Should Bolton be allowed to testify, and why?

[JoeB131]

Sure. The deep state and those fighting the deep state should all testify

You think the Deep State is a thing. That's adorable.

What you call the Deep State, I call the sensible professionals in the Military, Intelligence and Diplomatic Corps. The ones that sensible presidents listen to.

The hilarious thing about Trump and his supporters is that they feel the need to excuse his bad behavior, because they can't admit they made a mistake.

 

[Zorro!]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

i) If Bolton exonerates him, you'd call him a liar.
ii) If Bolton confirms that Trump thought Ukraine should investigate the Biden's nobody is going to remove him for that, even if they think such a thought was improper.
iii) Therefore, Bolton changes nothing.

 

[BULLDOG]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

i) If Bolton exonerates him, you'd call him a liar.
ii) If Bolton confirms that Trump thought Ukraine should investigate the Biden's nobody is going to remove him for that, even if they think such a thought was improper.
iii) Therefore, Bolton changes nothing.

What Bolton has to say will come out. you are cowards to block it from coming out now.

 

[Zorro!]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

i) If Bolton exonerates him, you'd call him a liar.
ii) If Bolton confirms that Trump thought Ukraine should investigate the Biden's nobody is going to remove him for that, even if they think such a thought was improper.
iii) Therefore, Bolton changes nothing.

What Bolton has to say will come out. you are cowards to block it from coming out now.

It's already been published in the Fake News New York Times, his book is due out soon, and any network would have him on for an interview for the asking.

So, how’s that whole impeachment thing working out for Democrats?

 

[JoeB131]

It's already been published in the Fake News New York Times, his book is due out soon, and any network would have him on for an interview for the asking.

So, how’s that whole impeachment thing working out for Democrats?

Uh, if Trump is barely winning Iowa, he's got problems.

Probably when those folks have figured out how bad his trade wars have screwed the farmers, he's got real problems.

 

[blackhawk]

If Bolton had anything revelant to say why didn't he say it long ago? Maybe he has relevant information maybe he doesn't but the fact we heard nothing about this till it was time for his book to be released makes the whole thing suspect in my view. Feels like this is more about book sales than anything else.

 

[lennypartiv]

I'm sure everybody who has written a book about Trump would love to testify at the impeachment trial in order to sell more books and make more money. Mitch ain't gonna let that happen.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

[

What Bolton has to say will come out. you are cowards to block it from coming out now.

You think Zorro had something to do with witnesses?

no wonder that you are a regressive.

 

[Zorro!]

If Bolton had anything revelant to say why didn't he say it long ago? Maybe he has relevant information maybe he doesn't but the fact we heard nothing about this till it was time for his book to be released makes the whole thing suspect in my view. Feels like this is more about book sales than anything else.

And about a Deep State War Monger wanting to plant a knife in Trump's back, which Benedict Romney was eager to facilitate.

WELL, THERE IS A CERTAIN LOGIC. SINCE HE WASN’T ACCUSED OF ANY REAL CRIME, THERE’S NO REAL CRIME TO ACQUIT HIM OF. ALL IS CLEAR. INSANE. MIRROR-WORLD INSANE. BUT CLEAR. AGAIN, WHAT DOES ONE HAVE TO DO OR SAY THESE DAYS TO BE DECLARED LEGALLY INSANE? OR WOULD IT PUT EVERY DEMOCRAT IN JAIL? Drunk and Desperate Explains Nancy’s Logic.

Hanging on to the podium for dear life, SanFranGran Nancy barely managed her dentures and false eyelashes, while ranting incoherently about fake trials and disbarring President Trump’s lawyers. Drunk? Is that a glass of vodka? Gin? We snark, you decide.

I mean, COME ON


POLITICO

✔@politico
· Jan 30, 2020

President Trump hasn’t been acquitted in the Senate trial yet, but Democratic leaders are already testing out their post-impeachment spinhttps://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/30/democrats-impeachment-trial-trump-acquittal-109490 …


Democrats seek to undermine Trump acquittal
“You cannot be acquitted if you don’t have a trial. You don’t have a trial if you don’t have witnesses and documentation and all of that,” Pelosi says.

politico.com
“Does the president know right from wrong? I don't think so" https://politi.co/2Oe2UB5

The harridan is cornered and she lashes out in the most outrageous ways.

“He will not be acquitted,” Pelosi insisted during her weekly news conference, according to Politico. “You cannot be acquitted if you don’t have a trial. You don’t have a trial if you don’t have witnesses and documentation and all of that. Does the president know right from wrong? I don’t think so.” …​

“I don’t know how they can retain their lawyer status, in the comments that they’re making,” Pelosi told reporters, according to The Hill. “I don’t think they made the case. I think they disgraced themselves terribly in terms of their violation of what our Constitution is about and what a president’s behavior should be.”​

If you’ve been following Impeachment Coverage, you realize what weird drunk logic Pelosi is trying to peddle here. After the Mueller debacle ended the fake Russian Collusion charges for good, House Democrats were desperate to file Impeachment articles on anything prior to Christmas — two articles that were not by any stretch of reasonable imagination High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Then Frisco’s favorite walking cadaver stuffed the paperwork inside her coat, put her thumb to her nose, wiggled her fingers at Mitch McConnell saying “Neener neener neener” and held them until January 10. Very serious person, our Nancy.

Deep State Democrats, including ostensible civil servants in the FBI and NSC/CIA, have been working overtime to Get Trump By Any Means Necessary since November 9, 2016. As the Pelosi-Schiff Circus folds its tent and slinks off into the sunset, will they have learned their lesson?

NO. This was just the latest battle in a larger war. Trump upset the Left’s long march to fundamentally changing America into a Euro-socialist, Beltway Command and Control not-America. They are still furiously working the Cancel Culture in the private and social sector. Drunk Nancy’s demands that Trump’s lawyers be disbarred for defending him is part and parcel of destroying people based on their beliefs and associations. Somewhere in hell Mao smiles.

Be vigilant. Be prepared. Be victorious!​

 

[B. Kidd]

Bolton got and will get paid any which way.

Trump's tweet that we'd be already in our 6th World War if he had listened to him, was classic!

 

[BULLDOG]

If Bolton had anything revelant to say why didn't he say it long ago? Maybe he has relevant information maybe he doesn't but the fact we heard nothing about this till it was time for his book to be released makes the whole thing suspect in my view. Feels like this is more about book sales than anything else.

I never agreed with Bolton, but I always believed he was honorable in his actions, even if he was wrong. Sadly, it looks like he does care more about book sales than the does about the country or the rule of law.

 

[MAGAman]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

About what?


Democrats refused to call him for the Ukrainian hoax.
..
What's the new hoax?

 

[BULLDOG]

[

What Bolton has to say will come out. you are cowards to block it from coming out now.

You think Zorro had something to do with witnesses?

no wonder that you are a regressive.

Of course Zorro had no more control over witnesses than I did, but the trump party, which he is part of, supports those that did.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

No. Schifferbrains should have called him in the House. Why didn't he? No do-overs in the Senate.

And the "Trump party' has not prevented anything since he hasn't even been under subpoena yet.

Your poll is based on lies. Shocker.

If the House called him, Executive Privilege would be claimed.

In the Senate, they can litigate that issue and we can hear from him.

The real problem is, Bolton knew exactly what was going on, and it had nothing to do with "corruption". It was a political hit, clear and simple.

If it wasn't, Trump would INSIST on his testimony.

More bullshit from the left wing butthurt losers.

 

[initforme]

I will believe every last word of Bolten over the Dems or gop. That's an easy one.

 

[Leo123]

Democrats already had their chance to call witnesses. They presented their case to the Senate who has no duty to allow these Democrat traitors to call more witnesses. Bolton is shilling a book and also may have classified information that should not be released. Time to shut this Democrat circus down.

 

[Crixus]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

Yes he should! He should be asked about what was said and what it was that he found so disturbing. Then he should be asked why he stated in an interview why, at that time two days later he told his interviewer the call was warm and cordial, but just a few days before his book is released it was inappropriate. Bolton should testify. If not infront of the senate, then infront of a committee.

 

[Leo123]

I will believe every last word of Bolten over the Dems or gop. That's an easy one.

Fine but the Democrats had every chance to call him during their impeachment inquisition, they did not and, in fact, Limited republican witnesses so, basically **** them and **** Bolton.

 

[Leo123]

Simple poll. Obviously Bolton has direct information that is relevant to the trial, but the Trump party is making great efforts to prevent that from happening. Depending on his testimony he could almost single-handedly exonerate the president. I'm particularly interested in why you think he should or shouldn't be allowed to testify.

Yes he should! He should be asked about what was said and what it was that he found so disturbing. Then he should be asked why he stated in an interview why, at that time two days later he told his interviewer the call was warm and cordial, but just a few days before his book is released it was inappropriate. Bolton should testify. If not infront of the senate, then infront of a committee.

That should have already been done at the House inquisition. Too late.

 

[Sun Devil 92]