Settlers Assault 60 Year Old Palestinian Judge

OMG, you really need to keep up.

The Goldstome Report alleged war crimes for both Hamas and the government in the West Bank.

Israel rejected the report.

When will you stop deflecting? We were discussing how you justify attacks on Israeli civilians

You do need to keep up. I already addressed that.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/israe...year-old-palestinian-judge-9.html#post7094918

Well at least you have the balls to admit that you consider all Israelis are legit targets. I've noticed that most pro - Palestinian terrorist supporters try to hide this belief.
 
José;7093027 said:
Originally posted by High_Gravity
Palestinian supporters need to be honest, to them even Tel Aviv is Palestinian land and full of settlers.

And damn right it is!!

Any city built in Palestine is necessarily part of the palestinian historical homeland no matter who built it... just like cities like NY and LA are part of the native american historical homeland even though they were both founded by whites.

And any state that denies the palestinian people's birthright to live there is by definition a racist state just like SA under apartheid.

You believe in the borders of 1948 (With Sherri thanking your post. She also supports the destruction of Israel, yet in another post she said she supports the 67' borders. yet she speaks of double standards).

That's not gonna happen. Tel Aviv is Israel.

Any "Palestine" will not be beyond 67' borders. Unless they wish for a very painful defeat.
 
Sderot is located in the Western Negev. The "occupied territories" are in the east and more up north. Big distance between the 'West Bank' and Sderot.

_44630322_israel_226_sderot_kibbutz.gif




Well, that will make it different than those who believe ALL Of Israel is "occupied":cuckoo::eusa_hand:

The 1949 armistice agreements, that Israel signed, call that Palestinian territory. Nobody has posted any documents showing when Israel legally acquired that land.

Look again at the map.
 
Well at least you have the balls to admit that you consider all Israelis are legit targets. I've noticed that most pro - Palestinian terrorist supporters try to hide this belief.
In the West Bank they are not considered "protected persons" according to international law.

I personally am against targeting them, but legally, they are not civilians.

In Israel proper, they are civilians and it would be a war crime to target them.

In the West Bank, they are not.
 
Loinboy, try and keep up. Mr Tinmore says that in Israel there are no civilians.

Not speaking at all of the west bank.

He claimed so many times, which is really, really, fucked up
 
That's BULLSHIT!

The entire Goldstone report is bullshit!

Goldstone admitted so himself!
No he didn't. All he said was he would have written some things differently if Israel had cooperated more, but all their findings still stand.

BTW, there were 3 other members of that committee and they haven't retracted a single word.

If Israel was innocent, they would have cooperated more.
 
Loinboy, try and keep up. Mr Tinmore says that in Israel there are no civilians.

Not speaking at all of the west bank.

He claimed so many times, which is really, really, fucked up
Well then I disagree with Tinny on that point.
 

omg, you really need to keep up.

The goldstome report alleged war crimes for both hamas and the government in the west bank.

Israel rejected the report.

when will you stop deflecting? We were discussing how you justify attacks on israeli civilians
easy peasy lemon squeezy

all but 6% of israelis live on stolen property and you are a thief supporter

so to return the stolen property when due process is denied by the thief supporters is justified AND ATTACK IS A PART OF THAT OF COURSE

but not violence because that just gives the jewish thieves the excuses they need to steal even more

and you support their thievery dont you
 
Last edited:
all but 6% of israelis live on stolen property

So you too, believe, Israel should be destroyed?

The most dangerous haters are leftist Jews

I have said that and I stand behind it.

Moisers.
 
so now i have to educate you ignorant wussy about the meaning of israel

it means..

the jewish people; only half of whom are thieves living in a stolen land

the other meaning is the stolen country you illegally occupy

thievery most sane huimans wish to destroy

the thief deserves compassion and due process and rehabilitation, especially because the stealing in 1948 was na result of the desperation after the shoah / holocaust

so i would wish to deprive you of your stolen land, your arrogance and paranoia and then wish you a better life as a non thief

no violence of any kind do i advocate..........................none and never
 
José;7093027 said:
Originally posted by High_Gravity
Palestinian supporters need to be honest, to them even Tel Aviv is Palestinian land and full of settlers.

And damn right it is!!

Any city built in Palestine is necessarily part of the palestinian historical homeland no matter who built it... just like cities like NY and LA are part of the native american historical homeland even though they were both founded by whites.

And any state that denies the palestinian people's birthright to live there is by definition a racist state just like SA under apartheid.

You believe in the borders of 1948 (With Sherri thanking your post. She also supports the destruction of Israel, yet in another post she said she supports the 67' borders. yet she speaks of double standards).

That's not gonna happen. Tel Aviv is Israel.

Any "Palestine" will not be beyond 67' borders. Unless they wish for a very painful defeat.

THE 2004 DECISION on the Wall does not address the issue of who has sovereignty rights in the lands Israel took by military conquest from 1947 to 1949 that were lands set aside as part of the Arab State in the Partition Plan. (THE ISSUE IS SOVEREIGNTY IN LANDS SEIZED IN 1947 to 1949 that were part of the lands set aside as an Arab State in the UN Partition Plan).It is simply not an issue discussed by the Court. WHEN Israel was admitted into the UN, she agreed she would honor the borders set in the UN Partition Plan and allow an Arab State to exist within those borders.
 
The 1949 armistice agreements, that Israel signed, call that Palestinian territory. Nobody has posted any documents showing when Israel legally acquired that land.

Look again at the map.

I have seen it. So? What I posted is true.
The 1949 armistice agreements, that Israel signed, call that Palestinian territory. Nobody has posted any documents showing when Israel legally acquired that land.

Most people believe that what is called Israel is Israel because that is what they have heard their whole life.That is not true. It is just say so. Nobody has posted any documents to back up that claim.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom