MindWars
Diamond Member
- Oct 14, 2016
- 42,227
- 10,744
- 2,040
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
That's not to say it has to be human skin.There is nothing wrong with personal companion robots. They are better than people.
No and no, there is no replacement for a personal human companion, we are social animals we're meant to have human contact with each other.
There is something wrong socially with a person who would prefer to have a sexual relationship with a robot, there's psychological issues there.
No replacement for a personal human companion! Where have you been? People chucked off human companionship long ago. They use computers to converse, to play, they cuddle up with dogs or cats. Admittedly, this country is not as far down the road in rejecting human companions as is Japan but we will get there. Realistic robot sex partners is just the next step in social evolution.
There will never a substitution for skin on skin contact.
A robot would be far superior to a human. None of the downside. No personality quirks, never an argument.
Human are designed to need human to human interactions take it away completely and humans go a bit off hte deep end.
It doesn't happen yet because even going to a store gives human to human interactions.
This is just another way to desensitize the population and kids are getting the biggest impact of it than ever before.