Then why not wait until the "weeping, wailing, moaning and gnashing of teeth" actually occurs and then bash each fact as you see fit.
You accuse one side of spinning the facts, but you are pre-emptively spinning before the "facts" even happen.
It already started happening Sherlock. The diminishing, the saying that "It's Bush's policies that did it", the reluctance to believe Osama's dead until they "see proof." All of this is coming from The Right, FOX, RW hate-radio, et al.
It ain't coming from the Left.
Why must you be so intellectually dishonest?
Yeah, you've missed or sidestepped the point. Surprise.
I have no ax to grind about the dishonesty of one side vs another. I never said it wasn't coming. I don't doubt for a second that some sections of the right will attempt to pull the rug from under Obama on this. As you yourself said, it's campaigning season and so the gloves are off (fucking stupid observation if you ask me - as if campaign season somehow made it OK for one side to lie about the other).
What I said was that it would be more sensible for you to have specific quotes and take issue with them on an individual basis as they happen, rather than just making a sweeping comment about what you believe is going to happen.
You're confusing my criticism of your posting style with supposed tacit support for one agenda. That's not intellectual dishonesty. It's perfectly straightforward, unless of course you are predisposed to think that criticism of you must therefore somehow imply criticism of Obama.
But since you've missed that one, I'll try and make it still clearer. Obama made the correct decision here. He deserves credit for it, and the right should give him that credit. If they don't they are being hypocritical.
All of which has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on my criticism of your OP, which was a set of predictions from you, written entirely in the future tense. Now you go on to say "it's already happening, Sherlock", and give a few broad paraphrased examples, as if I had somehow denied that fact when all I had done was asked you to be critical of specifics. Now THAT REALLY IS intellectual dishonesty.