Seriously, what's wrong with Jon Huntsman?

[Neotrotsky]

The fact that you like him is sufficient cause for denying him the nomination.

He's a RINO who believes in the global warming hocus-pocus.

enough said.

He's a witch! BURN HIM!

Does he float?

Since he is full of the same stuff as Papa Obama
he must

 

[rightwinger]

Because the only experiment that will meet the conservatives stringent standards is.........Let's take a large vessel.......say the size of the earth, dump millions of pounds of hydrocarbons into it and see if there is any change

Anything less is insufficient

The fact that you can't perform a conclusive experiment does not give you license to make up facts from whole cloth. That's the methodology of religion, not science.

Thanks for proving my point

98% of scientists have reviewed the studies and consider them to be sufficient evidence

 

[Flopper]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

Huntsman has served in both Republican and Democrat administration. He knows more about the operation of government and foreign policy than all the Republican candidates combined plus he might be able to work with Democrats. That's certainly enough to disqualify him.

 

[rdean]

He's smart.

He believes in science.

He's educated.

He worked for Obama.

Four strikes and you're out.

 

[bripat9643]

Because the only experiment that will meet the conservatives stringent standards is.........Let's take a large vessel.......say the size of the earth, dump millions of pounds of hydrocarbons into it and see if there is any change

Anything less is insufficient

The fact that you can't perform a conclusive experiment does not give you license to make up facts from whole cloth. That's the methodology of religion, not science.

Thanks for proving my point

98% of scientists have reviewed the studies and consider them to be sufficient evidence

What point was that, your inability to commit logic?

I posted the evidence that your claim is a bald-faced lie in the thread about Climategate 2.0.

 

[bripat9643]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

Huntsman has served in both Republican and Democrat administration. He knows more about the operation of government and foreign policy than all the Republican candidates combined plus he might be able to work with Democrats. That's certainly enough to disqualify him.

Yes, "working with Democrats" is not what Republicans want. Defeating Democrats is what they want.

 

[Chris]

The fact that you can't perform a conclusive experiment does not give you license to make up facts from whole cloth. That's the methodology of religion, not science.

Thanks for proving my point

98% of scientists have reviewed the studies and consider them to be sufficient evidence

What point was that, your inability to commit logic?

I posted the evidence that your claim is a bald-faced lie in the thread about Climategate 2.0.

The experiment that proved CO2's effect on global warming was performed in 1859.

It's a fact.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

Because whack job anti-Semites like yourself do like him.... that's a clear indication there's something amiss.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Thanks for proving my point

98% of scientists have reviewed the studies and consider them to be sufficient evidence

What point was that, your inability to commit logic?

I posted the evidence that your claim is a bald-faced lie in the thread about Climategate 2.0.

The experiment that proved CO2's effect on global warming was performed in 1859.

It's a fact.

Ahhhh... the 1859 Chevy... what a great car!

 

[Stephanie]

I for the life of me don't know why Huntsman is even calling himself a Republican at this point. He gave up that right when he went to go work for Barry.

He’s what republicans once were: intelligent, pragmatic, non-ideologues who believed in responsible governance. The radical rightists who took over the Party about forty years ago are the aberration, the actual ‘RINOs,’ if you will.

So is Romney.

But unlike Huntsman, Romney is trying to come off as a rightwing extremist, needless to say it isn’t working.

Translation: He's a big government socialist.

Nonsense, there is no such thing. There are no ‘socialists’ running for president or who is currently president.

We want someone who will actually cut the size of government.

Who are ‘we’? Certainly not a majority of Americans and likely not a majority of republicans. You need to create a third party and run your fantasy candidate there; give the GOP back to true republicans like Huntsman and end this ‘National nightmare’ of rightwing extremism – it’s old, it’s boring, and a majority of Americans have had enough.

You people elected the most RADICAL leftest INEXPERIENCED JUNIOR SENATOR unbending IDIOLOUGE out there, who has shoved shit policy after shit policy down OUR THROATS against the will the will of the people, and YOU have the the nerve to talk about Republicans and Responsible Governance

 

[bripat9643]

The experiment that proved CO2's effect on global warming was performed in 1859.

It's a fact.

There is no such experiment. You can't do an experiment on the entire Earth.

 

[bripat9643]

You people elected the most RADICAL leftest INEXPERIENCED JUNIOR SENATOR unbending IDIOLOUGE out there, who has shoved shit policy after shit policy down OUR THROATS against the will the will of the people, and YOU have the the nerve to talk about Republicans and Responsible Governance

Just when you think you've heard the most absurd asinine statement possible from some leftwing turd in this forum, they will come out with something to top it.

 

[geauxtohell]

He's not willing to compromise his integrity and act nutty to appeal to the goofy-ass base that currently makes up what once was a political party that stood for something.

 

[westwall]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

The fact that you like him is sufficient cause for denying him the nomination.

He's a RINO who believes in the global warming hocus-pocus.

enough said.

So believing what nearly every credible scientist says is definitely happening makes one a RINO? THAT explains a lot.

enough said

No, only climatologists. And even they are lying and know it...





-How should we deal with flaws inside the climate community? I think,
that “our” reaction on the errors found in Mike Mann’s work were not
especially honest.



Dr. Douglas Maraun

 

[Neotrotsky]

He's not willing to compromise his integrity and act nutty to appeal to the goofy-ass base that currently makes up what once was a political party that stood for something.

one saves that kind of stuff for Papa Obama

 

[bripat9643]

He's not willing to compromise his integrity and act nutty to appeal to the goofy-ass base that currently makes up what once was a political party that stood for something.

Right, he's not willing to vote against socialism.

End of story.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Anybody see the NEW release of emails?

the guardian

what a right wing rag


See some of the quotes from non bias "scientists"

"Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous."​

"The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guide what's included and what is left out."​

"We're choosing the periods to show warming."​

"I doubt the modelling world will be able to get away with this much longer."​

Again, it the Left wants to believe it so bad
because one of the solutions is for more gov't

Just like with Papa Obama, no proof he could do anything
they just wanted to believe in Hope and Change

We see how well that worked out




AP: Climategate 2.0 emails 'appeared to show climate scientists talking in conspiratorial tones about ways to promote their agenda'

but, but it is "science"

Although their context couldn't be determined, the excerpts appeared to show climate scientists talking in conspiratorial tones about ways to promote their agenda and freeze out those they disagree with. There are several mentions of "the cause" and discussions of ways to shield emails from freedom of information requests.​

No doubt Newton had to do the same thing

 

[westwall]

Because the only experiment that will meet the conservatives stringent standards is.........Let's take a large vessel.......say the size of the earth, dump millions of pounds of hydrocarbons into it and see if there is any change

Anything less is insufficient

The fact that you can't perform a conclusive experiment does not give you license to make up facts from whole cloth. That's the methodology of religion, not science.

Thanks for proving my point

98% of scientists have reviewed the studies and consider them to be sufficient evidence

As evidenced by your abject failure with MTBE and the billions in environmental damage you caused to the state of California and the mass poisoning of THOUSANDS of water wells throughout the state....AFTER we warned you of the effects of MTBE, I would say our track record is ONE HELL OF A LOT BETTER THAN YOURS!

 

[geauxtohell]

He's not willing to compromise his integrity and act nutty to appeal to the goofy-ass base that currently makes up what once was a political party that stood for something.

Right, he's not willing to vote against socialism.

End of story.

Congratulations. You are the base.

 

[AVG-JOE]

Smith and Young weren't against each other...

Not sure what your point is here... I just point out that Huntsman's whole candidacy seems to be an animus against Romney. Which I have no problem with, Romney is such a loathesome, horrid creature that even other Mormons hate him.

I for the life of me don't know why Huntsman is even calling himself a Republican at this point. He gave up that right when he went to go work for Barry.

More than half my point was an attempt at warped humor - I recall some sort of rift between the followers of Brigham Young and those who followed Joseph Smith when the cult was in its formative years. I don't think it was quite the rift that the arms dealers for todays Sunnis and Shiites enjoy, but I do believe a rift exists.

That being said, I have no clue (nor do I care) if Huntsman or Romney have issues in that direction - I wanted the damn joke.

After Joseph Smith was killed, Brigham Young became leader of the main group of LDS. Smith's son, Joseph Smith III, attempted to claim leadership, but he was too young at the time. Another fellow named Strang formed an offshoot group, and after he was assassinated, Smith took leadership and formed the reorganized church of Jesus Christ and Latter Day Saints. It is today known as the Community of Christ Church. Other followers of Strang continued on with their own Church. IN addition to the Latter Day Saints cult that Romney and Huntsman belong to, there are a dozen or so offshoots.

The RCLDS stayed in IL, while the CJCLDS moved out to Utah and more hilarity ensued.

That said, I think that the animosity between the two men is personal and not theological. Both come from powerful Mormon families, and Huntsman probably wonders why he as a more accomplished governor, is putzing around at 1% while Romney is a sometimes frontrunner.

Good to know..... but was the joke funny?