bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,372
- 2,180
13 of these "crimes" were just tossed out the window. The remaining charges have nothing to do with "collusion."Most Americans donât realize Robert Muellerâs investigation has uncovered crimes
17 indictments and five guilty pleas so far.
By Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesiasmatt@vox.com May 23, 2018, 11:00am EDT
New Poll: Most Americans donât realize Robert Muellerâs investigation has uncovered crimes
and
Even FOX News minus the Celebrity Loons who host programs admit facts
Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far? POLITICS June 15th
Special Counsel Robert Muellerâs inquiry into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election is ongoing â and secret.
So far, four former Trump campaign associates â Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Richard Gates and George Papadopoulos â have been charged, though none of the charges are directly related to any misconduct by the president's campaign.
Alex van der Zwaan, an attorney, pleaded guilty to lying to FBI investigators during the investigation, and was sentenced to 30 days in prison in April 2018. He was the first to be sentenced in the probe.
The special counsel filed new tax evasion and bank fraud charges against Manafort and Gates in late February, potentially increasing the amount of prison time the pair could face if convicted at trial. The charges are similar to those filed in October.
Here's a closer look at those who have faced charges throughout Mueller's probe.
Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far?
This thing is a farce.
It's not over shithead
13 Indictments of Trump's Russian pals
What Mueller's Indictment Reveals - The Atlantic
It's over, turd:
Muellerâs Concord Mismanagement Is Convulsing
Playing his own Russian card left him vulnerable to âgraymailâ thatâs turning into his undoing.
On February 16, 2018, Special Counsel Robert Mueller obtained a federal indictment of 13 Russian nationals and 3 Russian companies for conspiring to wage âinformation warfareâ by âimpairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful functions of the United States by dishonest means in order to enable Defendants to interfere with U.S. political processes, including the 2016 presidential election.â
The media heralded the indictment as a major achievement by Team Mueller. But a few observers questioned whether Mueller truly expected any of the defendants to appear in a U.S. court to answer the charges. Others asked if the indictment was merely an empty public relations gesture by the special counselâs office attempting to show that its investigation was producing solid results.
Against all expectations, in April 2018, lawyers for one of the Russian corporate defendants, Concord Management and Consulting, LLC (âConcordâ), entered their appearances in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. They then served extensive discovery requests on Team Mueller seeking full disclosure of the governmentâs case and investigation including sensitive national security and intelligence information.
This type of discovery is called âgraymail,â in which the government must disclose closely guarded state secrets in order to proceed with the prosecution. The alternative is to drop the charges.
So, should Team Mueller bother to litigate the discovery requests? The maximum penalty against Concord is a $500,000 fine or compensation to anyone damaged by the alleged conspiracy. But these may be mere theoretical penalties since there appears to be no way for the government to levy Concordâs assets in Russia. In short, even if the prosecution wins at trial, no one will go to prison and the fines may be uncollectible. So whatâs the point of the exercise?
If the Muellerites lose the discovery litigation and are faced with having to disclose sensitive intelligence about the case and their investigation, should they withdraw the indictment against Concord? And, if they drop the charges, are they prepared for the resulting public relations disaster?
Bottom line: how did such a purportedly smart bunch of lawyers get themselves into this fix?
Playing his own Russian card left him vulnerable to âgraymailâ thatâs turning into his undoing.
On February 16, 2018, Special Counsel Robert Mueller obtained a federal indictment of 13 Russian nationals and 3 Russian companies for conspiring to wage âinformation warfareâ by âimpairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful functions of the United States by dishonest means in order to enable Defendants to interfere with U.S. political processes, including the 2016 presidential election.â
The media heralded the indictment as a major achievement by Team Mueller. But a few observers questioned whether Mueller truly expected any of the defendants to appear in a U.S. court to answer the charges. Others asked if the indictment was merely an empty public relations gesture by the special counselâs office attempting to show that its investigation was producing solid results.
Against all expectations, in April 2018, lawyers for one of the Russian corporate defendants, Concord Management and Consulting, LLC (âConcordâ), entered their appearances in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. They then served extensive discovery requests on Team Mueller seeking full disclosure of the governmentâs case and investigation including sensitive national security and intelligence information.
This type of discovery is called âgraymail,â in which the government must disclose closely guarded state secrets in order to proceed with the prosecution. The alternative is to drop the charges.
So, should Team Mueller bother to litigate the discovery requests? The maximum penalty against Concord is a $500,000 fine or compensation to anyone damaged by the alleged conspiracy. But these may be mere theoretical penalties since there appears to be no way for the government to levy Concordâs assets in Russia. In short, even if the prosecution wins at trial, no one will go to prison and the fines may be uncollectible. So whatâs the point of the exercise?
If the Muellerites lose the discovery litigation and are faced with having to disclose sensitive intelligence about the case and their investigation, should they withdraw the indictment against Concord? And, if they drop the charges, are they prepared for the resulting public relations disaster?
Bottom line: how did such a purportedly smart bunch of lawyers get themselves into this fix?