Seriously cannot get over this disturbing 9/11 issue?

[SFC Ollie]

I think Fizz has already debunked the OP all that it needs.

As for the rest its all the same old BS.

Show me a recording that recorded the explosives going off that would have signaled this as controlled destruction we've all seen and heard the towers fall, we've all seen and HEARD an actual controlled demolition...

BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...

Haven't heard anything even remotely like a controlled demolition.

 

[creativedreams]

What I seriously cannot get over is the fact that the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.

Each building has many VERTICAL core columns that run from bedrock to the top floor. These core columns are fastened and welded together all the way up making them virtually one solid length of steel from bedrock to the top floor. They acted as if they did not even exist to provide hardly any resistance. Somehow the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it even though it had to work its way all the way down through all these VERTICAL support columns.

NONE of the debunking propaganda addresses the VERTICAL core columns and actually mislead by focusing on the horizontal floor trusses.

The VERTICAL core columns are the many tree trunks of the steel structured buildings and the HORIZONTAL trusses the debunking propaganda focuses on are the tree branches of the steel structured buildings.

How did our country evolve to get debunking propaganda to sway votes against new investigations....instead of just having a new investigation?

Even a Physicist for NASA for almost 40yrs is well documented as stating there is no doubt in his mind explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Center buildings. He spoke of how everything but the steel was pulverized into fine dust before it even hit the ground and of massive structural steel members being hurled horizontally for great distance.

 

[eots]

I think Fizz has already debunked the OP all that it needs.

As for the rest its all the same old BS.

Show me a recording that recorded the explosives going off that would have signaled this as controlled destruction we've all seen and heard the towers fall, we've all seen and HEARD an actual controlled demolition...

BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...

Haven't heard anything even remotely like a controlled demolition.

non-conventional explosives little Ollie...

 

[xotoxi]

I think Fizz has already debunked the OP all that it needs.

As for the rest its all the same old BS.

Show me a recording that recorded the explosives going off that would have signaled this as controlled destruction we've all seen and heard the towers fall, we've all seen and HEARD an actual controlled demolition...

BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...

Haven't heard anything even remotely like a controlled demolition.

non-conventional explosives little Ollie...

Or maybe MAGIC!!!

 

[manu1959]

I think Fizz has already debunked the OP all that it needs.

As for the rest its all the same old BS.

Show me a recording that recorded the explosives going off that would have signaled this as controlled destruction we've all seen and heard the towers fall, we've all seen and HEARD an actual controlled demolition...

BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...

Haven't heard anything even remotely like a controlled demolition.

non-conventional explosives little Ollie...

cool...how about the months of engineering and then the months of pre demo and then the months of setting charges....got any pithy comments on how that went down....

 

[xotoxi]

I think Fizz has already debunked the OP all that it needs.

As for the rest its all the same old BS.

Show me a recording that recorded the explosives going off that would have signaled this as controlled destruction we've all seen and heard the towers fall, we've all seen and HEARD an actual controlled demolition...

BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...

Haven't heard anything even remotely like a controlled demolition.

non-conventional explosives little Ollie...

cool...how about the months of engineering and then the months of pre demo and then the months of setting charges....got any pithy comments on how that went down....

MAGIC!!!!

(That's about as credible an idea as anything else he's said.)

 

[Liability]

I think Fizz has already debunked the OP all that it needs.

As for the rest its all the same old BS.

Show me a recording that recorded the explosives going off that would have signaled this as controlled destruction we've all seen and heard the towers fall, we've all seen and HEARD an actual controlled demolition...

BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...
BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG...BANG....BANG...BANG...BANG...

Haven't heard anything even remotely like a controlled demolition.

non-conventional explosives little Ollie...

id-eots cuts silent but deadly farts quite often, so he tends to be a real believer in silent bombs.

What a bunch of depraved soulless loons these Troofer scum tend to be.

 

[manu1959]

What I seriously cannot get over is the fact that the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.

Each building has many VERTICAL core columns that run from bedrock to the top floor. These core columns are fastened and welded together all the way up making them virtually one solid length of steel from bedrock to the top floor. They acted as if they did not even exist to provide hardly any resistance. Somehow the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it even though it had to work its way all the way down through all these VERTICAL support columns.

NONE of the debunking propaganda addresses the VERTICAL core columns and actually mislead by focusing on the horizontal floor trusses.

The VERTICAL core columns are the many tree trunks of the steel structured buildings and the HORIZONTAL trusses the debunking propaganda focuses on are the tree branches of the steel structured buildings.

How did our country evolve to get debunking propaganda to sway votes against new investigations....instead of just having a new investigation?

Even a Physicist for NASA for almost 40yrs is well documented as stating there is no doubt in his mind explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Center buildings. He spoke of how everything but the steel was pulverized into fine dust before it even hit the ground and of massive structural steel members being hurled horizontally for great distance.

which demolition firm did they use to bring down the building......

if i put a structural engineer in front of you from failure analysis with 40 years of forensic structural engineering that tells you your nasa boy is wrong.....

will you believe him?

 

[eots]

not if he works for protech controlled demolition inc the company responsible for the spoliation of the 9/11 crime scene and destruction of evidence

 

[DiveCon]

What I seriously cannot get over is the fact that the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.

Each building has many VERTICAL core columns that run from bedrock to the top floor. These core columns are fastened and welded together all the way up making them virtually one solid length of steel from bedrock to the top floor. They acted as if they did not even exist to provide hardly any resistance. Somehow the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it even though it had to work its way all the way down through all these VERTICAL support columns.

NONE of the debunking propaganda addresses the VERTICAL core columns and actually mislead by focusing on the horizontal floor trusses.

The VERTICAL core columns are the many tree trunks of the steel structured buildings and the HORIZONTAL trusses the debunking propaganda focuses on are the tree branches of the steel structured buildings.

How did our country evolve to get debunking propaganda to sway votes against new investigations....instead of just having a new investigation?

Even a Physicist for NASA for almost 40yrs is well documented as stating there is no doubt in his mind explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Center buildings. He spoke of how everything but the steel was pulverized into fine dust before it even hit the ground and of massive structural steel members being hurled horizontally for great distance.

which demolition firm did they use to bring down the building......

if i put a structural engineer in front of you from failure analysis with 40 years of forensic structural engineering that tells you your nasa boy is wrong.....

will you believe him?

did you notice he didnt NAME the NASA guy

 

[manu1959]

Even a Physicist for NASA for almost 40yrs is well documented as stating there is no doubt in his mind explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Center buildings. He spoke of how everything but the steel was pulverized into fine dust before it even hit the ground and of massive structural steel members being hurled horizontally for great distance.

which demolition firm did they use to bring down the building......

if i put a structural engineer in front of you from failure analysis with 40 years of forensic structural engineering that tells you your nasa boy is wrong.....

will you believe him?

did you notice he didnt NAME the NASA guy

probably the dude that was in charge of apollo 13 or the challenger i would guess.....

 

[DiveCon]

not if he works for protech controlled demolition inc the company responsible for the spoliation of the 9/11 crime scene and destruction of evidence

ROFLMAO
yea someone that was actually there wouldnt know

 

[manu1959]

not if he works for protech controlled demolition inc the company responsible for the spoliation of the 9/11 crime scene and destruction of evidence

ya we paid off an entire company to plan, rig, blow up and then clean up the wtc......

how long do you think it took to plan and rig that building.....

 

[eots]

Even a Physicist for NASA for almost 40yrs is well documented as stating there is no doubt in his mind explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Center buildings. He spoke of how everything but the steel was pulverized into fine dust before it even hit the ground and of massive structural steel members being hurled horizontally for great distance.

which demolition firm did they use to bring down the building......

if i put a structural engineer in front of you from failure analysis with 40 years of forensic structural engineering that tells you your nasa boy is wrong.....

will you believe him?

did you notice he didnt NAME the NASA guy

what a moron dive

Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:



"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,000 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition





Bio: NASA - Dryden Flight Research Center

Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:


"Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." AE911Truth

 

[manu1959]

which demolition firm did they use to bring down the building......

if i put a structural engineer in front of you from failure analysis with 40 years of forensic structural engineering that tells you your nasa boy is wrong.....

will you believe him?

did you notice he didnt NAME the NASA guy

what a moron dive

Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:



"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,000 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition





Bio: NASA - Dryden Flight Research Center

Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." AE911Truth

big deal....nasa never landed on the moon and two of their space ships blew up ..... the dude is full of shit....

 

[eots]

not if he works for protech controlled demolition inc the company responsible for the spoliation of the 9/11 crime scene and destruction of evidence

ya we paid off an entire company to plan, rig, blow up and then clean up the wtc......

how long do you think it took to plan and rig that building.....

So I take it were indeed going to cite protech...whats next popular mechanics ???

 

[eots]

did you notice he didnt NAME the NASA guy

what a moron dive

Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:



"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,000 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition





Bio: NASA - Dryden Flight Research Center

Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." AE911Truth

big deal....nasa never landed on the moon and two of their space ships blew up ..... the dude is full of shit....

right..you prefer the experts from popular mechanics...lol

 

[DiveCon]

what a moron dive

Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:



"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,000 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition





Bio: NASA - Dryden Flight Research Center

Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." AE911Truth

big deal....nasa never landed on the moon and two of their space ships blew up ..... the dude is full of shit....

right..you prefer the experts from popular mechanics...lol

since they actually use facts and are available to be questioned, yes, since yours are never around

 

[Fizz]

right..you prefer the experts from popular mechanics...lol

you prefer the experts from architects and engineers for 9/11 truth....

... like this guy?

User Profile

 

[BolshevikHunter]

Keeping up the good work Dive? LOL!!!! Hey, I gotta talk to you about next Season. I was wondering if we could change our Fantasy Football league from last year to a keeper League in the settings? E-mail or pm me. ~BH