Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 64,594
- 46,906
- 3,565
You said that society did not always practice marriage and I showed whenBy using your argument against you and watching you flounder?
When cavemen roamed the earth
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You said that society did not always practice marriage and I showed whenBy using your argument against you and watching you flounder?
You didn't define primitive or stable. Through human history there have existed stable societies that had no concept of marriage and European societies that had marriage and constant wars and violent usurping of power. You don't have a real argument. You have the illusion of one so long as no one looks to closely.You said that society did not always practice marriage and I showed when
When cavemen roamed the earth
If you dont understand English I cant help you with thatYou didn't define primitive or stable. Through human history there have existed stable societies that had no concept of marriage and European societies that had marriage and constant wars and violent usurping of power. You don't have a real argument. You have the illusion of one so long as no one looks to closely.
It's quite obvious you have no intention of backing up what you say. Everything you've posted as "proof" has been soundly debunked, so you have nothing left but repetition.^ Posting without thinking.
Denying the epidemic of conservative grooming of children for rape via exposure to the Bible doesn't solve anything.
How do we stop Regroomercans/Groomservatives from raping the children?
The death penalty for those who promote the Bible - in schools and elsewhere - goes against everything decent people believe in, but is this what it will take to stop the child rape?
What do you think?
DO you think?
You can defend your argument without getting emotional. There's technologically primitive and then there's socially primitive. Were the Founders socially primitive for enslaving their own offspring that they had with their slaves? I think so.If you dont understand English I cant help you with that
No emotion just factYou can defend your argument without getting emotional.
Since you mention slaves let me point out that welfare has destroyed the black familyYou can defend your argument without getting emotional. There's technologically primitive and then there's socially primitive. Were the Founders socially primitive for enslaving their own offspring that they had with their slaves? I think so.
I don't really need you to point out your racism but thanks I guess.Since you mention slaves let me point out that welfare has destroyed the black family
Whites and blacks use drugs at the same rate you imbecile.....and the missing two parent family structure has led to increased drug use and crime
You mentioned black people first which by using your logic makes you the racistI don't really need you to point out your racism but thanks I guess.
Yet blacks have a higher percentage of bastard children than whites doI don't really need you to point out your racism but thanks I guess.
Whites and blacks use drugs at the same rate you imbecile.....
Mentioning black people isn't racist you moron but arguing that black families are destroyed and destroyed by being given too much is.Since you mention slaves let me point out that welfare has destroyed the black family
and the missing two parent family structure has led to increased drug use and crime
I don't have to. Not being married isn't the same at not caring for your kids.Yet blacks have a higher percentage of bastard children than whites do
How do you explain that?
They have s higher out-of-wedlock birth rate than they had before Johnson and the libs went ape-shit over the War on PovertyMentioning black people isn't racist you moron but arguing that black families are destroyed and destroyed by being given too much is.
And? Can you connect that fact to a rational point? I don't think so.They have s higher out-of-wedlock birth rate than they had before Johnson and the libs went ape-shit over the War on Poverty
A single mom with rotating boyfriends cant possibly care for her kids the way a mother with the biological father in the home canI don't have to. Not being married isn't the same at not caring for your kids.
I did connect, but it flew over your headAnd? Can you connect that fact to a rational point? I don't think so.
You're certainly attempting to make an argument but can quite get over the hump, can you?A single mom with rotating boyfriends cant possibly care for her kids the way a mother with the biological father in the home can
It didn't. Marriage is simply a legal construct, you want it to be a stand in for parental participation but it is not.I did connect, but it flew over your head
Your problem is that you're either insane or lying.Your problem is you advocate for adult-child consensual sexual relationships
Conservative Christians rape children in huge numbers, using the Bible as a primary grooming device.which faces significant hurdles to say the least so you attack conservatives on rape.
You've been driven insane by bigotry, ignorance and hate.I suspect access to innocent young boys was a major incentive for gays to become priests even if they did not believe in God
The same goes for the Boy Scouts who to be fair were forced by stupid lib judges to admit queers as scout masters and scout members
Homosexuals are a favorite pet minority who are important to the leftwing agends