JoeB131
Diamond Member
You didn't specify Public School. You just said "School". My school had the bible.Why are you comparing a religious school with a public school?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You didn't specify Public School. You just said "School". My school had the bible.Why are you comparing a religious school with a public school?
Nope.No, it doesn't.
It openly endorses genocide, rape, slavery, torture, and human sacrifice.
I didnt say "clown school" or "guitar school" either. I just assumed you would stick to the actual topic.You didn't specify Public School. You just said "School". My school had the bible.
“I put some lube on and got him on his knees, And I began to slide in from him from behind. I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated. He asked me to turn over while he slipped a condom on himself. This was my ass. And I was struggling to imagine someone inside me. He got on top and slowly inserted himself into me. It is the worst pain I think I have ever felt in my life. Eventually I felt a mix of pleasure with the pain.”Go right ahead find me anything that supports that premise?
You find the bible in ANY library. Ever read the damn thing?
As I said. It's a book about coming of age of a minority YOU don't like. It deals with subjects you don't like. Like being LGBTQ and the problems that entails.
Saying reading a book sexualizes kids is ridiculous. You guys all act like it takes a book to make teenagers interested in sex and sexuality. Are you guys kidding me?
This whole groomer thing is blatant culture war BS. It marginalizes an already marginalized group of people so you can demonize Democrats.
Can you point to a passage that offers play-by-play pornographic sexual deviance?Go right ahead find me anything that supports that premise?
You find the bible in ANY library. Ever read the damn thing?
You think Catholic Schools are the same as "Clown School"?I didnt say "clown school" or "guitar school" either. I just assumed you would stick to the actual topic.![]()
Because they can find much worse shit on line.“I put some lube on and got him on his knees, And I began to slide in from him from behind. I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated. He asked me to turn over while he slipped a condom on himself. This was my ass. And I was struggling to imagine someone inside me. He got on top and slowly inserted himself into me. It is the worst pain I think I have ever felt in my life. Eventually I felt a mix of pleasure with the pain.”
Explain why that should be in kid school libraries.
Go.
Sure. He's explaining that he had sex as a teenager. Something I can personally relate to although mine was from a heterosexual kind. As I said it's NOT meant for kids but for teenagers.“I put some lube on and got him on his knees, And I began to slide in from him from behind. I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated. He asked me to turn over while he slipped a condom on himself. This was my ass. And I was struggling to imagine someone inside me. He got on top and slowly inserted himself into me. It is the worst pain I think I have ever felt in my life. Eventually I felt a mix of pleasure with the pain.”
Explain why that should be in kid school libraries.
Go.
It’s perverted, disgusting smut in any context.Sure. He's explaining that he had sex as a teenager. Something I can personally relate to although mine was from a heterosexual kind. As I said it's NOT meant for kids but for teenagers.
As to why it belongs. Because it explains that having sex doesn't make you a pervert. Being queer doesn't make you a deviant. And being molested doesn't have to destroy you.
Now you tell me why those aren't lessons you should take to heart as a teen... Go.
That the best you can do?It’s perverted, disgusting smut in any context.
I’m not sure where your attraction to sexualizing children comes from, but it’s very creepy and disgusting to the rest of us.
Just because you may have perverted impulses doesn’t mean you have to try to normalize it to make yourself feel better.
But wow.. you’d be a bad parent or adult to have your child read this.
It is smut by any definition or context.That the best you can do?
I find it smut and you are a pervert and a bad parent?
I sure hope you don’t have her read or watch pornography. She can’t consent, you’d likely be harming her. Your job is to protect her innocence.Let me tell you Fricus. I have a daughter, she's 12.
If you embrace sexualizing kids to spite me.. well that’s on you, and the kids you’d be harming. It’d also be very immature, usually such rebelliousness leaves upon adulthood.If you think that makes me a bad parent. I have to say I don't give a flying fuck. In fact, your condemnation feels more like a badge of honor.
No, i think they are as different as catholic schools are to public schools. Are you catching on yet?You think Catholic Schools are the same as "Clown School"?
This is absolutely shocking.
Moms for Liberty has a problem with children being exposed to a book about rape and incest, and Joy Reid defends the book saying "Why should YOU get to decide what children should be able to read".
She then aggressively and constantly dissuades the issue while the Moms for Liberty rep continues to ask how rape, dildos, and incest are acceptable in a public school. Joy Reid says its about "context" (Harvard anyone?) and says "I'll answer your question" but then never does and continually interrupts and makes fallicy after fallicy.
You can disagree with people on policy, or even moral issues.. but Joy Reid is truly an evil individual here. She will not denounce a graphic, pornographic book about rape and incest, and instead attacks the people who speak against it and want it out of elementary/high school libraries.
Definitely shouts down and won’t address the key topic she’s trying to avoid.. which is a book that has pornography in it. Reid tried multiple fallacies..Joy Reid is a liberal bitch
She is badgering the guest and not allowing her to speak
Me sexualizing kids to spite you? My, my, don't we have an ego. I have news for you. In a bit I'm going home and I'll forget all about the anonymous bigot I've talked to. If you're lucky I might revisit the conversation. I might not. But of all the things life throws at me. Spiting you ranks very low.It is smut by any definition or context.
I sure hope you don’t have her read or watch pornography. She can’t consent, you’d likely be harming her. Your job is to protect her innocence.
If you embrace sexualizing kids to spite me.. well that’s on you, and the kids you’d be harming. It’d also be very immature, usually such rebelliousness leaves upon adulthood.
But yes, a parent who exposes their child to porn is a bad parent. If you do that and don’t like hearing that you’d be a bad parent, I’m sorry your feelings are hurt, but it wouldn’t change the fact that you’d be letting your child down and not protecting them.
Do better
If you say soMe sexualizing kids to spite you? My, my, don't we have an ego. I have news for you. In a bit I'm going home and I'll forget all about the anonymous bigot I've talked to. If your lucky I might revisit the conversation. I might not. But of all the things life throws at me. Spiting you ranks very low.
You can teach life lessons without involving having children read about erotic imagery of a penis being stuffed up someone’s ass and jacking off.As for exposing my kids to porn. My kid is 12. She knows what sex is without me exposing her to anything. She lives in the real world. That book is about real life and real issues.
But since she also knows that I'm honest with her when she asks me questions I have hope she'll come to me when the time does come and I'll give advice without condemnation. Maybe if she ends up being gay, I'll point her to that book, so she knows she doesn't have to feel ashamed.
The point is this. You can stick your head in the sand as deep as you want. You can try to raise your kid(s) to feel ashamed about sex and embarrassed by gayness.
You don't have the right to push that on me or my kid.
Mr. Friscus is speaking for all parents who are opposed to exposing children to porn in public schoolsMe sexualizing kids to spite you? My, my, don't we have an ego.
You don't have to explain the world to a teenager that way. I've bolded the word since you keep on using the word kid. This book is listed as young adult. But hey "kid" works better for you in this context right. It avoids the issue of having to acknowledge that this book is meant for people who can legally have consensual sex.If you say so
You can teach life lessons without involving having children read about erotic imagery of a penis being stuffed up someone’s ass and jacking off.
No, if you choose to do that.. to explain the world to a child this way… That makes you a pervert.
It isn't "porn" it's not meant to excite, he isn't writing it with that purpose. https://dictionary.findlaw.com/defi...ext=pornography n,is determined to be obscene.Mr. Friscus is speaking for all parents who are opposed to exposing children to porn in public schools
Libs are “for” anything MAGAs are against because it is personal with the left
Not true, but kids are afraid of teachers who will brow beat them if they do.It is banned from schools.
ExactlyBut the point of it is to explain and normalize the act of gay sex.