Since percents and per capita are NOT valid?

[RetiredGySgt]

249

Do you understand what per capita statistics are?

Here is an example for ya! tell me what you think:

IN 2016 Non Hispanic Whites were 61.3% of a population of
323,127,513 which comes out to 198, 077,165.

In 2016 there were 42, 249 opioid deaths. 33450 (79.1%) were non Hispanic Whites and 437 4 (10%) non Hispanic Black opioid deaths. For whites thats 0 .00017 deaths per capita and the per capita for Blacks is 0.00010 deaths.
per capita.

Since non Hispanic Whites are only 61% of the general population but 79% of opioid deaths. occurred in their communities; their distribution rate is 17 per 1000 and the Black opioid death rate is 10 per 1000

The 2016 Census puts the Black population at 42 million or 13.3% of the general population but had only 10% of the opioid deaths. That makes their opioid death rate 4374/ 42000000 =0.00010 X 1000 or 10 per 1000

* per capita

So whites consume more of one particular drug.

And? Who gives a shit what their drug of choice is? If the worst thing about blacks was that they quietly killed themselves out of sight, I doubt too many people would have a problem with them.

Now what is the Black murder rate per capita. Apparently you dumbasses don't know because none of your math shows per capita. In 2016 there were 4935 Blacks arrested for murder out of a population of 42 million. SO... to find per capita
4935/42000000 = 0.0001175, a number so small it is almost meaningless ini terms of per capita. Yet you dumb MFs keep mistaking rate per 1000 as per capita when it isn't.

That's the thing, it's not just murder, it's other much more common violent crimes as well. The murder rate is just an indicator of their violence. It's not a few really bad black apples with the rest of blacks being equal to whites. They all tend to be worse, with some exceptions.

This doesn't seem to be the case in the real world.

2013 Robbery arrests
Whites: 32,945
Shitskins: 44,271
Table 43

2016 Arrests for all crimes

Whites 5,858,330
Blacks 2,263,112

What you say doesn't exist in the real world.

Retard alert only 13 percent of the population is black yet almost 30 percent of all criminals arrested were black.

 

[IM2]

249 Here is an example for ya! tell me what you think:

IN 2016 Non Hispanic Whites were 61.3% of a population of
323,127,513 which comes out to 198, 077,165.

In 2016 there were 42, 249 opioid deaths. 33450 (79.1%) were non Hispanic Whites and 437 4 (10%) non Hispanic Black opioid deaths. For whites thats 0 .00017 deaths per capita and the per capita for Blacks is 0.00010 deaths.
per capita.

Since non Hispanic Whites are only 61% of the general population but 79% of opioid deaths. occurred in their communities; their distribution rate is 17 per 1000 and the Black opioid death rate is 10 per 1000

The 2016 Census puts the Black population at 42 million or 13.3% of the general population but had only 10% of the opioid deaths. That makes their opioid death rate 4374/ 42000000 =0.00010 X 1000 or 10 per 1000

* per capita

So whites consume more of one particular drug.

And? Who gives a shit what their drug of choice is? If the worst thing about blacks was that they quietly killed themselves out of sight, I doubt too many people would have a problem with them.

Now what is the Black murder rate per capita. Apparently you dumbasses don't know because none of your math shows per capita. In 2016 there were 4935 Blacks arrested for murder out of a population of 42 million. SO... to find per capita
4935/42000000 = 0.0001175, a number so small it is almost meaningless ini terms of per capita. Yet you dumb MFs keep mistaking rate per 1000 as per capita when it isn't.

That's the thing, it's not just murder, it's other much more common violent crimes as well. The murder rate is just an indicator of their violence. It's not a few really bad black apples with the rest of blacks being equal to whites. They all tend to be worse, with some exceptions.

This doesn't seem to be the case in the real world.

2013 Robbery arrests
Whites: 32,945
Shitskins: 44,271
Table 43

2016 Arrests for all crimes

Whites 5,858,330
Blacks 2,263,112

What you say doesn't exist in the real world.

Retard alert only 13 percent of the population is black yet almost 30 percent of all criminals arrested were black.

Out of the 100 percent of the American population who are criminals, 70 percent are white.

 

[bgrouse]

249

Do you understand what per capita statistics are?

Here is an example for ya! tell me what you think:

IN 2016 Non Hispanic Whites were 61.3% of a population of
323,127,513 which comes out to 198, 077,165.

In 2016 there were 42, 249 opioid deaths. 33450 (79.1%) were non Hispanic Whites and 437 4 (10%) non Hispanic Black opioid deaths. For whites thats 0 .00017 deaths per capita and the per capita for Blacks is 0.00010 deaths.
per capita.

Since non Hispanic Whites are only 61% of the general population but 79% of opioid deaths. occurred in their communities; their distribution rate is 17 per 1000 and the Black opioid death rate is 10 per 1000

The 2016 Census puts the Black population at 42 million or 13.3% of the general population but had only 10% of the opioid deaths. That makes their opioid death rate 4374/ 42000000 =0.00010 X 1000 or 10 per 1000

* per capita

So whites consume more of one particular drug.

And? Who gives a shit what their drug of choice is? If the worst thing about blacks was that they quietly killed themselves out of sight, I doubt too many people would have a problem with them.

Now what is the Black murder rate per capita. Apparently you dumbasses don't know because none of your math shows per capita. In 2016 there were 4935 Blacks arrested for murder out of a population of 42 million. SO... to find per capita
4935/42000000 = 0.0001175, a number so small it is almost meaningless ini terms of per capita. Yet you dumb MFs keep mistaking rate per 1000 as per capita when it isn't.

That's the thing, it's not just murder, it's other much more common violent crimes as well. The murder rate is just an indicator of their violence. It's not a few really bad black apples with the rest of blacks being equal to whites. They all tend to be worse, with some exceptions.

This doesn't seem to be the case in the real world.

2013 Robbery arrests
Whites: 32,945
Shitskins: 44,271
Table 43

2016 Arrests for all crimes

Whites 5,858,330
Blacks 2,263,112

What you say doesn't exist in the real world.

2.5 times the arrests for 5.7 times the population means you shitskins are arrested at a higher rate, stupid.

 

[bgrouse]

So whites consume more of one particular drug.

And? Who gives a shit what their drug of choice is? If the worst thing about blacks was that they quietly killed themselves out of sight, I doubt too many people would have a problem with them.That's the thing, it's not just murder, it's other much more common violent crimes as well. The murder rate is just an indicator of their violence. It's not a few really bad black apples with the rest of blacks being equal to whites. They all tend to be worse, with some exceptions.

This doesn't seem to be the case in the real world.

2013 Robbery arrests
Whites: 32,945
Shitskins: 44,271
Table 43

2016 Arrests for all crimes

Whites 5,858,330
Blacks 2,263,112

What you say doesn't exist in the real world.

Retard alert only 13 percent of the population is black yet almost 30 percent of all criminals arrested were black.

Out of the 100 percent of the American population who are criminals, 70 percent are white.

...which would make sense, since whites are about 72% of the population. Meanwhile, shitskins are about 13% of the population and the same chart shows them to be at 27% of offenders! Throw in the fact that shitskins are even more overrepresented in stupid violent crime categories like robbery and murder and you turds are even worse.

 

[IM2]

249 Here is an example for ya! tell me what you think:

IN 2016 Non Hispanic Whites were 61.3% of a population of
323,127,513 which comes out to 198, 077,165.

In 2016 there were 42, 249 opioid deaths. 33450 (79.1%) were non Hispanic Whites and 437 4 (10%) non Hispanic Black opioid deaths. For whites thats 0 .00017 deaths per capita and the per capita for Blacks is 0.00010 deaths.
per capita.

Since non Hispanic Whites are only 61% of the general population but 79% of opioid deaths. occurred in their communities; their distribution rate is 17 per 1000 and the Black opioid death rate is 10 per 1000

The 2016 Census puts the Black population at 42 million or 13.3% of the general population but had only 10% of the opioid deaths. That makes their opioid death rate 4374/ 42000000 =0.00010 X 1000 or 10 per 1000

* per capita

So whites consume more of one particular drug.

And? Who gives a shit what their drug of choice is? If the worst thing about blacks was that they quietly killed themselves out of sight, I doubt too many people would have a problem with them.

Now what is the Black murder rate per capita. Apparently you dumbasses don't know because none of your math shows per capita. In 2016 there were 4935 Blacks arrested for murder out of a population of 42 million. SO... to find per capita
4935/42000000 = 0.0001175, a number so small it is almost meaningless ini terms of per capita. Yet you dumb MFs keep mistaking rate per 1000 as per capita when it isn't.

That's the thing, it's not just murder, it's other much more common violent crimes as well. The murder rate is just an indicator of their violence. It's not a few really bad black apples with the rest of blacks being equal to whites. They all tend to be worse, with some exceptions.

This doesn't seem to be the case in the real world.

2013 Robbery arrests
Whites: 32,945
Shitskins: 44,271
Table 43

2016 Arrests for all crimes

Whites 5,858,330
Blacks 2,263,112

What you say doesn't exist in the real world.

2.5 times the arrests for 5.7 times the population means you shitskins are arrested at a higher rate, stupid.

Nope. It shows that whites are arrested 2.6 times more than we are.

 

[IM2]

This doesn't seem to be the case in the real world.

2013 Robbery arrests
Whites: 32,945
Shitskins: 44,271
Table 43

2016 Arrests for all crimes

Whites 5,858,330
Blacks 2,263,112

What you say doesn't exist in the real world.

Retard alert only 13 percent of the population is black yet almost 30 percent of all criminals arrested were black.

Out of the 100 percent of the American population who are criminals, 70 percent are white.

...which would make sense, since whites are about 72% of the population. Meanwhile, shitskins are about 13% of the population and the same chart shows them to be at 27% of offenders! Throw in the fact that shitskins are even more overrepresented in stupid violent crime categories like robbery and murder and you turds are even worse.

No it makes no sense.

 

[bgrouse]

So whites consume more of one particular drug.

And? Who gives a shit what their drug of choice is? If the worst thing about blacks was that they quietly killed themselves out of sight, I doubt too many people would have a problem with them.That's the thing, it's not just murder, it's other much more common violent crimes as well. The murder rate is just an indicator of their violence. It's not a few really bad black apples with the rest of blacks being equal to whites. They all tend to be worse, with some exceptions.

This doesn't seem to be the case in the real world.

2013 Robbery arrests
Whites: 32,945
Shitskins: 44,271
Table 43

2016 Arrests for all crimes

Whites 5,858,330
Blacks 2,263,112

What you say doesn't exist in the real world.

2.5 times the arrests for 5.7 times the population means you shitskins are arrested at a higher rate, stupid.

Nope. It shows that whites are arrested 2.6 times more than we are.

...while being 5.7 times as large a group of people, meaning the arrest rate for blacks is more than twice that of whites.

 

[bgrouse]

2013 Robbery arrests
Whites: 32,945
Shitskins: 44,271
Table 43

2016 Arrests for all crimes

Whites 5,858,330
Blacks 2,263,112

What you say doesn't exist in the real world.

Retard alert only 13 percent of the population is black yet almost 30 percent of all criminals arrested were black.

Out of the 100 percent of the American population who are criminals, 70 percent are white.

...which would make sense, since whites are about 72% of the population. Meanwhile, shitskins are about 13% of the population and the same chart shows them to be at 27% of offenders! Throw in the fact that shitskins are even more overrepresented in stupid violent crime categories like robbery and murder and you turds are even worse.

No it makes no sense.

That's because your inferior shitskin brain can't grasp rates. Here, let me make it easier:

Ford makes 10 cars. 9 of them break.
Toyota makes 100 cars. 10 of them break.

Which brand is better? Ford because fewer Fords broke?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So whites consume more of one particular drug.

And? Who gives a shit what their drug of choice is? If the worst thing about blacks was that they quietly killed themselves out of sight, I doubt too many people would have a problem with them.That's the thing, it's not just murder, it's other much more common violent crimes as well. The murder rate is just an indicator of their violence. It's not a few really bad black apples with the rest of blacks being equal to whites. They all tend to be worse, with some exceptions.

This doesn't seem to be the case in the real world.

2013 Robbery arrests
Whites: 32,945
Shitskins: 44,271
Table 43

2016 Arrests for all crimes

Whites 5,858,330
Blacks 2,263,112

What you say doesn't exist in the real world.

Retard alert only 13 percent of the population is black yet almost 30 percent of all criminals arrested were black.

Out of the 100 percent of the American population who are criminals, 70 percent are white.

No they are not retard 30 percent are black that leaves Hispanics and whites to share the remaining 70 percent.

 

[ptbw forever]

LOL it does that you retard.

No it does not.

It includes all the population of a group in the measurement. There is only one way to accurately measure crime, take the number of crimes and the number of people of each race committing those crimes and leave the rest out. Per capita doesn't do that. .Do you understand fool? No. Because you don't want to. You keep lying to yourself and what you fail to understand that as long as you deny the larger problem you whites have with crime, the greater the chance is you get done by another white. So stay stupid if you want to.

Per capita is the percent of the population in question in relation to the over all stat being reported on you RETARD. the black race in America is 13 percent of the total population and per capita tells us the percent of blacks that commit a set crime it does not relate to the percent of blacks until the two are compared but when 50 percent of murder is committed by blacks and only 13 percent of the population is black we have a ******* problem, a major problem. When 30 percent of violent crime is committed by 13 percent of the population we have a MAJOR problem fuckwad. Per capita tells us how many people in the population considered are doing the event reported on.

When whites commit 7 out of every ten crimes that's the problem.

But they don't dumb ass and actually since 70 percent of the Country is white that means the right percent of the population is doing the crime per capita. Meanwhile Blacks commit 30 percent of violent crime which is a MUCH higher percent per population then whites and we haven't even factored in the Hispanics.

Yes, you have factored in the Hispanics if you say 70% of the population is White. But you did not factor in the Hispanics/ Latinos who are Black within that 13% of the Black population. There are more than 125 million Black descendants throughout Latin America and they come here just like the Mestizos do...but you might not recognize them since they look just like native born Blacks..

Without Mestizos who identity as white the number and percentage would be even lower. That is not the same as adding white Hispanics(Spaniards, Portuguese) to the white category.

Adding black Hispanics to the black category is the same as adding white Hispanics to the white category, it is perfectly legitimate.

 

[80zephyr]

Since the board black racists insist per capita and percent of population is not valid they must agree this story is a lie right? Black Unemployment 86% Higher Than White

There are no black racists here. You white racists need to understand that your every defense from the fact you are the most violent criminals in this nation by number cannot be defended by per capita.

Per capital is not a defense, dipshit. It simply puts the issue of negro violence in proper context.

Now I'm going out for a walk in my neighborhood without the slightest fear of getting shot.

Oh, really! I can do the same i my neighborhood. But tell me... what neighborhoods did those 4,192 Whites who were arrested for murder in 2016 live in? That number is not too far off that of 4,935 Black arrestees! 743 more Blacks were arrested for murder if that makes you feel better but they aren't targeting White people... the White killers are.

Too funny, thanks.

Nearly 5000 blacks arrested for murder, primarily of other blacks. Thirteen percent of the population, 5000 arrests. Whites comprise roughly 75% of the population but had 700 fewer arrests.

Won't embarrass your pea brain by working out the per capita numbers for you.

Even a dropout like you should know that whites do not make up 75% of the population.
And i know the per capita numbers published by White zombies like you who hate Black people. I just don't trust the people who compile the data. The FBI UCR and other crime reporting systems can be no better than the weakest link.. That being the biased corrupt reporting agencies who manipulate the numbers before sending them to the FBI. That's how they justify their existence....by underreporting white serious crimes and over reporting any crimes commited by blacks.
Fudge factor: Cooking the books on crime stats

If you include white Hispanics, whites make up 77.3% of the population. If they aren't included its 62%

Mark

 

[JQPublic1]

No it does not.

It includes all the population of a group in the measurement. There is only one way to accurately measure crime, take the number of crimes and the number of people of each race committing those crimes and leave the rest out. Per capita doesn't do that. .Do you understand fool? No. Because you don't want to. You keep lying to yourself and what you fail to understand that as long as you deny the larger problem you whites have with crime, the greater the chance is you get done by another white. So stay stupid if you want to.

Per capita is the percent of the population in question in relation to the over all stat being reported on you RETARD. the black race in America is 13 percent of the total population and per capita tells us the percent of blacks that commit a set crime it does not relate to the percent of blacks until the two are compared but when 50 percent of murder is committed by blacks and only 13 percent of the population is black we have a ******* problem, a major problem. When 30 percent of violent crime is committed by 13 percent of the population we have a MAJOR problem fuckwad. Per capita tells us how many people in the population considered are doing the event reported on.

When whites commit 7 out of every ten crimes that's the problem.

But they don't dumb ass and actually since 70 percent of the Country is white that means the right percent of the population is doing the crime per capita. Meanwhile Blacks commit 30 percent of violent crime which is a MUCH higher percent per population then whites and we haven't even factored in the Hispanics.

Yes, you have factored in the Hispanics if you say 70% of the population is White. But you did not factor in the Hispanics/ Latinos who are Black within that 13% of the Black population. There are more than 125 million Black descendants throughout Latin America and they come here just like the Mestizos do...but you might not recognize them since they look just like native born Blacks..

Without Mestizos who identity as white the number and percentage would be even lower. That is not the same as adding white Hispanics(Spaniards, Portuguese) to the white category.

Adding black Hispanics to the black category is the same as adding white Hispanics to the white category, it is perfectly legitimate.

I have addressed this numerous times in this thread. Did you miss the post showing the Census Bureau says nonHispanic whites are a little over 61% of the US population? Go back and find it or just visit the site.

 

[JQPublic1]

There are no black racists here. You white racists need to understand that your every defense from the fact you are the most violent criminals in this nation by number cannot be defended by per capita.

Per capital is not a defense, dipshit. It simply puts the issue of negro violence in proper context.

Now I'm going out for a walk in my neighborhood without the slightest fear of getting shot.

Oh, really! I can do the same i my neighborhood. But tell me... what neighborhoods did those 4,192 Whites who were arrested for murder in 2016 live in? That number is not too far off that of 4,935 Black arrestees! 743 more Blacks were arrested for murder if that makes you feel better but they aren't targeting White people... the White killers are.

Too funny, thanks.

Nearly 5000 blacks arrested for murder, primarily of other blacks. Thirteen percent of the population, 5000 arrests. Whites comprise roughly 75% of the population but had 700 fewer arrests.

Won't embarrass your pea brain by working out the per capita numbers for you.

Even a dropout like you should know that whites do not make up 75% of the population.
And i know the per capita numbers published by White zombies like you who hate Black people. I just don't trust the people who compile the data. The FBI UCR and other crime reporting systems can be no better than the weakest link.. That being the biased corrupt reporting agencies who manipulate the numbers before sending them to the FBI. That's how they justify their existence....by underreporting white serious crimes and over reporting any crimes commited by blacks.
Fudge factor: Cooking the books on crime stats

If you include white Hispanics, whites make up 77.3% of the population. If they aren't included its 62%

Mark

In my calculations i use the Census Bureau count of 62% for non Hispanic Whites. Some times I round the percentage up and sometimes I don't.

 

[Correll]

Actually I wouldnt be worried unless I was going to one of the shit stain cities run by democrats. You know where all that black crime occurs 50 percent of all MURDERS are by blacks.

The media does seem to portray black criminality as endemic in large metropolitan counties but table 55a of the UCR seems to dispell that myth entirely.:View attachment 182186

1. My God, you do share IM2's math views. So, certainly, you need to be here.


2. I like the way your image just HAPPENED to put a thick red line over the murder stats, to hide the white vs black murder numbers. But you didn't consider that the percentage column on the other side of the page tells the story. ie of blacks committing murder way beyond their portion of the population.


3. And of course, hispanics are lumped in with whites to further hide the truth.

I drew the circle to focus on the topic at hand. I submitted the graphic in response to the good Sarge's suggestion that Blacks are committing most of the crime in those "shit stain" cities. Table 55A shows that it is whites committing most of the crime in Metropolitan counties which includes cities. But since you mentioned it Blacks committed fewer murders than Whites in Metro Counties too. Here is the unmarked table:

View attachment 182247

40% of the murders compared to "whites" 58%, and that's with hispanics lumped in with whites.

So, sure the media reports a lot more murders than robberies, so the blacks commit more murders than any other single group,


thus the perception that blacks commit the majority of the crime, completely understandable.

Your errors:
1. Hispanics can be Black too and they are lumped in with native Blacks.

2. If you subtract White Hispanics from Whites you will have a smaller group of Whites who commit more murders than Hispanics do in the USA.. Your rate per 1000 will be higher.

3, There is an ethnic breakdown of Hispanic and non Hispanic murders on the same page..to the far left. But the non Hispanics numbersa are of all races combined.

4. It is NOT acceptable that Blacks are assumed to commit more crime because they are arrested for murder at a higher rate per 1000 and that rate is 0.12 per 1000. Less than 1. WHOOPIE... So where is that astronomical murder rate you flaky mathematicians keep harping on?

1. Most are not. Most are lumped in with whites.

2.NO, you won't. Don't be silly.

3. How does it relate to the "White numbers"?


4. That murder looms larger in perception is acceptable and completely reasonable. The black rate is much higher than the white rate.

 

[JQPublic1]

The media does seem to portray black criminality as endemic in large metropolitan counties but table 55a of the UCR seems to dispell that myth entirely.:View attachment 182186

1. My God, you do share IM2's math views. So, certainly, you need to be here.


2. I like the way your image just HAPPENED to put a thick red line over the murder stats, to hide the white vs black murder numbers. But you didn't consider that the percentage column on the other side of the page tells the story. ie of blacks committing murder way beyond their portion of the population.


3. And of course, hispanics are lumped in with whites to further hide the truth.

I drew the circle to focus on the topic at hand. I submitted the graphic in response to the good Sarge's suggestion that Blacks are committing most of the crime in those "shit stain" cities. Table 55A shows that it is whites committing most of the crime in Metropolitan counties which includes cities. But since you mentioned it Blacks committed fewer murders than Whites in Metro Counties too. Here is the unmarked table:

View attachment 182247

40% of the murders compared to "whites" 58%, and that's with hispanics lumped in with whites.

So, sure the media reports a lot more murders than robberies, so the blacks commit more murders than any other single group,


thus the perception that blacks commit the majority of the crime, completely understandable.

Your errors:
1. Hispanics can be Black too and they are lumped in with native Blacks.

2. If you subtract White Hispanics from Whites you will have a smaller group of Whites who commit more murders than Hispanics do in the USA.. Your rate per 1000 will be higher.

3, There is an ethnic breakdown of Hispanic and non Hispanic murders on the same page..to the far left. But the non Hispanics numbersa are of all races combined.

4. It is NOT acceptable that Blacks are assumed to commit more crime because they are arrested for murder at a higher rate per 1000 and that rate is 0.12 per 1000. Less than 1. WHOOPIE... So where is that astronomical murder rate you flaky mathematicians keep harping on?

1. Most are not. Most are lumped in with whites.

2.NO, you won't. Don't be silly.

3. How does it relate to the "White numbers"?


4. That murder looms larger in perception is acceptable and completely reasonable. The black rate is much higher than the white rate.

That's not my problem. Since race is a social construct any way, the whole concept of black, white hispanic, et.al. is an illusion to begin with. BTW, the term Hispanic is not .a racial identifier...except in a racial obsessed hegemonic place like the USA. If there is any logic to be gleaned from your pseudoscientific menagerie in defining who is white, it would be the all encompassing term Caucasian.

2. Silly? Do the math and stop assuming.
According to the UCR, of which you have trouble deciphering, it shows that bonefide citizens of Hispanic descent commit fewer crimes proportionally and in raw numbers than Blacks or whites.
3. You have to actually look at table 21A to find out. Be my guest.

4. And if you do the math...the murder rate per capita for any race is so low as ti be meaningless. The murder rate per every 100000 blacks nationally is 12. Since you might have trouble with all the zeroes, I'll put it in plain English for ya. That's means for every 100 thousand blacks, only 12 were arrested fotlr murder in 2016. I don't care that a number so low is 6 times that of the white rate per 100, 000. When the rate per 100 k reaches 500 lgive me a call.

 

[IM2]

The media does seem to portray black criminality as endemic in large metropolitan counties but table 55a of the UCR seems to dispell that myth entirely.:View attachment 182186

1. My God, you do share IM2's math views. So, certainly, you need to be here.


2. I like the way your image just HAPPENED to put a thick red line over the murder stats, to hide the white vs black murder numbers. But you didn't consider that the percentage column on the other side of the page tells the story. ie of blacks committing murder way beyond their portion of the population.


3. And of course, hispanics are lumped in with whites to further hide the truth.

I drew the circle to focus on the topic at hand. I submitted the graphic in response to the good Sarge's suggestion that Blacks are committing most of the crime in those "shit stain" cities. Table 55A shows that it is whites committing most of the crime in Metropolitan counties which includes cities. But since you mentioned it Blacks committed fewer murders than Whites in Metro Counties too. Here is the unmarked table:

View attachment 182247

40% of the murders compared to "whites" 58%, and that's with hispanics lumped in with whites.

So, sure the media reports a lot more murders than robberies, so the blacks commit more murders than any other single group,


thus the perception that blacks commit the majority of the crime, completely understandable.

Your errors:
1. Hispanics can be Black too and they are lumped in with native Blacks.

2. If you subtract White Hispanics from Whites you will have a smaller group of Whites who commit more murders than Hispanics do in the USA.. Your rate per 1000 will be higher.

3, There is an ethnic breakdown of Hispanic and non Hispanic murders on the same page..to the far left. But the non Hispanics numbersa are of all races combined.

4. It is NOT acceptable that Blacks are assumed to commit more crime because they are arrested for murder at a higher rate per 1000 and that rate is 0.12 per 1000. Less than 1. WHOOPIE... So where is that astronomical murder rate you flaky mathematicians keep harping on?

1. Most are not. Most are lumped in with whites.

2.NO, you won't. Don't be silly.

3. How does it relate to the "White numbers"?


4. That murder looms larger in perception is acceptable and completely reasonable. The black rate is much higher than the white rate.

Picking out one crime that really amounts to a very small amount does nothing to dispute the fact that whites commit the most crimes. All crimes.

 

[Correll]

1. My God, you do share IM2's math views. So, certainly, you need to be here.


2. I like the way your image just HAPPENED to put a thick red line over the murder stats, to hide the white vs black murder numbers. But you didn't consider that the percentage column on the other side of the page tells the story. ie of blacks committing murder way beyond their portion of the population.


3. And of course, hispanics are lumped in with whites to further hide the truth.

I drew the circle to focus on the topic at hand. I submitted the graphic in response to the good Sarge's suggestion that Blacks are committing most of the crime in those "shit stain" cities. Table 55A shows that it is whites committing most of the crime in Metropolitan counties which includes cities. But since you mentioned it Blacks committed fewer murders than Whites in Metro Counties too. Here is the unmarked table:

View attachment 182247

40% of the murders compared to "whites" 58%, and that's with hispanics lumped in with whites.

So, sure the media reports a lot more murders than robberies, so the blacks commit more murders than any other single group,


thus the perception that blacks commit the majority of the crime, completely understandable.

Your errors:
1. Hispanics can be Black too and they are lumped in with native Blacks.

2. If you subtract White Hispanics from Whites you will have a smaller group of Whites who commit more murders than Hispanics do in the USA.. Your rate per 1000 will be higher.

3, There is an ethnic breakdown of Hispanic and non Hispanic murders on the same page..to the far left. But the non Hispanics numbersa are of all races combined.

4. It is NOT acceptable that Blacks are assumed to commit more crime because they are arrested for murder at a higher rate per 1000 and that rate is 0.12 per 1000. Less than 1. WHOOPIE... So where is that astronomical murder rate you flaky mathematicians keep harping on?

1. Most are not. Most are lumped in with whites.

2.NO, you won't. Don't be silly.

3. How does it relate to the "White numbers"?


4. That murder looms larger in perception is acceptable and completely reasonable. The black rate is much higher than the white rate.

That's not my problem. Since race is a social construct any way, the whole concept of black, white hispanic, et.al. is an illusion to begin with. BTW, the term Hispanic is not .a racial identifier...except in a racial obsessed hegemonic place like the USA. If there is any logic to be gleaned from your pseudoscientific menagerie in defining who is white, it would be the all encompassing term Caucasian.

2. Silly? Do the math and stop assuming.
According to the UCR, of which you have trouble deciphering, it shows that bonefide citizens of Hispanic descent commit fewer crimes proportionally and in raw numbers than Blacks or whites.
3. You have to actually look at table 21A to find out. Be my guest.

4. And if you do the math...the murder rate per capita for any race is so low as ti be meaningless. The murder rate per every 100000 blacks nationally is 12. Since you might have trouble with all the zeroes, I'll put it in plain English for ya. That's means for every 100 thousand blacks, only 12 were arrested fotlr murder in 2016. I don't care that a number so low is 6 times that of the white rate per 100, 000. When the rate per 100 k reaches 500 lgive me a call.

1. If you want to discuss crime rates in different groups, it is. Social Construct? LOL!! I'll be sure to bring that up the next time one of you lefties pulls the Race Card.

2. Considering the massive hispanic gang problem, that is not credible. Some one is ******* up, either on purpose or not.

3. It was not clearly explained.

4. Actually a reasonable argument, in some contexts, even most. but we are discussing perception, filtered though the sensationalist media, and they give far more air time to murder. My point was that it was reasonable of the other poster to perceive blacks, committing the most murders of any group to be committing the most crime.

 

[Correll]

1. My God, you do share IM2's math views. So, certainly, you need to be here.


2. I like the way your image just HAPPENED to put a thick red line over the murder stats, to hide the white vs black murder numbers. But you didn't consider that the percentage column on the other side of the page tells the story. ie of blacks committing murder way beyond their portion of the population.


3. And of course, hispanics are lumped in with whites to further hide the truth.

I drew the circle to focus on the topic at hand. I submitted the graphic in response to the good Sarge's suggestion that Blacks are committing most of the crime in those "shit stain" cities. Table 55A shows that it is whites committing most of the crime in Metropolitan counties which includes cities. But since you mentioned it Blacks committed fewer murders than Whites in Metro Counties too. Here is the unmarked table:

View attachment 182247

40% of the murders compared to "whites" 58%, and that's with hispanics lumped in with whites.

So, sure the media reports a lot more murders than robberies, so the blacks commit more murders than any other single group,


thus the perception that blacks commit the majority of the crime, completely understandable.

Your errors:
1. Hispanics can be Black too and they are lumped in with native Blacks.

2. If you subtract White Hispanics from Whites you will have a smaller group of Whites who commit more murders than Hispanics do in the USA.. Your rate per 1000 will be higher.

3, There is an ethnic breakdown of Hispanic and non Hispanic murders on the same page..to the far left. But the non Hispanics numbersa are of all races combined.

4. It is NOT acceptable that Blacks are assumed to commit more crime because they are arrested for murder at a higher rate per 1000 and that rate is 0.12 per 1000. Less than 1. WHOOPIE... So where is that astronomical murder rate you flaky mathematicians keep harping on?

1. Most are not. Most are lumped in with whites.

2.NO, you won't. Don't be silly.

3. How does it relate to the "White numbers"?


4. That murder looms larger in perception is acceptable and completely reasonable. The black rate is much higher than the white rate.

Picking out one crime that really amounts to a very small amount does nothing to dispute the fact that whites commit the most crimes. All crimes.

CALLING ALL LIBS.


Here is the deal. THis liberal doesn't understand, proportions.


I've tried to explain it to him, but he doesn't hear anything I say.


Is there any liberal here reading this who thinks they can explain the concept to him?

Coming from an ally, he might be more receptive.


It is notable that IM2 seems very racist, so it would be best is the teacher here would be black. But any white libs are welcome to try.


A white lib comfortable lying about being black, might work too.

 

[IM2]

I drew the circle to focus on the topic at hand. I submitted the graphic in response to the good Sarge's suggestion that Blacks are committing most of the crime in those "shit stain" cities. Table 55A shows that it is whites committing most of the crime in Metropolitan counties which includes cities. But since you mentioned it Blacks committed fewer murders than Whites in Metro Counties too. Here is the unmarked table:

View attachment 182247

40% of the murders compared to "whites" 58%, and that's with hispanics lumped in with whites.

So, sure the media reports a lot more murders than robberies, so the blacks commit more murders than any other single group,


thus the perception that blacks commit the majority of the crime, completely understandable.

Your errors:
1. Hispanics can be Black too and they are lumped in with native Blacks.

2. If you subtract White Hispanics from Whites you will have a smaller group of Whites who commit more murders than Hispanics do in the USA.. Your rate per 1000 will be higher.

3, There is an ethnic breakdown of Hispanic and non Hispanic murders on the same page..to the far left. But the non Hispanics numbersa are of all races combined.

4. It is NOT acceptable that Blacks are assumed to commit more crime because they are arrested for murder at a higher rate per 1000 and that rate is 0.12 per 1000. Less than 1. WHOOPIE... So where is that astronomical murder rate you flaky mathematicians keep harping on?

1. Most are not. Most are lumped in with whites.

2.NO, you won't. Don't be silly.

3. How does it relate to the "White numbers"?


4. That murder looms larger in perception is acceptable and completely reasonable. The black rate is much higher than the white rate.

Picking out one crime that really amounts to a very small amount does nothing to dispute the fact that whites commit the most crimes. All crimes.

CALLING ALL LIBS.


Here is the deal. THis liberal doesn't understand, proportions.


I've tried to explain it to him, but he doesn't hear anything I say.


Is there any liberal here reading this who thinks they can explain the concept to him?

Coming from an ally, he might be more receptive.


It is notable that IM2 seems very racist, so it would be best is the teacher here would be black. But any white libs are welcome to try.


A white lib comfortable lying about being black, might work too.

You can't explain anything to me because you don't know your ass from your nose and think you are sneezing hen wonder why your pants are brown. I understand proportion better than you. And you have been shown why your claims based on proportion is invalid.

 

[Correll]

40% of the murders compared to "whites" 58%, and that's with hispanics lumped in with whites.

So, sure the media reports a lot more murders than robberies, so the blacks commit more murders than any other single group,


thus the perception that blacks commit the majority of the crime, completely understandable.

Your errors:
1. Hispanics can be Black too and they are lumped in with native Blacks.

2. If you subtract White Hispanics from Whites you will have a smaller group of Whites who commit more murders than Hispanics do in the USA.. Your rate per 1000 will be higher.

3, There is an ethnic breakdown of Hispanic and non Hispanic murders on the same page..to the far left. But the non Hispanics numbersa are of all races combined.

4. It is NOT acceptable that Blacks are assumed to commit more crime because they are arrested for murder at a higher rate per 1000 and that rate is 0.12 per 1000. Less than 1. WHOOPIE... So where is that astronomical murder rate you flaky mathematicians keep harping on?

1. Most are not. Most are lumped in with whites.

2.NO, you won't. Don't be silly.

3. How does it relate to the "White numbers"?


4. That murder looms larger in perception is acceptable and completely reasonable. The black rate is much higher than the white rate.

Picking out one crime that really amounts to a very small amount does nothing to dispute the fact that whites commit the most crimes. All crimes.

CALLING ALL LIBS.


Here is the deal. THis liberal doesn't understand, proportions.


I've tried to explain it to him, but he doesn't hear anything I say.


Is there any liberal here reading this who thinks they can explain the concept to him?

Coming from an ally, he might be more receptive.


It is notable that IM2 seems very racist, so it would be best is the teacher here would be black. But any white libs are welcome to try.


A white lib comfortable lying about being black, might work too.

You can't explain anything to me because you don't know your ass from your nose and think you are sneezing hen wonder why your pants are brown. I understand proportion better than you. And you have been shown why your claims based on proportion is invalid.

I'm actually a very good teacher, with quite a lot of experience.


You have massive barriers to communication. Your preconceived ideas, both of the subject and of anyone that doesn't agree with you on nearly everything, and maybe share your race, is bullet proof.


THe problem is you.