
4. references to native americans, black slavery, etc. where it is agreed on in advance how this is taught

there are no shortcuts to working out these differences.
if they are not afraid to address LGBTQ they shouldn't be afraid of addressing racism or religion either.
Just talk it all out without fear or shame attached to Christianity if you are going to insist this for homosexuality
to be treated as an unstigmatized way that some people are. why not be open and inclusive of ALL such things.

If you already know these issue will come up in school, then have trained facilitators work out meetings and agreement IN ADVANCE concerning the presentations and materials.

Why not agree which things to be taught or which to keep optional and have parents bring
in their own teachers if they want certain things taught, and make those assemblies optional.

Why make this a conflict, why not allow for the different options, and give parents a choice
what they want or don't want their children to have lessons in. It should be like respecting a
vegan not to eat meat, or a Muslim not to eat pork. Why push things without or against Parents' permission.

If the point is to accommodate then accommodate and make everyone feel welcome and included in the input. If ppl don't agree on something, find a way to make that optional and separate the choices where no one is forced.

As for math, if teachers would be punished for teaching appreciation of Christianity in schools, but rewarded for teaching acceptance of homosexuality, that's NOT teaching equality or equal respect and inclusion of cultural beliefs and ways of living.

That is NOT being objective where these are treated as "equal" values![/QUOTE]

Let's break your post down into 4 parts. (not worth it, im tired)

Does it require everyone in America or the World to think like you with rules? Because the Preists that were taught sexuality should be ignored ended up having sex due to "rubber band affect".

Ignoring your sexuality is ignorance.

 

[emilynghiem]

Let's break your post down into 4 parts. (not worth it, im tired)

Does it require everyone in America or the World to think like you with rules? Because the Preists that were taught sexuality should be ignored ended up having sex due to "rubber band affect".

Ignoring your sexuality is ignorance.

AntiParty

Who said anything about ignoring the subject?
I said the OPPOSITE -- to address this transparently!
Even involve the PARENTS in addressing it.
Opening up the process where teachers and parents consult in advance
how these things are taught.
By working out conflicts in advance, the communication can be done freely.

So that will dispel a lot of the distrust if the process is open.
Invite full participation, talk all this out openly, and there is nothing to hide!

Maybe you and I come from different backgrounds.
In Houston I met so many parents from both the left and the right
who agreed on homeschooling, they collaborated on their own resources
for sex education, parenting etc. One group compiled a whole notebook of
resources on these, where all parents contributed from different sources.
So it is possible to work these things out if people respected instead of feared each other.
How can we teach our kids and students to work things out maturely
if parents and teachers play these games. Surely we can set a better example of
open communication, working in partnership, and respecting each other's ways
in forming agreed solutions. It's not impossible. I've seen people do it before on their own.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Blacks kill twice as many whites in raw numbers. This is also 2x5=10 times per capita the white on black crime rate. Should whites get blamed as we're currently being blamed in the media???

Black on blacks kill over 4,200 of their brothers...So consider the double standard.

Gays make up 2% of the population but expect to be treated better then anyone else. So let me ask you do you value freedom of speech or do you value the right not to feel butt hurt?

 

[emilynghiem]

Blacks kill twice as many whites in raw numbers. This is also 2x5=10 times per capita the white on black crime rate. Should whites get blamed as we're currently being blamed in the media???

Black on blacks kill over 4,200 of their brothers...So consider the double standard.

Gays make up 2% of the population but expect to be treated better then anyone else. So let me ask you do you value freedom of speech or do you value the right not to feel butt hurt?

The majority of the Constitutional laws that founded this country originated from European principles of natural laws,
with some concepts taken from Native American tribal conferences and some people also crediting Arabic or Islamic
laws not just Judeo Christian or Mosaic.

So this is where the perception comes from that European Whites have dominated how history and laws are recorded that are still predominant today.

Biases come into play if you want to spin this Eurocentric core as a positive or a negative contribution.

That's where ppl are getting this idea that racial dominance is White centered and everyone else is reacting to that predominance.

I have friends who even define racism as White centered to begin with as the privileged class.

 

[Pedro de San Patricio]

Jesus... Look, I'm not saying kids shouldn't be taught to be tolerant. I'm not saying that she's wrong for being gay. I'm just saying that she's being paid to teach her students math, not politics or how great she thinks her personal sexual orientation is. If she finds it so hard to keep her private life private and refrain from using her position as an elementary school teacher to teach her students about her desire to fuck women rather than the arithmetic she's being paid to teach them, then maybe she shouldn't have the job to begin with. I have to wonder what the parents employing her think of this.

 

[Sonny Clark]

These mentally disturbed adults are intentionally indoctrinating young children to embrace homosexuality, transgenderism and "queer" for pretty much any other sexual act not covered LGBT.

It's time these fecal-matter-lickers and rectum-plungers be put in jail. They are open about sexualizing young children. These are people that are sexually disturbed, why would you want sexually disturbed people around your children. These are abominations that prefer having a dick stuck in their ass, and then sucking their own shit off of it, instead of putting it where nature intends --- a life-producing vaginal canal.

ORONTO, April 24, 2015 -- A lesbian teacher ‘married’ to another woman revealed at a pro-gay teachers’ conference earlier this month how she teaches grade 4-5 students to accept homosexuality through what she called “social justice” math.

Alicia Gunn, an elementary public school teacher in Mississauga, Ontario, told attendees at the April 10 conference in Toronto’s City Hall that injecting LGBTQ issues into the classroom, especially in math, helps students as young as nine “disrupt the single story that many of our kids have about LGBTQ families.”

When asked by one of the workshop attendees if she first asks parents’ permission before bringing homosexual issues up in class, Gunn responded that she does not, but she makes sure to teach her students about numerous social justice issues so that no parent can accuse her of focusing on homosexuality, which she said she likes to “hide” in her lessons.

Lesbian I use math class to teach young kids about homosexuality so I can hide it from parents News LifeSite


Radical Math

This world keeps falling to new lows every single day.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Alexander the "Great" would have something to say about this.

Yes, I'm sure the conqueror who failed to leave behind sufficient heirs to inherit the majesty of his empire (kingdom?) would very much tell us that his fecal fornication with faggots very much led to the rapid demise of his legacy. If only he sired more children.

 

[LoneLaugher]

2A,

How's that appointment to the academy looking?

You've really made your feelings known about this matter. That school in Canada must be really bothering you. Your very graphic description of what you imagine is happening in those math classes reads like a nutter wish list.

 

[NYcarbineer]

They made us say the pledge of allegiance when I was in the 4th grade.

 

[zeke]

Why the fuck is 2A obsessing over something happening in Canada? Does 2A write sex novels on the side? Or does he use his graphic descriptions for a training manual? Any guesses?

 

[zeke]

They made us say the pledge of allegiance when I was in the 4th grade

Me too. But we also had to do nuclear duck and cover drills. I lived close to a SAC AFB when I was a kid.
Even in fourth grade I wondered how effective hiding under my desk was going to be. Not very was the answer.
But our teachers tried to keep us from becoming neurotic wrecks worrying about nuclear annihilation.

Ah the good ole days. When all you had to worry about was dying from the bomb. .

 

[LoneLaugher]

They made us say the pledge of allegiance when I was in the 4th grade

Me too. But we also had to do nuclear duck and cover drills. I lived close to a SAC AFB when I was a kid.
Even in fourth grade I wondered how effective hiding under my desk was going to be. Not very was the answer.
But our teachers tried to keep us from becoming neurotic wrecks worrying about nuclear annihilation.

Ah the good ole days. When all you had to worry about was dying from the bomb. .

I grew up on and very near military bases as well. We weren't hiding under desks......but we sure did recite the pledge.

 

[deltex1]

You have an extendable dildo. It is now set for a four inch anal penetration. Your partners anal cavity extends to seven and three eights inches in depth. How much must you further extend your dildo to achieve full penetration?

Isn't that what modern education calls "teaching across the curriculum"?

 

[zeke]

I grew up on and very near military bases as well. We weren't hiding under desks......but we sure did recite the pledge.

Something about how the Russians had all the SAC bases targeted made the city I lived in very conscious of the fact we could be nuked first. Bomb shelters were marked all over the city. Evacuation routes marked. It was an interesting time. I remember watching the Cuban missile crisis unfold and remember Kennedy's
talk on the TV and thinking that we were all gonna die soon.

 

[Sonny Clark]

Why the fuck is 2A obsessing over something happening in Canada? Does 2A write sex novels on the side? Or does he use his graphic descriptions for a training manual? Any guesses?

Ok, I'll take a stab at it, since you asked.
You do know that "THEY" occasionally let folks out on weekends with limited supervision, don't you? Well, it just might follow that during times of unsupervised activity, the mind acts on impulse to transcribe thoughts into words on paper ( or a forum ). These random thoughts assume their own identity, take the form of irrational philosophy, and become confusing concepts, often encouraging criticism and unfavorable critique. <<--------------- ( technical evaluation and reasoning ). Now, to put it in layman's terms, "once a loony, always a loony". Any questions?