I'm not an expert on what state (or national) vaccine laws are honestly; I'd have to research it sometime, not that I really care since I view sheer "paranoia" over vaccines, something which we only due a few times in our whole lifetimes; I'm just pointing out the reality of the research into the manufacturer defects and potential lawsuits it might generate, which is the reason we see so much nonsensical, anti-intellectual vaccine propaganda on the media today.
As far as idiots claiming this or that "should be done" in regards to something (e.x anti-vaxxers, or whatever); I'm honestly amused on that one, and am honestly pretty shocked at how many people don't even know the basics or the rudimentaries of their legal systems; such as probably not even knowing the differences between state or federal laws, British, American, or other Commonwealth (e.x. Canada or New Zealand) legal systems, civil or criminal procedure, or the actual differences in theory or practice between proposing a legal action, sanction, claiming an allegeded violation or whatever, and the actual time, energy, and requirements which it would take to actually carry out such an action to begin with. Or even the difference in theory and practice between the "law", as it would be if followed in theory, and the actual practice, in which people (whether suspects or law enforcement officers) don't, in real life always act "rationally" or follow in pure mathematical compliance with the law, whether they "should" or not.
Likely having nothing measuring or resembling even any rudimentary education on the "subjects" beyond something they saw on Judge Judy, or a silly crime TV show like CSI, which actual books by law and legal professionals have claimed are inaccurate, and distort public perceptions of the way which courts of law, trial,s evidence(s) and so forth work in real life. Or even something as basic and fundamental as reading up on the laws of their state or country, whether at a local library, a police department, or one of the many law books published by lawyers and legal professions and available for reading or purchasing online; whether the "law" itself, the philosoph(ies) behind it, or the various public, emotional, moral, or intellectual sentiments which go into making the law what it is, or deciding or determining what "should become" or "should" stay" law to begin with, or should be "made into law" if not already existing as such, statutes of limitations, and so forth, nor even under what domain one's own personal authority would grant or merit them in relation to making a claim or assertion, such as an accusation, likely false and not complaint to begin with the law, such as under the law regarding "defamation per se" (in which making the claim or assertion at all is automatically legally liable, with the claimer having to prove it true, not the person claimed against having to prove it "false"). Or something such as the difference between "calling the police", as in filing a complaint or report, and the claim or report being "valid", "true", and so on and so forth, and leading to an actual legitimate "arrest", the difference between a charge, an arrest, and a conviction, and so forth.
Hell, some idiots don't even know the difference between law; as state or federal law(s) which affect public life, or private or interpersonal contracts or negotiations, whether informal, such as with family members, friends, acquaintances, private - such as with social groups requiring a formal membership or other organizations (e.x. employers, schools, colleges, universities, doctors, marriages, courts, private websites, and their various private and non-legally binding rules, contracts, agreements, regulations, online vendors and so forth).
Much as there are thousands of laws ("major" or minor) in effect today, some of which have been around for ages, with the original reason for the law or rule being forgotten entirely, and not necessarily for the good, and as the average person isn't a judge, attorney, scholar, or legal enthusiast to begin with, it would more or less be mathematically impossible for a person to not have inadvertently broken some "minor" law at some point in their life without even knowing it (online forums being a wonderful example, as much of the demonstrated behavior would potentially not be protected in a court of law by the 1st Amendment, or by whatever speech laws exist within the context of the UK or the other Commonwealth nations nor even remotely in the realm of "legal" were a person stupid enough to say or do that in real life).
I was thinking of perusing some of the books on Barrister Books, in order to brush up on my law or legal scholarship, knowledge and philosophy.
Discount Law Books, New & Used Law School Textbooks and Study Guides | BarristerBooks.com: The Internet's Largest Law Bookstore
