So In The Absence of Deity: Financial Inclusion(?)!

[mascale]

The sources that say "net" include many that say "Total," or even "total," or even "Net(?)! BEA used "Total Net Debt" before the Carter Administration budget cuts, Now the noted private sector estimate uses "Total Debt," and likely with basis in Flow of Funds at Federal Reserve. A lot of accounting and technology has changed since the Carter Administration, when "Flow of Funds" existed, and was generally different from "Total Net Debt." Flow of Funds was volatile, and likely with basis in the link below.

Then anyone sees that Toddsterpatriot used "net," instead of "Net(?)," and can say, "So What!" Anyone sees how spurious--anything from Toddsterpatriot posted--itself anywhere should be regarded! In the matter of "Total Debt" versus "Total Net Debt," then "So What?!" can be asked. A reference is to Bureau of Economic Analysis uses, from decades ago. Flow of Funds may or may not include extra stuff, from what was happening decades ago--especially since there is not more to report!

Then from the allusion to the "Total Net Debt," from BEA era: Billions can ask,"Why not a Total Net Debt" estimate anymore? Rarely does it seem to be used, possibly with regard and respect for the former use.

Net Total Vs. Gross Total

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations now even represented independently in Congress, after many decades!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The sources that say "net" include many that say "Total," or even "total," or even "Net(?)! BEA used "Total Net Debt" before the Carter Administration budget cuts, Now the noted private sector estimate uses "Total Debt," and likely with basis in Flow of Funds at Federal Reserve. A lot of accounting and technology has changed since the Carter Administration, when "Flow of Funds" existed, and was generally different from "Total Net Debt." Flow of Funds was volatile, and likely with basis in the link below.

Then anyone sees that Toddsterpatriot used "net," instead of "Net(?)," and can say, "So What!" Anyone sees how spurious--anything from Toddsterpatriot posted--itself anywhere should be regarded! In the matter of "Total Debt" versus "Total Net Debt," then "So What?!" can be asked. A reference is to Bureau of Economic Analysis uses, from decades ago. Flow of Funds may or may not include extra stuff, from what was happening decades ago--especially since there is not more to report!

Then from the allusion to the "Total Net Debt," from BEA era: Billions can ask,"Why not a Total Net Debt" estimate anymore? Rarely does it seem to be used, possibly with regard and respect for the former use.

Net Total Vs. Gross Total

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations now even represented independently in Congress, after many decades!)

The sources that say "net" include many that say "Total," or even "total,"

Which of your sources said net debt?

BEA used "Total Net Debt" before the Carter Administration budget cuts,

Post a link.

Look, my point is, what nets out your debt? If you owe $100,000 on your mortgage, and that's it, your total debt is $100,000. If you have $10,000 in your checking account and $10,000 in a money market, will you net that against your debt? Is your "net debt" $80,000? Or is your total debt still $100,000?

 

[mascale]

Ignorance and sloth are now signature Toddsterpatriot posts. There are libraries with records from the Carter Administration, and before. There is link already posted about net total and gross total computing. Then there are sources all over regarding federal computing, Consumer Price Index or lots of any others(?).

The OP had a debt figure and the source has been noted. The Federal Reserve Board is well-known world-wide, with anything anyone wants to know.

The OP is actually about how purveyors of the crime-books of Moses, the exiled subjugating heinous-monster out of Egypt--(a Prince of the Realm): Created murder, in economic reasoning, fictitious deity-directed(?). The existence of the Deut 23:19-20 Atrocity is elsewhere corroborated. Some regard it the origin of 20th Century Holocaust.

Then anyone notices how widespread that became. Every teacher worldwide has failed at usury explanation, with the recent foreclosure crisis an outcome. An explanation is shown in Post-Alexander-The-Great Middle East: New Testament 25:14-30, a remedy found in New Testament 20:1-16. Anything post-Four Gospels about the two stories is nowhere shown--regarding the specific mythology of the mythology(?). Mohammed, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Keynes, Galbraith, or Milton Friedman are only a part of the included.

Then there are the Heinous Foaling Families: Doing that to all their babies even outside of a Holocaust, and so at any rate.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Clearly: Teaching and publication are not possible, without the doctoral degree--unless it is believed that some kids are better than other kids, and that all the other kids are not worth the extra effort!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ignorance and sloth are now signature Toddsterpatriot posts. There are libraries with records from the Carter Administration, and before. There is link already posted about net total and gross total computing. Then there are sources all over regarding federal computing, Consumer Price Index or lots of any others(?).

The OP had a debt figure and the source has been noted. The Federal Reserve Board is well-known world-wide, with anything anyone wants to know.

The OP is actually about how purveyors of the crime-books of Moses, the exiled subjugating heinous-monster out of Egypt--(a Prince of the Realm): Created murder, in economic reasoning, fictitious deity-directed(?). The existence of the Deut 23:19-20 Atrocity is elsewhere corroborated. Some regard it the origin of 20th Century Holocaust.

Then anyone notices how widespread that became. Every teacher worldwide has failed at usury explanation, with the recent foreclosure crisis an outcome. An explanation is shown in Post-Alexander-The-Great Middle East: New Testament 25:14-30, a remedy found in New Testament 20:1-16. Anything post-Four Gospels about the two stories is nowhere shown--regarding the specific mythology of the mythology(?). Mohammed, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Keynes, Galbraith, or Milton Friedman are only a part of the included.

Then there are the Heinous Foaling Families: Doing that to all their babies even outside of a Holocaust, and so at any rate.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Clearly: Teaching and publication are not possible, without the doctoral degree--unless it is believed that some kids are better than other kids, and that all the other kids are not worth the extra effort!)

Lots of gibberish, no source that says net.

 

[mascale]

In the Toddsterpatriot brand, lots of gibberish is also history(?)! No links can be shown to any original videos of virtually everything(?)! Way below is a source that says net debt, though: Linked. Many would say that Toddsterpatriot is of that brand, that many have heard of: That even burn the books in the streets! Toddsterpatriot has posted that no source that says net is shown. In that context is shown the Toddsterpatriot brand. Even libraries are not construed source material--from which a chain of subsequent reports can reference the concept, "Total Net Debt," That concept even originates from the Carter Administration. That was BEA, and that got changed in some budget cuts(?). Even that is not at all relevant to the OP at all. Anyone knows that there are federal sources, in the same context amounts.

And so the poetic license "Total Net Debt" usage, with modern corroboration: Is shown. Accountants and analysts will likely take it mega-steps forward, in any specific treatise of the subject. There can even be discussions of the evolution of "Total Net Debt" since 1916. Saying that even 1916 was not directly referenced in the OP is not material, nor is the absence--in the context--of a definitive "Total Net Debt" interpretation relevant. A Corroboration has been shown, widely more compelling.

It would in fact be incumbent on Toddsterpatriot: To show a definitive alternative interpretation, or 'Zero Net Debt," to bolster any critique allegedly made. There is no "Total Net Debt," at BEA? Than anyone can write to Congress. Total Net Debt Exists: Everywhere.

Except that the brand Toddsterpatriot is from: Clearly go to Torchlights instead! That is history of the last century, and recently USA. The source of "Total Net Debt," has just been shown again--and applicable. Communication beyond one US Message Board thread can happen, easily referenced.

Net Debt

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Clearly: Teaching and publication are not possible, without the doctoral degree--unless it is believed that some kids are better than other kids, and that all the other kids are not worth the extra effort!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Lots of gibberish, no source that says net.

 

[boedicca]

US Federal Reserve estimates Total Net Debt to be about $80.0 tril.: About the number of deities alleged in all of history--not that pre-humans of any type knew anything about that. The Hebrew calendar only goes back 6000 to 7000 years. Everyone else clocks in about 4.0 bil. years. Humans had come out of the primordial rain forest only about 5000 years ago: Even creating farming, and all by themselves.

Humans could eat, get fat, large, and dominating of one another. An exiled Egyptian Prince would be able to actually help write down a lot stories about what happened next. One thing happening was counting. Primitives of the last century, finally discovered, understood one, two, and many. Conquering and subjugating Egypt was far more advanced than that. It could not only count, but create, and construct. It could count its own peoples, and other peoples: And learn to kill them, enslave them, and create additional time-off for other inventions.

One thing new was usury. Just numbers themselves could be manipulated. One thing plus one thing could be two things. One woman could multiply even more things. Two women could multiply even more things. And so numbers were able to be multiplied. And then counting could be assigned, even to things that mattered. Mail toiler had five plow sticks, and could trade one for other stuff. By the By, numbers could be assigned so that some had way more, and could exchange them for even labor, materials, food, clothing, animals, and anything else.

Then others had less. One number applied to all the others could create very rich people, and people with less to exchange. The market place arose, able to support the more greatly numbered. They could use the numbers to subjugate the lesser numbers: Early labor.

So Moses came up with Deut. 23:19-20. Primitive Israel would not do usury arithmetic like that amongst one another. Everyone else they could set to subjugation with joyful abandon. The one peoples could be a nation just doing math to everyone else. At least one king could see himself blessed with so many numbers as to be able to take on many of the women multipliers, and make them--whatever happened in history.

Other nations were also able to subjugate their own peoples--laboring slaves and educated democracy participants, most famously arose. So one or more carpenters could notice that numbers on one side of a board rectangle could apply to a diagonal from the lower left to the upper right. Little lines could be drawn from the left side to the diagonal: And just like usury. Then a line could be drawn down the middle, parallel to the left side. Up at the top, there were more little lines in some of the space. At the bottom there were no lines at all in the space. So if people at those levels on the board went to a market--they were worthless. The marketplace needed that gap filled.

So Alexander the Great would start to spread concepts like that around--not entirely consciously or deliberately.

New Testament Matthew 25: 14-30 would show the usury outcome--the Foreclosure Crisis of of 2008, 2009. New Testament Matthew 20:1-16 would remedy the problem of the missing lines at the lower levels. Everyone could go to market with something, plus some newly earned--and regardless if they had worked all the (year) or not: Like the Obama refundable, equal-amount refundable: Make Work Pay Income Tax Credit.

That's a fast-forward. "Good Without A God" was not applied.

And certainly not by New Testament, subject the Gospels. Certainly not Mohammed, who would only condemn wealth from usury. Certainly not Adam Smith, appreciative of accumulation and sloth. Certain not Karl Marx, who would backtrack to "Kill everyone in sight:" No new numbering method applied. Keynes would pick up on the numbers, but not the remedy method, only the usury method. John Kenneth Galbraith would also leave that out of any explanations. Milton Friedman, and any remaining followers, would offer no such remedy.

US President Nixon had created a reliance on usury-based wage and price guidelines. Senator George McGovern had proposed and equal amount, national remedy--at last. President Ford would launch equal amount tax rebates. Congress would create the per child equal amount tax credit, advertised directly as a remedy for the heinous and usury based: Regressive payroll tax. Later on, in 1986: Then Congress would raise and index the standard deduction and personal exemptions in the tax code. By the time of the Bush Presidency, after the first one: So many people were off the tax rolls that tax cuts offered no stimulus at all to the economy.

And famously now: There are giant federal deficits, and fears of a global recession.

There is no deity about it.

A description would appear in the Free Venice Beach, mid-1980's, an underground paper, famous author, Ken Kesey had been a founder.

Only last year, Nigeria could create "Traders Moni," as first-time-ever-in history equal amounts of credit for 2.0 mil. micro-businesses. When the credit is repaid, then a new limit is created, equally, at a higher amount. It can be called credit, but not wealth from Riba: Nigeria being Commonwealth, but also nearly half Moslem.

So Look Ma! No Deity!

Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes soar like Great Crow of Liberation(?)!)

None of that adds up to 80 Trillion Dieties in all of history.

Just sayin'.

 

[mascale]

That too could be off a little, like the allusion to the $80.0 tril. Total Net Debt. Total Net Debt, however, does allude to an ancient US federal source, applied at US BEA and US Census, too.

When it comes to the deities, clearly, anyone can conclude that people have nothing to discuss: Except in the context of fantasies of history. More succinctly, people likely know about their total net debt, in contrast.

Moody's, for example, understands perfectly the concept, "Total Net Debt," and "Downgrade."
Economic inequality could cause U.S. debt downgrade, Moody’s says

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many can recall that US may not honor its debt notes, when S&P did the downgrade!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Federal "net debt" is about $16.6 trillion.

 

[mascale]

Matter is nearly shown. There is a Federal "Ne Debt," computing. IIt is Independent of Flow of Funds and Total Net Debt Computing, which goes further and includes state and local government debt, business, household, and consumer debt, and any others.

"Crow, James Crow Shaken, Not Stirred!
(So anyone sees what Liberal Democratic political office candidates are for! (Not financial inclusion!)! Anyone asks if a Deity at all exists, and then asks did the deity express or ever remedy Duet: 23:19-23. Nazi's actually knew the answer, and then went forward with the deity blessings, recorded in history . . . .if any(?)!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Matter is nearly shown. There is a Federal "Ne Debt," computing. IIt is Independent of Flow of Funds and Total Net Debt Computing, which goes further and includes state and local government debt, business, household, and consumer debt, and any others.

"Crow, James Crow Shaken, Not Stirred!
(So anyone sees what Liberal Democratic political office candidates are for! (Nof Financial Inclusion!)

FRB: Z.1 Release - Financial Accounts of the United States - Current Release

Here?

FRB: Search Results

Or here?

Federal Reserve Board - Home

Maybe here?

 

[mascale]

Or Maybe here--to the end of the Carter Administration.

Net Public and Private Debt
DATE: 1975

PART OF:

• Historical Statistics of the United States : Volume 2 : Colonial Times to 1970

AUTHOR:

• United States. Bureau of the Census

Then there are the "Torchlight-History" deniers, and the multitudes of analysts able to discern meaning, worldwide.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Many marks on paper send Lands of Many Nations to rotted corn and poison blankets, during that time frame: and Even a Civil War! Many shown to chant of fire: "You will not replace us!" )

 

[mascale]

Analysts and others do know the concept(s). Then anyone goes to anyone of them to find what they mean and use.

The Difference Between Public and Private Debt - Fleximize

Mostly, they have never heard of Deuteronomy 23:19-20, Matthew 25:14-30, or Matthew 20:1-16. Probably they would regard it all as being "Greek" to them: Regardless of any translations(?)! Anyone can infer that from just reading newspapers, even online.

Then there are the various public statute books, and the other sources all shown, too! Bureau of the Census likely has someone who knows(?). Some things they know. Some things they do not: Clearly, enough(?).


"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes do Fiery Chant of war: "YOU! will not. . . .replace us!" and with lethal level tenacity(?)!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Or Maybe here--to the end of the Carter Administration.

Net Public and Private Debt
DATE: 1975

PART OF:

• Historical Statistics of the United States : Volume 2 : Colonial Times to 1970

AUTHOR:

• United States. Bureau of the Census

Then there are the "Torchlight-History" deniers, and the multitudes of analysts able to discern meaning, worldwide.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Many marks on paper send Lands of Many Nations to rotted corn and poison blankets, during that time frame: and Even a Civil War! Many shown to chant of fire: "You will not replace us!" )

Thanks for the link...here's what I saw.

1 Net Federal debt (public and agency) is the outstanding debt held by the public as shown in The Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 1974 U3

I already posted debt held by the public.

Debt to the Penny (Daily History Search Application)

Less than $16.6 trillion. Not $80 trillion.

If you meant private "net debt", you need a different source.

 

[mascale]

Total Public Debt is about what is widely reported, a portion of the Total, except that state and local debt is not included, nor the debts of their public organizations. Then anyone knows that businesses and corporations have bonds and lines of credit. People have mortgages, credit cards and lines, car loans and of course: Bookie Accounts(?), and who keeps the records(?)!

Anyone sees in post #34 above why why Torchlight Supremacist, Toddsterpatriot, is way beneath being regarded any kind of analyst, or even English-speaking(?). The reference of the computing, going back before the Carter Administration, is analysis--English-speaking,

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Maybe a good day to throw-in-towel(?)!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Total Public Debt is about what is widely reported, a portion of the Total.

Anyone sees in post #34 above why why Torchlight Supremacist, Toddsterpatriot, is way beneath being regarded any kind of analyst, or even English-speaking(?). The reference of the computing, going back before the Carter Administration, is analysis--English-speaking,

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Maybe a good day to throw-in-towel(?)!)

When you're done with the gibberish (LOL!) any source for your $80 trillion would be awesome!!

 

[Agit8r]

Our government has gotten so bloated and feeble, it might accidentally drown itself in a bathtub.

 

[mascale]

Many analysts go to the Fed, but that it is already outdated, from last year. So the source of the approaching $80.00 tril. debt total is in a different post. An example of how The Fed shows it is below. The claim of the immature, torchlight supremacist poster, Toddsterpatriot, is the claim in post 34 above that $72.0 tril., or $80.0 tril., is actually $23.0 tril. Anyone can see how that is English-challenged, and even not too smart(?).

To see how that is done is blatant: ". . .except that state and local debt is not included, nor the debts of their public organizations. Then anyone knows that businesses and corporations have bonds and lines of credit. People have mortgages, credit cards and lines, car loans and of course: Bookie Accounts(?), and who keeps the records(?)!"

It is even immaterial to the basis problem of arithmetic widely ignored for 3500 years or more.



All sectors; debt securities and loans; liability, Level

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Credit maybe not valuable! Real smart people know value found in rocks!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Many analysts go to the Fed, but that it is already outdated, from last year. So the source of the approaching $80.00 tril. debt total is in a different post. An example of how The Fed shows it is below. The claim of the immature, torchlight supremacist poster, Toddsterpatriot, is the claim in post 34 above that $72.0 tril., or $80.0 tril., is actually $23.0 tril. Anyone can see how that is English-challenged, and even not too smart(?).

To see how that is done is blatant: ". . .except that state and local debt is not included, nor the debts of their public organizations. Then anyone knows that businesses and corporations have bonds and lines of credit. People have mortgages, credit cards and lines, car loans and of course: Bookie Accounts(?), and who keeps the records(?)!"

It is even immaterial to the basis problem of arithmetic widely ignored for 3500 years or more.



All sectors; debt securities and loans; liability, Level

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Credit maybe not valuable! Real smart people know value found in rocks!)

And household net worth is about $109 trillion.

Are you seeing a specialist?

 

[mascale]

Torchlight Supremacist, Toddsterpatriot's, love of inflation is posted now posted in #39 above. US household net worth is ratcheting up among the hyper-usury profiteering, but data tends to stop about 2017, closer to about two thirds of $109 tril. It is but climbing--but mostly among the super-rich.

Then anyone knows that debt is an obligation whereas asset values are a valuation--mostly of analysts.

The social, economic, analytical, and probably--emotional immaturity--of Torchlight Supremacist, Toddsterpatriot,
is all that is posted in #39 above.

It is also irrelevant to the OP.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred:
(Analysts of Many Nations valued Manhattan at $25.00, a long, long time ago(?)! From that likely all Manhattan will pay everyone the $80.0 tril.(?)! Problem in late 2017--The average sales price in Manhattan fell below $2 million for the first time in nearly two years--way overvalued even then(?)!)