Snopes Got 'Snoped' On Two Lies

[GaryDog]

Facts have a liberal bias.

Damned book-learnin' liberals!!!

 

[TooTall]

Pretty weak evidence. The right has gotten tired of getting caught with their pants down. Here's a clue: Quit reading Breitbart et al. and you won't have to keep putting out these whines.

Why don’t we just state the obvious? You don’t give a shit if they lie or not. You do not care how dishonest the left is because you are a diehard lefty no matter what. So I guess you are not his audience.

Doo Doo Economics Blog: Fact Checkers at Snopes Cover-Up Scytl Scandal

FACT CHECKING THE FACT CHECKERS

Politifact.com is so biased that it has spawned Facebook pages, blogs, twitter accounts and even aWorse Politifact Lie of the Year Award to track all of the misinformation. EvenPolitifact.com brother-in-left-wing-bias-arms Wikipedia.com takes note of the bias.

Wikipedia.com is edited by an army of paid left-wing operatives and ignorant kids who reference bad sources. It is useful for very basic information and links to vocabulary definitions. It is also useful to see the progressive revision of historical events. Lets move on...

Snopes.com is the big daddy of politically biased propaganda and misinformation. David and Barbara Mikkelson are the owners of Snopes and do much of their own research from their home in the San Fernando Valley. Researching into Snopes bias has revealed problems with how they handled many issues. However, financial contributions to Barack Obama were not uncovered nor was private financing from George Soros. It may be that the Mikkelson family has an natural left-wing bias and do not require or report compensation.

One reason that you should not trust snopes.com is that the site disables users ability to cut and paste text from the webpage. Users cannot take text and check it against other sources via a search engine like Google.com. Maybe the Mikkelsons were worried about intellectual property rights as they generate their own research content. However, they gather most of their information from available online resources.

FactCheck.org is run by Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. FactCheck.org Director, Brooks Jackson is widely touted as fair and unbiased. In reality, the site is run with a personal agenda. One of the worst examples surrounds Brooks Jackson's treatment of the Obama Birth Certificate. He repeatedly misrepresented the badly forged Certification of Live Birth as a Birth Certificate (more information). Additionally, The National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action says: “FactCheck cherry-picks “facts” to suit its anti-NRA, anti-gun, anti-self-defense agenda—an agenda that the American people do not share.”

FactCheck.org changed how it financed its operations in 2010. Their About Us page now includes some revealing information about staff and finances. Donations from the left-leaning Pew Charitable Trusts, Carnegie Corporation of New York and Obama donors from the Flora Family Foundation. Regardless, FactCheck.org is superior to Snopes, Politifact or Wikipedia.


How many links you want exposing Snopes? 10? 20? 50?

SNOPES LIES TO PROTECT OBAMA - Tampa Tea Party Members ...
www.meetup.com/Tampa-Tea-Party/messages/21472441/
Aug 18, 2011 - Here's a fun little fact about the Internet – it is almost impossible to completely “scrub”, i.e. remove, something from the web. It is after all a ...

Snopes Lies | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/Snopes-Lies-221236624664088/
Snopes Lies, Portland, Oregon. 3189 likes · 92 talking about this. This site is to help expose the misinformation snopes.com feeds the american public.

Snopes Scrubs Article On Obama's Mama's Picture-Porn: Excluded ...
www.obamareleaseyourrecords.com/.../snopes-scrubs-article-on-obamas-mamas.html
Jun 16, 2012 - This isn't the first time Snopes went out of its way to protect Obama and his family lies. Take a look at what they published about Obama's social ...

Snopes Lies – Untrustworthy Leftist Propaganda |
www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/snopes-lies-untrustworthy-leftist-propaganda/
Snopes Lies – Untrustworthy Leftist Propaganda. Posted on January 25, 2016 by Anonymous Conservative · I loved this link: Example: [Collected via e-mail, ...

I just love the references you used to back your claims. No Biased there!!! (You actually couldn't get more biased.)

Who do you want me to go to to expose the bullshit? Shall we ask ABC or CNN to run a story on Snopes? How about the NY Times? How about PBS?

You see the problem with people like you is that you are so devoted to liberal anything you are incapable of ever admitting to the truth when it convicts your heroes. And that goes for all your media outlets too. They cover up every scandal or bad press as much as they can to protect their lefties. (Haven't noticed that have you Einstein?)

So where am I to find a story exposing Snopes and its leftist agenda?

Never mind. You are beyond redemption.

It’s Snopes vs. Politifact! The vile bias of the left wing media in an ugly display

The Indisputable Liberal Bias of Snopes - Stormfront

examples of snopes bias, Search.com

Actually, I'm more moderate than liberal but then I would guess with your mentality, you think everyone who is to the left of you, is a liberal.
Anyway, I clearly remember all the threads that popped up here after that liberal machine known as PolitiFact, gave Obama "The Lie of the Year" in 2014. It was hard rightwing orgasm after orgasm. I hadn't seen so many orgasms since I saw a bukkake porn flick!
None
But when PolitiFact gave your hero and savior the 2015 " Lies of the Year", you on the hard right went bonkers, all of a sudden PolitiFact was a far left rag!
2015 Lie of the Year: Donald Trump's campaign misstatements
You guys just kill me!

Some people know the difference between a bald faced lie that affects their pocketbook and a campaign misstatement that cost you nothing. And then there are LWNJ'S that don't know much.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Snopes must be doing their job well to generate this level of reaction.

Yeah, like they are covering for Hillary so constantly that they are doing 'their job' well enough to outrage people disgusted with Snopes pretense of being objective and impartial.

 

[turzovka]

Facts have a liberal bias.

Damned book-learnin' liberals!!!

Stupid people are naive. Or naive people are stupid. Choose.

If you think a news outlet or a fact finding outlet cannot be biased because they only reveal facts, you need an education. More often than not, it is not what facts you report that slants a story, it is what facts they choose not to report. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Facts have a liberal bias.

Damned book-learnin' liberals!!!

Yeah facts like Hillary is a criminal, Obama is a communist and the Democratic Party rigs elections

 

[Conservative65]

Pretty weak evidence. The right has gotten tired of getting caught with their pants down. Here's a clue: Quit reading Breitbart et al. and you won't have to keep putting out these whines.

Oh, the information is wrong because you don't like the source argument? Seems those like you that discount facts because you don't like where the facts were presented are the whiners. "I don't agree with the facts and not liking the source is proof that the facts aren't true".

 

[GaryDog]

Facts have a liberal bias.

Damned book-learnin' liberals!!!

Stupid people are naive. Or naive people are stupid. Choose.

If you think a news outlet or a fact finding outlet cannot be biased because they only reveal facts, you need an education. More often than not, it is not what facts you report that slants a story, it is what facts they choose not to report. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

So what are they refusing to report when politifact says Obama lied?

You're a whiny partisan shill. Shut up.

 

[turzovka]

Facts have a liberal bias.

Damned book-learnin' liberals!!!

Stupid people are naive. Or naive people are stupid. Choose.

If you think a news outlet or a fact finding outlet cannot be biased because they only reveal facts, you need an education. More often than not, it is not what facts you report that slants a story, it is what facts they choose not to report. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

So what are they refusing to report when politifact says Obama lied?

You're a whiny partisan shill. Shut up.

I will shut up. Because you have clearly demonstrated you are not capable of listening and understanding. You are exasperating.

 

[GaryDog]

Facts have a liberal bias.

Damned book-learnin' liberals!!!

Stupid people are naive. Or naive people are stupid. Choose.

If you think a news outlet or a fact finding outlet cannot be biased because they only reveal facts, you need an education. More often than not, it is not what facts you report that slants a story, it is what facts they choose not to report. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

So what are they refusing to report when politifact says Obama lied?

You're a whiny partisan shill. Shut up.

I will shut up. Because you have clearly demonstrated you are not capable of listening and understanding. You are exasperating.

That was all you needed to say.

 

[turzovka]

Facts have a liberal bias.

Damned book-learnin' liberals!!!

Stupid people are naive. Or naive people are stupid. Choose.

If you think a news outlet or a fact finding outlet cannot be biased because they only reveal facts, you need an education. More often than not, it is not what facts you report that slants a story, it is what facts they choose not to report. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

So what are they refusing to report when politifact says Obama lied?

You're a whiny partisan shill. Shut up.

I will shut up. Because you have clearly demonstrated you are not capable of listening and understanding. You are exasperating.

That was all you needed to say.

Here is some unsolicited advice.

Try separating yourself from all of the other stepford wife liberal robots around here. You are living a lie and, at a minimum, bore us with your rhetoric.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Facts have a liberal bias.

Damned book-learnin' liberals!!!

Stupid people are naive. Or naive people are stupid. Choose.

If you think a news outlet or a fact finding outlet cannot be biased because they only reveal facts, you need an education. More often than not, it is not what facts you report that slants a story, it is what facts they choose not to report. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

So what are they refusing to report when politifact says Obama lied?

You're a whiny partisan shill. Shut up.

I will shut up. Because you have clearly demonstrated you are not capable of listening and understanding. You are exasperating.

That was all you needed to say.

You had to post that?

Damn, you libtards are so given to being fonts of verbiage it is surprising that you ever find sleep

 

[konradv]

Pretty weak evidence. The right has gotten tired of getting caught with their pants down. Here's a clue: Quit reading Breitbart et al. and you won't have to keep putting out these whines.

Oh, the information is wrong because you don't like the source argument? Seems those like you that discount facts because you don't like where the facts were presented are the whiners. "I don't agree with the facts and not liking the source is proof that the facts aren't true".

Isn't that what we get every time snopes is cited? When does Breitbart debunk Obama stories, like snopes does with conservative figures?

 

[westwall]

Pretty weak evidence. The right has gotten tired of getting caught with their pants down. Here's a clue: Quit reading Breitbart et al. and you won't have to keep putting out these whines.

Yes, in political matters Snopes provides exceptionally weak evidence to support its statements.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

I noticed long ago that there is no left wing conspiracy that Snopes won't quell; whereas, they'll drop the hammer if it's against someone on the right. It's BS.