Should This Conservative Judge Be Charged For Treason??

[Magnus]

Don't care. The hearings are for the low IQ types that believe their UNiparty nonsense. Like yourself
Good luck with that Maganus

Thanks. And you retards can keep watching the pillow guys crap or salivate over the 2000 moron movie!!

 

[22lcidw]

In other words, the motive is more important than the act itself?

So, if your house was robbed, you would be very forgiving and not press charges if the perp's motive was to feed his family?

As for your other claim that there is no opportunity to present the other case... whose fault is that? Other than Cheney and Kinzinger, Repubs refused to participate. So, losing their chance to present their side of the events.

You got to hand it to the Repubs. If they can find a way to lose, they will.

But what if the people living in the house were the robbers and no one would listen to those who were accusing them.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

This ridiculous J6 investigation would have died a long time ago if the media wasn't so invested in the bogus idea of insurrection. J6 is a conclusion looking for justification.

Spirit of '76

What's wrong with insurrection anyway?

 

[Magnus]

But what if the people living in the house were the robbers and no one would listen to those who were accusing them.

Are you feeling ok, buddy? You have been warned about not taking your meds before, right? Hope you feel better.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Thanks. And you retards can keep watching the pillow guys crap or salivate over the 2000 moron movie!!

And you deep thinkers can concentrate on the all important questions like how many genders does it take to make an insane person feel normal & how young is too young to groom them?
We'll be waiting for more of your deep thoughts on these proggy conundrums

 

[Magnus]

And you deep thinkers can concentrate on the all important questions like how many genders does it take to make an insane person feel normal & how young is too young to groom them?
We'll be waiting for more of your deep thoughts on these proggy conundrums

Sure. Keep watching and reading. Who knows, you may even learn a thing or two. I doubt it since retards like you are pretty much a lost cause. But hey, surprise me.

Back at ya, retard.

 

[hjmick]

No.

 

[whitehall]

We are in deep shit as a Nation when the radical left wants to charge a retired judge with freaking treason for merely voicing his 1st Amendment opinion. How do they get away with this stuff when a sitting democrat senator advocated violence against Supreme Court Justices that led to an assassination attempt?

 

[alang1216]

The Dems are weak and stupid -- yet, also brilliant and powerful enough to make life-long republicans do their dirty work for them....

So they are stupid but still smarter than republicans? Got it.

Now we have this so-called respected Constitutional Conservative judge --- who is willing to throw away his reputation just to claim that the Vice President doesn't have the power to overturn elections?? Are you serious???

Or he is one of the few unwilling to throw away his reputation just to kiss up to Trump.

Every one who has just a cursory knowledge of the Constitution knows that the vice president absolutely has the power to overturn the election....

Funny that actual legal scholars disagree. Your law degree is from where?

It has happened before, just over 20 years ago....Al Gore refused to certify the election and tried to steal that election away from Bush.....

Demanding a recount in a close election is not the same as claiming fraud that has yet to be proven. Gore was the VP, I guess you feel he'd have been justified to throw out any electors he didn't like even if the remaining ones gave him the election?

the Dems even tried to intimidate Congress to force them to overthrow the election and block God's anointed candidate

God wanted us to invade Iraq and occupy Afghanistan?

-- and if it wasn't for the Supreme Court -- we would have been robbed of Bush's leadership over the next 8 years......

If only.

So this belief that Vice Presidents can't overturn elections is false.....However, if that darkie whore Kamala believes she has the power to do it, , she would be wrong, because the framers never intended for darkies to have that power, so she would be disqualified.....

Now I expect the usual Trumpers on this message board to do what they normally do -- deflect from the actual facts -- but what you won't see them do is -- explain why they believe a Republican vice president could refuse to certify an election, but a Democratic vice president can't -- at least, they can't explain it without looking like Anti-Democratic illiberal hypocritical morons....

I think you've adequately removed your sheet and revealed who you are.

 

[Seymour Flops]

One person familiar with Luttig's planned testimony said he sees his appearance before the committee as a serious and sobering moment

That's hilarious! I was just trying to get that rightwinger dude to explain why Luttig was showed up drunk to such a serious hearing.

He starts trying to talk about about 4:15 . . .

 

[Coyote]

Thats a bit of revisionist history isnt it? The R's didnt decide to not participate they werent allowed to have anyone they wanted to participate do so by the D's. If I were a prosecutor I'd like to pick the defense attorney too.

Essentially yes, they did decide. They could have had a 9/11 style bipartisan independent commission, but they nixed it. That left the more partisan special commission option. Then they chose the two members most likely to be investigated to be on the Commission... out of how many Republicans they could have chosen? Then they refused to participate and ordered their Republican members not to participate. This is all of their choosing.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

The questions of what motivated this, and who caused that, are just like any other generalizations. Some of the rioters wanted to destroy the System and install Trump as a permanent President, and some were just showing their anger what what appeared to be a stolen election.

The pity of the one-sided 1/6 hearings is that they provide no opportunity to present the other case, and imminently dubious information is presented without challenge.

There are some reputable Republicans, including this retired judge, whose opinion is very much against the President and his supporters, but the public hearings will present NO Republicans who can offer rational rebuttals or other explanations for what went on.

They are a disgrace. Nothing more than an attempt to slander 45 badly enough so that he won't or can't win in 2024.

Not a disgrace. It's what's called a win for the good guys. Keeping this big lie dog and pony show alive is the disgrace. Get on the side of America, for fucks sake, or get out.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

S

Sure. Keep watching and reading. Who knows, you may even learn a thing or two. I doubt it since retards like you are pretty much a lost cause. But hey, surprise me.

Back at ya, retard.

Same to you progbot!
Make sure to wear your mask, take your boosters & remember Big Brother is your friend

 

[Flash]

Former federal Judge Michael Luttig has stark message for Jan. 6 committee

Luttig, who advised Pence on his role in affirming the 2020 presidential election, will tell the panel that Trump's efforts to thwart the election meant "America's democracy was almost stolen from her."

www.cbsnews.com

"Retired federal Judge J. Michael Luttig, a staunch conservative long admired by many Republicans, will testify before the House's Jan. 6 committee on Thursday with an urgent and stark message for the panel about former President Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election: "America's democracy was almost stolen from her." Luttig will also likely state that the Republican National Committee is wrong to have referred to some of the events of Jan. 6, 2021 as "legitimate political discourse" and warn fellow conservatives to not ignore the gravity of what Trump did as he scrambled to hold onto the presidency that day.


One person familiar with Luttig's planned testimony said he sees his appearance before the committee as a serious and sobering moment similar to an appearance before the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump ally John Eastman, a former Luttig clerk, authored a two-page memo, embraced by Trump, which argues that the vice president could take steps to delay the certification and allow for states to send alternate slates of electors for consideration by Congress. Pence's former counsel, Greg Jacob and Luttig counseled Pence to avoid doing anything to rupture the congressional certification of the election — and to disregard advice from conservative lawyer and Trump."

The Dems are weak and stupid -- yet, also brilliant and powerful enough to make life-long republicans do their dirty work for them....Now we have this so-called respected Constitutional Conservative judge --- who is willing to throw away his reputation just to claim that the Vice President doesn't have the power to overturn elections?? Are you serious??? Every one who has just a cursory knowledge of the Constitution knows that the vice president absolutely has the power to overturn the election....It has happened before, just over 20 years ago....Al Gore refused to certify the election and tried to steal that election away from Bush.....the Dems even tried to intimidate Congress to force them to overthrow the election and block God's anointed candidate -- and if it wasn't for the Supreme Court -- we would have been robbed of Bush's leadership over the next 8 years......So this belief that Vice Presidents can't overturn elections is false.....However, if that darkie whore Kamala believes she has the power to do it, , she would be wrong, because the framers never intended for darkies to have that power, so she would be disqualified.....

Now I expect the usual Trumpers on this message board to do what they normally do -- deflect from the actual facts -- but what you won't see them do is -- explain why they believe a Republican vice president could refuse to certify an election, but a Democratic vice president can't -- at least, they can't explain it without looking like Anti-Democratic illiberal hypocritical morons....

The steal was when the Democrats used the scam of fraudulent unverified mail in and harvested ballots in Democrat controlled swing districts.

All Pence had to do as President of the Senate was to order an audit of the election, like was done in 1876. But he didn't do it. Instead he was a traitor to his country along with the Democrat filth and a few RINOs and allowed the Swamp to steal our Republic.

Shame!

Now we are stuck with this Potatohead peice of shit. The worst President in the history of the Republic and a banana republic.

 

[dudmuck]

The steal was when the Democrats used the scam of fraudulent unverified mail in and harvested ballots in Democrat controlled swing districts.

All Pence had to do as President of the Senate was to order an audit of the election, like was done in 1876. But he didn't do it. Instead he was a traitor to his country along with the Democrat filth and a few RINOs and allowed the Swamp to steal our Republic.

Shame!

Now we are stuck with this Potatohead peice of shit. The worst President in the history of the Republic and a banana republic.

there were plenty of audits, and all the found was more votes for Biden.
Youve been milked.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

The steal was when the Democrats used the scam of fraudulent unverified mail in and harvested ballots in Democrat controlled swing districts.

All Pence had to do as President of the Senate was to order an audit of the election, like was done in 1876. But he didn't do it. Instead he was a traitor to his country along with the Democrat filth and a few RINOs and allowed the Swamp to steal our Republic.

Shame!

Now we are stuck with this Potatohead peice of shit. The worst President in the history of the Republic and a banana republic.

Freely and fairly elected tho.

 

[rightwinger]

That's hilarious! I was just trying to get that rightwinger dude to explain why Luttig was showed up drunk to such a serious hearing.

He starts trying to talk about about 4:15 . . .

Like Rudy on Election night?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Like Rudy on Election night?

I'm sure Rudy drank heavily on election night. He'd just lost and his boss was trying to make it into a win.

Why would Luttig get drunk on the day of an important hearing?

 

[rightwinger]

I'm sure Rudy drank heavily on election night. He'd just lost and his boss was trying to make it into a win.

Why would Luttig get drunk on the day of an important hearing?

Because he is a Conservative and must testify to the Truth

 

[Seymour Flops]

Because he is a Conservative and must testify to the Truth

The Dems can have him. Maybe he can be your new Ted Kennedy.