Seriously cannot get over this disturbing 9/11 issue?

[DiveCon]

it started with the invasion of afganistain...remember..bin laden

but if the purpose was to invade Iraq, why not just make Saddam the scapegoat?
why put it on Al Qaeda when you had a ready villain available?

 

[Zona]

he really needs to seek out professional help before he becomes a danger to himself or others

you are on the one on psyc- medication divecon don't deny it

see ^^^ more TPP


troofer morons just LOVE acronyms

Birthers are just as bad.

 

[DiveCon]

you are on the one on psyc- medication divecon don't deny it

see ^^^ more TPP


troofer morons just LOVE acronyms

Birthers are just as bad.

agreed, both want to suspend rational thought and reject facts
but you are in that same boat on other things


btw, i began calling "birthers" birfers, because they don't really want the facts of his birth

 

[eots]

it started with the invasion of afganistain...remember..bin laden

but if the purpose was to invade Iraq, why not just make Saddam the scapegoat?
why put it on Al Qaeda when you had a ready villain available?

because Saddam was a leader of a country. not a known terrorist.what was needed was a shadowy elusive enemy not tied to any sovereign nation

 

[eots]

see ^^^ more TPP


troofer morons just LOVE acronyms

Birthers are just as bad.

btw, i began calling "birthers" birfers, because they don't really want the facts of his birth

well thats just stupid...unlike troofer however it is actually stupid enough I believe you did indeed coin that one

 

[DiveCon]

Birthers are just as bad.

btw, i began calling "birthers" birfers, because they don't really want the facts of his birth

well thats just stupid...unlike troofer however it is actually stupid enough I believe you did indeed coin that one

and for the same reasons
troofer dont actually care about the truth

 

[DiveCon]

it started with the invasion of afganistain...remember..bin laden

but if the purpose was to invade Iraq, why not just make Saddam the scapegoat?
why put it on Al Qaeda when you had a ready villain available?

because Saddam was a leader of a country. not a known terrorist.what was needed was a shadowy elusive enemy not tied to any sovereign nation

he was a known terrorist supporter
it wouldnt have been hard to make the connection, and since they didnt actually attempt that connection, but many people still believe there WAS a connection, how hard do you really think it would have been to do?????
this is why troofers are such fucking morons

 

[eots]

but if the purpose was to invade Iraq, why not just make Saddam the scapegoat?
why put it on Al Qaeda when you had a ready villain available?

because Saddam was a leader of a country. not a known terrorist.what was needed was a shadowy elusive enemy not tied to any sovereign nation

he was a known terrorist supporter
it wouldnt have been hard to make the connection, and since they didnt actually attempt that connection, but many people still believe there WAS a connection, how hard do you really think it would have been to do?????
this is why troofers are such fucking morons

really and what acts of terrorism was Saddam wanted for ?

 

[Fizz]

it started with the invasion of afganistain...remember..bin laden

but if the purpose was to invade Iraq, why not just make Saddam the scapegoat?
why put it on Al Qaeda when you had a ready villain available?

because Saddam was a leader of a country. not a known terrorist.what was needed was a shadowy elusive enemy not tied to any sovereign nation

thats the biggest pile of shit i have ever heard...

here's an example....
In 1993, the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) directed and pursued an attempt to assassinate, through the use of a powerful car bomb, former U.S. President George Bush and the Emir of Kuwait. Kuwaiti authorities thwarted the terrorist plot and arrested 16 suspects, led by two Iraqi nationals.
http://www.c-span.org/Content/PDF/iraqdecade.pdf

 

[DiveCon]

because Saddam was a leader of a country. not a known terrorist.what was needed was a shadowy elusive enemy not tied to any sovereign nation

he was a known terrorist supporter
it wouldnt have been hard to make the connection, and since they didnt actually attempt that connection, but many people still believe there WAS a connection, how hard do you really think it would have been to do?????
this is why troofers are such fucking morons

really and what acts of terrorism was Saddam wanted for ?

more proof that troofers are complete fucking MORONS

 

[eots]

he was a known terrorist supporter
it wouldnt have been hard to make the connection, and since they didnt actually attempt that connection, but many people still believe there WAS a connection, how hard do you really think it would have been to do?????
this is why troofers are such fucking morons

really and what acts of terrorism was Saddam wanted for ?

more proof that troofers are complete fucking MORONS

this is your answer ?...so was I just debwunked ?

 

[Fizz]

really and what acts of terrorism was Saddam wanted for ?

more proof that troofers are complete fucking MORONS

this is your answer ?...so was I just debwunked ?

yea jackass. scroll up a few posts

 

[DiveCon]

really and what acts of terrorism was Saddam wanted for ?

more proof that troofers are complete fucking MORONS

this is your answer ?...so was I just debwunked ?

still MORE proof that troofers are complete fucking MORONS

 

[DiveCon]

more proof that troofers are complete fucking MORONS

this is your answer ?...so was I just debwunked ?

yea jackass. scroll up a few posts

no sense giving that fuckwad actual proof

 

[elvis]

if saddam had been scapegoated for 9/11, 90 percent of the country would still support the war in iraq.

 

[DiveCon]

if saddam had been scapegoated for 9/11, 90 percent of the country would still support the war in iraq.

yeah, they wanted to invade Iraq, so they blew up the WTC, the pentagon, and an empty field in PA
yet didnt pin the deed on the man they wanted to get

whats wrong with that picture

 

[eots]

if saddam had been scapegoated for 9/11, 90 percent of the country would still support the war in iraq.

yeah, they wanted to invade Iraq, so they blew up the WTC, the pentagon, and an empty field in PA
yet didnt pin the deed on the man they wanted to get

whats wrong with that picture

They wanted to invade Iraq and Afghanistan and create a shadowy enemy that could strike domestically at anytime ,,exploited the bin laden all-cia-duh Bogey man and lied about WMDs

 

[eots]

but if the purpose was to invade Iraq, why not just make Saddam the scapegoat?
why put it on Al Qaeda when you had a ready villain available?

because Saddam was a leader of a country. not a known terrorist.what was needed was a shadowy elusive enemy not tied to any sovereign nation

thats the biggest pile of shit i have ever heard...

here's an example....
In 1993, the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) directed and pursued an attempt to assassinate, through the use of a powerful car bomb, former U.S. President George Bush and the Emir of Kuwait. Kuwaiti authorities thwarted the terrorist plot and arrested 16 suspects, led by two Iraqi nationals.
http://www.c-span.org/Content/PDF/iraqdecade.pdf

what led by two Iraqis and 14 Arabs ..what about the 9/11 hijackers where were they from ?...dont pretend it makes sense

 

[DiveCon]

if saddam had been scapegoated for 9/11, 90 percent of the country would still support the war in iraq.

yeah, they wanted to invade Iraq, so they blew up the WTC, the pentagon, and an empty field in PA
yet didnt pin the deed on the man they wanted to get

whats wrong with that picture

They wanted to invade Iraq and Afghanistan and create a shadowy enemy that could strike domestically at anytime ,,exploited the bin laden all-cia-duh Bogey man and lied about WMDs

LOL yeah, the SAME people that "pulled off 9/11" lied about WMD and had no contingency for WMD to be found

ROFLMAO

 

[DiveCon]

because Saddam was a leader of a country. not a known terrorist.what was needed was a shadowy elusive enemy not tied to any sovereign nation

thats the biggest pile of shit i have ever heard...

here's an example....
In 1993, the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) directed and pursued an attempt to assassinate, through the use of a powerful car bomb, former U.S. President George Bush and the Emir of Kuwait. Kuwaiti authorities thwarted the terrorist plot and arrested 16 suspects, led by two Iraqi nationals.
http://www.c-span.org/Content/PDF/iraqdecade.pdf

what led by two Iraqis and 14 Arabs ..what about the 9/11 hijackers where were they from ?...dont pretend it makes sense

uh, most Iraqis ARE arabs
the only ones that arent are the Kurdish