Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Except for the evidence you have previously been presented with.So, no evidence, then?
Alright . . .
Well, since I never claimed there were gods, I would have no need to present evidence for them.Except for the evidence you have previously been presented with.
No evidence for your gods? Supernaturalism performed by the gods should be easy to identify. Anything outside of naturally occurring processes like... I don't know.... talking snakes or mammal fossils in the sedimentary layers as early reptiles would be good.
Anything like that?
When your attempts at argument are perfectly aligned with and represent the same science loathing pablum that oozes from creation ministries, one can make informed judgements.Well, since I never claimed there were gods, I would have no need to present evidence for them.
I'm not sure how a talking snake would be preserved as such in a fossil. Would there be speech bubbles above the snake's head in the fossil?
Makes about as much sense as some interpretations of fossils, I guess.
As usual I don't think either of us know what you're talking about. Rather than attack me why don't you answer the question: do you accept uniformitarianism?so you were just making it up,,,
at least the creationist admit it all on faith,, your guys religion is just crazy people talking out your ass's,,
how about before you make claims about what all geologist think you should actually look it up first,,As usual I don't think either of us know what you're talking about. Rather than attack me why don't you answer the question: do you accept uniformitarianism?
I eagerly await your links.how about before you make claims about what all geologist think you should actually look it up first,,
I did and what you claimed isnt true,, theres a lot of them that dont support it,,
how about you provide your link since you made the first claim??I eagerly await your links.
Don't be confused by catastrophism since even though things like floods, volcanic eruptions, and meteor strikes are very rare they are continually, one might say uniformly, occurring.
how about you provide your link since you made the first claim??
you do realize your link proves your claim wrong dont you??
There is a place for both claims. Reality is never so neat as we'd like.you do realize your link proves your claim wrong dont you??
no there isnt,,There is a place for both claims. Reality is never so neat as we'd like.
''A lot of them.''how about before you make claims about what all geologist think you should actually look it up first,,
I did and what you claimed isnt true,, theres a lot of them that dont support it,,
So which do you claim it is? Uniformitarianism, catastrophism, a combination, or something totally different?no there isnt,,
and youre the only one claiming neat and easy,,
I have been clear its far more complicated and unknown,,
I didnt claim it was or wasnt any of them,,So which do you claim it is? Uniformitarianism, catastrophism, a combination, or something totally different?
A powerhouse of equivocation.I didnt claim it was or wasnt any of them,,
First you claimed there wasn't a place for both claims now you're backpedaling. I guess you're never wrong if you're on both sides of the issue.I didnt claim it was or wasnt any of them,,
if you bothered to read what I said you would see I'm on neither side of the issue because neither can be proven and are opinions based on assumptions,,First you claimed there wasn't a place for both claims now you're backpedaling. I guess you're never wrong if you're on both sides of the issue.
Keep ignoring the evidence and reciting your mantra, you'll likely sleep better.opinions based on assumptions
Change in species over time is proven. Biological organisms evolve. It is primarily hyper-religious Christians who are the science deniers.if you bothered to read what I said you would see I'm on neither side of the issue because neither can be proven and are opinions based on assumptions,,
Not humans from monkeys. Biological organisms do not evolve like that. Creationists have creation science which explains origins and how natural selection works and doesn't work. Thus, you are partially correct with microevolution and totally wrong with macroevolution. That's fair.Change in species over time is proven. Biological organisms evolve. It is primarily hyper-religious Christians who are the science deniers.
