g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 132,077
- 76,060
- 2,605
I guess that is one way to fix Social Security. One pandemic after another...Is that adjusted for COVD?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess that is one way to fix Social Security. One pandemic after another...Is that adjusted for COVD?
In my experience, I see people living much longer
I remember as a kid, grandparents would die in their 60’s to early 70s
Now, they live well into their 80s
Reasons
Much better healthcare in dealing with heart attacks, cancer, preventing strokes and screening for other health issues
Smoking has been cut by more than half
Well, my number one priority for fixing the federal debt has always been to ban all tax expenditures.We are on an unsustainable trend because of fiscal insanity by our political class (Ds and Rs). Just stop funding the enormous war machine and intelligence agencies will save billions. Shut down all the subsidies and special deals given big corporations. Then close all tax loopholes for the ultra wealthy and big corporations. Viola! Problem fixed.
So one rich guy pays $5,000,000 in taxes and some poor guy pays $53 bucksTypical con fallacy. The poor already pay a higher percentage of their income in ALL taxes than the rich.
Three of my grandparents died 59-72 one lived to 87Both my grandparents lived to 90+. My great-grandparents did the same.
But my father had one brother live to retirement and 3 siblings die in either infancy or childhood.
I actually think the age should be lowered to 60.SS and MC were started in 1934 and 1965 respectfully. In 1934 job were much more physical and people’s bodies broke down starting in their 50s. Nowadays go to any company and you see people working well into their 70s… heck even construction are less strenuous on the person’s body. The trend is only going to increase. In addition, medicine is getting better and people are living longer. This reality should be recognized.
In addition it is much easier to take care of oneself and eat better and feel better at older ages.
Our safety nets need to reflect this new reality.
Oh, this country is way beyond stupid.Only if we are stupid and forget how to do simple math.
Three of my grandparents died 59-72 one lived to 87
My dad died at 80 and my mom is in her 90s
Up until the 1950s, many children died in childbirth or from childhood diseases. With the development of Polio vaccine and measles/ smallpox eradication, children are surviving more. Mandatory car seats also help
Yes, we have cut down on the number of smokers, for sure. But the number of chemicals and inorganic substances we take in has skyrocketed.
As I showed above, 5.4 percent of the US population was over the age of 65 in the 1930s.![]()
Do we really live longer than our ancestors?
The wonders of modern medicine and nutrition make it easy to believe we enjoy longer lives than at any time in human history, but we may not be that special after all.www.bbc.com
I was thinking about this previously, and it is really an interesting question. That question being: has life span increased much or on average or more people making it to "the golden years".
As an example used on the article. If you have 2 people and 1 dies in the first year of life and one lives to 70, then the average life span for that population is 35 years.
In other words is the increase in average life span because we as a species are living longer (yes to a degree because of modern medicine), OR is the impact because of DECREASES in mortality of infants and the young, improved work place safety, improved medicine curing disease that in the past may have killed someone in their 20's.
Increasing average life span does not necessarily mean the species is living longer to a significant degree.
Interesting to ponder.
WW
Yes, absolutely. It was an accounting trick.And if the gov't had not "borrowed" from SS during the years there were huge surpluses, it would still be solvent.
And there is a point with that. A valid one.I actually think the age should be lowered to 60.
But what do we do for those folks who physically or mentally cannot continue working past current early retirement age?As I showed above, 5.4 percent of the US population was over the age of 65 in the 1930s.
Today, we are nearing 17 percent who are over 65.
We have tripled the percentage of people drawing Social Security.
That. Is. Unsustainable.
SS and MC were started in 1934 and 1965 respectfully. In 1934 job were much more physical and people’s bodies broke down starting in their 50s. Nowadays go to any company and you see people working well into their 70s… heck even construction are less strenuous on the person’s body. The trend is only going to increase. In addition, medicine is getting better and people are living longer. This reality should be recognized.
In addition it is much easier to take care of oneself and eat better and feel better at older ages.
Our safety nets need to reflect this new reality.
That is going to end.As I showed above, 5.4 percent of the US population was over the age of 65 in the 1930s.
Today, we are nearing 17 percent who are over 65.
We have tripled the percentage of people drawing Social Security.
That. Is. Unsustainable.
Three of my grandparents died 59-72 one lived to 87
My dad died at 80 and my mom is in her 90s
Up until the 1950s, many children died in childbirth or from childhood diseases. With the development of Polio vaccine and measles/ smallpox eradication, children are surviving more. Mandatory car seats also help
You are wrongExactly, increasing the "average life span". But not because people are living appreciably longer (as a species, not anecdotally), the bigger impact is because the average age of death of infants and young people is moving up - which mathematically impacts the "average life span" figure)
WW
But what do we do for those folks who physically or mentally cannot continue working past current early retirement age?
Well, yeah, but how do we essentially take money out of circulation. I think Gore had the better of the argument with W that we should have been allowed to place a small portion into individual, but select and govt approved funds.Yes, absolutely. It was an accounting trick.
Thus, Al Gore going on and on about putting SS in a "locked box".
Here's a simple test . What age are we saying that stealing is fine? At what age should it be legal for someone to just take your stuff? That should be the Social Security "retirement" age