- Aug 23, 2009
- 22,802
- 10,704
- 950
What a royal clusterfuck of an administration this is turning out to be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong. It's OUR government and we pay people to do a job, not work against it.It's my government, staying informed is part of my civic responsibility.
What's your inside sources say?I'm glad he plugged one leak.
He didn't "plug a leak", he fired a guy for saying mean things about him.
What's your inside sources say?I'm glad he plugged one leak.
He didn't "plug a leak", he fired a guy for saying mean things about him.
Oddly, it doesn't match your comment. It says:What's your inside sources say?I'm glad he plugged one leak.
He didn't "plug a leak", he fired a guy for saying mean things about him.
I don't have any "inside sources" in the Trump White House.
My "source" is the article in the OP.
Staying informed only works against the government when it is trying to deceive.Wrong. It's OUR government and we pay people to do a job, not work against it.It's my government, staying informed is part of my civic responsibility.
Oddly, it doesn't match your comment. It says:What's your inside sources say?I'm glad he plugged one leak.
He didn't "plug a leak", he fired a guy for saying mean things about him.
I don't have any "inside sources" in the Trump White House.
My "source" is the article in the OP.
"According to one person who attended the discussion, Deare slammed the Trump administration for its policies on Latin America, specifically its rocky start to relations with Mexico."
Propaganda isn't the kind of information I want. But you missed the point (as usual). We are not paying them to operate against the government we put in office. It's illegal for a reason. Those are OUR laws, not YOURS to casually dismiss for political gain.Staying informed only works against the government when it is trying to deceive.Wrong. It's OUR government and we pay people to do a job, not work against it.It's my government, staying informed is part of my civic responsibility.
Word definition. He was critical of Trump's policies, you said he was canned for saying mean things about Trump. I can't tell if you are jerking me around or not.Oddly, it doesn't match your comment. It says:What's your inside sources say?I'm glad he plugged one leak.
He didn't "plug a leak", he fired a guy for saying mean things about him.
I don't have any "inside sources" in the Trump White House.
My "source" is the article in the OP.
"According to one person who attended the discussion, Deare slammed the Trump administration for its policies on Latin America, specifically its rocky start to relations with Mexico."
How does that "not match" my comment?
Who is them? What is illegal? What laws am I dismissing for political gain?Propaganda isn't the kind of information I want. But you missed the point (as usual). We are not paying them to operate against the government we put in office. It's illegal for a reason. Those are OUR laws, not YOURS to casually dismiss for political gain.
You're stupid then. I don't have a coloring book version for you.Who is them? What is illegal? What laws am I dismissing for political gain?Propaganda isn't the kind of information I want. But you missed the point (as usual). We are not paying them to operate against the government we put in office. It's illegal for a reason. Those are OUR laws, not YOURS to casually dismiss for political gain.
If I am missing your point it is not intentional. I need you to elaborate, you're incoherent.
He's just another obama troll that wants this country to fail.Word definition. He was critical of Trump's policies, you said he was canned for saying mean things about Trump. I can't tell if you are jerking me around or not.Oddly, it doesn't match your comment. It says:What's your inside sources say?
He didn't "plug a leak", he fired a guy for saying mean things about him.
I don't have any "inside sources" in the Trump White House.
My "source" is the article in the OP.
"According to one person who attended the discussion, Deare slammed the Trump administration for its policies on Latin America, specifically its rocky start to relations with Mexico."
How does that "not match" my comment?