Sexting...

[RadiomanATL]

Third Circuit Court of Appeals to decide whether children can be charged with possession of child pornography for having naked pictures of themselves

Appeals court to decide if 'sexting' is child porn

...we had to destroy the village to save it...

 

[Modbert]

It's like I told Blu earlier. Go to google.

Type in: "12 year olds"

Don't press enter, and look at what comes up as suggestions.

Oh, and for the record, I think this is a terrible idea. Going to bring in teenage girls on charges of being essentially sexual predators so they have that on their records.

 

[Baruch Menachem]

It's like I told Blu earlier. Go to google.

Type in: "12 year olds"

Don't press enter, and look at what comes up as suggestions.

Oh, and for the record, I think this is a terrible idea. Going to bring in teenage girls on charges of being essentially sexual predators so they have that on their records.

This kind of thing.

 

[Modbert]

This kind of thing.

What the fuck.

As a side note, he looks 10 and she looks in her 20's.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Third Circuit Court of Appeals to decide whether children can be charged with possession of child pornography for having naked pictures of themselves

Appeals court to decide if 'sexting' is child porn

...we had to destroy the village to save it...

Privileges with out responsibility .

 

[FA_Q2]

The concept that children are charged with child pornography for exploring their own sexuality is disgusting. This is a prime example of laws that were written of a different age. These laws were not written for a time when every teen has a phone with a camera in it and complete control over the destination of the flow of information on those cameras. Teens should NOT be charged for sexting.

On the other hand, I do not want the court to apply blanket immunity for teens either. That could lead to some very big loop holes for a heinous crime. There is a clear need for new laws that will uphold the intent of original child pornography laws and provide cover for ignorant young people.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Privileges with out responsibility .

Exactly.

 

[JD_2B]

Oh this is ridiculous. Two twelve year olds in their training bras, taking a "curiosity" picture together, and sending it to someone is NOT pornography. It is NOT sexual. Jesus, men need to get it together, if they are going to reduce a woman or child's breasts down to something that is there only for sexual entertainment. Do people FORGET that breasts are used to feed babies??? Or that the average 21 year old guy has larger "breasts" than a 12 year old girl, and YET he is allowed to expose that area of himself in public, to WOMEN even, nipples and all??!!

Even the 16 year old, who might have had a C cup, who fucking knows.. WAS JUST GETTING OUT OF THE SHOWER. Again, she had a towel wrapped around her waist, and only her breasts showed up in the pictures. They're BREASTS, not SEX ORGANS.
People need to stop making mosquito bites into mountains, and breasts into sex organs, is all I have to say. This is getting ridiculous.

 

[dilloduck]

Oh this is ridiculous. Two twelve year olds in their training bras, taking a "curiosity" picture together, and sending it to someone is NOT pornography. It is NOT sexual. Jesus, men need to get it together, if they are going to reduce a woman or child's breasts down to something that is there only for sexual entertainment. Do people FORGET that breasts are used to feed babies??? Or that the average 21 year old guy has larger "breasts" than a 12 year old girl, and YET he is allowed to expose that area of himself in public, to WOMEN even, nipples and all??!!

Even the 16 year old, who might have had a C cup, who fucking knows.. WAS JUST GETTING OUT OF THE SHOWER. Again, she had a towel wrapped around her waist, and only her breasts showed up in the pictures. They're BREASTS, not SEX ORGANS.
People need to stop making mosquito bites into mountains, and breasts into sex organs, is all I have to say. This is getting ridiculous.

They're BREASTS, not SEX ORGANS.

Amen----show us what you mean here JD !

 

[jillian]

there's also a difference (or there should be to sane people) between some 40 year old guy ogling a 12 year old's image on the net and a kid taking a picture of THEMSELVES...

Seems pretty pathetic.

 

[jillian]

there's also a difference (or there should be to sane people) between some 40 year old guy ogling a 12 year old's image on the net and a kid taking a picture of THEMSELVES...

Seems pretty pathetic.

 

[Conspiracist]

For the first time I have logged on to USMB I agree with Jillian. Way different circumstance between a man ogling a 12 yr old and a young teen ogling. I am not condoning teens sending these fuckin crazy nudies but I think it's something the parents should handle, not the gubmint.

 

[dilloduck]

For the first time I have logged on to USMB I agree with Jillian. Way different circumstance between a man ogling a 12 yr old and a young teen ogling. I am not condoning teens sending these fuckin crazy nudies but I think it's something the parents should handle, not the gubmint.

Classic example of a knee jerk law enacting without thinking about the consequences.
But make no mistake-----men are pure evil.

 

[jillian]

For the first time I have logged on to USMB I agree with Jillian. Way different circumstance between a man ogling a 12 yr old and a young teen ogling. I am not condoning teens sending these fuckin crazy nudies but I think it's something the parents should handle, not the gubmint.

Classic example of a knee jerk law enacting without thinking about the consequences.
But make no mistake-----men are pure evil.

well we know that, silly.

the problem is that here the girls are being designated sex offenders and purveyors of kiddke porn.

 

[dilloduck]

For the first time I have logged on to USMB I agree with Jillian. Way different circumstance between a man ogling a 12 yr old and a young teen ogling. I am not condoning teens sending these fuckin crazy nudies but I think it's something the parents should handle, not the gubmint.

Classic example of a knee jerk law enacting without thinking about the consequences.
But make no mistake-----men are pure evil.

well we know that, silly.

the problem is that here the girls are being designated sex offenders and purveyors of kiddke porn.

I bet there's a lawyer somewhere we can thank for that.
Free the nipples-hoorah JD !

 

[CrusaderFrank]

there's also a difference (or there should be to sane people) between some 40 year old guy ogling a 12 year old's image on the net and a kid taking a picture of THEMSELVES...

Seems pretty pathetic.

gotta give credit when due. good point

 

[jillian]

For the first time I have logged on to USMB I agree with Jillian. Way different circumstance between a man ogling a 12 yr old and a young teen ogling. I am not condoning teens sending these fuckin crazy nudies but I think it's something the parents should handle, not the gubmint.

 

[chanel]

But unfortunately, an 18 or 19 year old kid is considered an adult and HE can be charged even when the pic was unsolicited. There should be SOME consequence for the girl. I'm not sure what would be appropriate, but I am disgusted by people like JB who say "it's not sexual" and it's no big deal. It is a big deal. Reputations are ruined and the internet is forever. Making excuses will only make the problem worse.

 

[Modbert]

But unfortunately, an 18 or 19 year old kid is considered an adult and HE can be charged even when the pic was unsolicited. There should be SOME consequence for the girl. I'm not sure what would be appropriate, but I am disgusted by people like JB who say "it's not sexual" and it's no big deal. It is a big deal. Reputations are ruined and the internet is forever. Making excuses will only make the problem worse.

Think about this: 18 year old guy dating a 17 year old girl. Or 18 year old guy dating a 16 year old guy. Or 19 year old dating a 17 year old.

Point is, these are the sort of laws that can be abused easily because they are what I like to refer to as a "blanket law." Where those who make the laws have no real care to getting it right, just getting votes.

Other examples: Just about every law put on the books for the "War on Drugs."

 

[mudwhistle]

Oh this is ridiculous. Two twelve year olds in their training bras, taking a "curiosity" picture together, and sending it to someone is NOT pornography. It is NOT sexual. Jesus, men need to get it together, if they are going to reduce a woman or child's breasts down to something that is there only for sexual entertainment. Do people FORGET that breasts are used to feed babies??? Or that the average 21 year old guy has larger "breasts" than a 12 year old girl, and YET he is allowed to expose that area of himself in public, to WOMEN even, nipples and all??!!

Even the 16 year old, who might have had a C cup, who fucking knows.. WAS JUST GETTING OUT OF THE SHOWER. Again, she had a towel wrapped around her waist, and only her breasts showed up in the pictures. They're BREASTS, not SEX ORGANS.
People need to stop making mosquito bites into mountains, and breasts into sex organs, is all I have to say. This is getting ridiculous.

Excuse me if I'm being too forward.....if you think breasts aren't sexual...could you show me your tits????
.
[Just kidding]

I hope I've made my point hun.