Senior Hamas Official Mousa Abu Marzouk: Nobody Could Have Anticipated The Consequences Of October 7

Not "entirely". Just such a high proportion that Hamas enjoys support and cover from the very people they are using as human shields.

Thought experiment for you:

A terrorist holes up with a suitcase nuke in a mall and surrounds himself with 300 hostages.

Law enforcement sends in a robot with a nice sized bomb and blows the terrorist, his now disabled nuke, and the hostages into a pink mist.

Whose hands is the blood of the dead hostages on?
I suspect it would be debatable ad infinitum.
 
It's not a retaliation, it's a complete change of Israeli policy. For years, Netanyahu talked about "quiet for quiet," and sought to makes deals with Hamas to keep the conflict at a low level, but the savagery of the Oct. 7 attack persuaded him that "quiet for quiet" was a failed policy, and that Israel had to make sure Hamas no longer had the capability to launch large scale attacks on Israel. There is very little dissent among Israelis on this change of policy, but it is unlikely any other Israeli leader would have been able to stand up to US pressure as well as Netanyahu has.
Its not retaliation that’s true. ITS GENOCIDE.
 
No the Bloodthursty Arabs

Can you define bloodthirsty? It appears you don’t know what it means, when clearly tens of thousands of innocent Palis have been murdered and maimed, and their homes destroyed. Now compare that to what Palestinians have done to Israel.

THINK!

SHUT OFF THE TV.
 
Can you define bloodthirsty? It appears you don’t know what it means, when clearly tens of thousands of innocent Palis have been murdered and maimed, and their homes destroyed. Now compare that to what Palestinians have done to Israel.

THINK!

SHUT OFF THE TV.
Killing 300 Concert Goers in less than 3 hours
 

Senior Hamas Official Mousa Abu Marzouk: Nobody Could Have Anticipated The Consequences Of October 7; We Did Not Expect A Barbaric World War against Us, In Violation Of International Law



Interviewer:
"When the [Izz Al-Din Al-Qassam] Brigades did what they did on October 7, did they have expectations regarding the consequences of that attack?"
Mousa Abu Marzouk:
"Look, the consequences of the attack... Nobody in the whole world expected them to be so barbaric, and in such violation of all the international laws, treaties and norms. Nobody expected the [Israeli response] to be so barbaric, because, ultimately, the resistance fights soldiers. It is not fighting civilians with planes and tanks."
Interviewer:
"What would you do if you had expected these consequences?"
Abu Marzouk:
"Nobody expected that all the Western powers, The U.S., and Britain, would wage world war against civilians. Nobody expected that.



Commentary:
Hust what did Mousa Abu Marzouk expect after the October 7th surprise attack?
I guess that Mousa Abu Marzouk was under the impression that Israel would roll over and allow the barbaric attack to take place and not retaliate.
The result of Marzouk's decision to attack was the massacre women and children. Yes, Hamas crossed the line and now they get to live with the consequences. Now they Pay the Piper
Hamas broke a ceasefire, committed atrocities, acted like a bunch of barbarians and now Marzouk leads with the victim card. Not buying it. This is what you wanted. You sowed the whirlwind.
For the record:
To the citizens in Gaza who today suffer. They do so because they did nothing to stop October 7 from happening. Now they have to suffer the consequences along with those who carried out the slaughters.
Bo one spoke up. Many people had to have been privy to the preparations. No doubt, many of those tight-lipped people thought the Israelis were going to “get theirs”. Well, someone is “getting theirs”, and it isn’t the Israelis.
In the meantime, the friends of Hamas, namely Hezbollah had done little to nothing in assistance to Hamas.
Jordan and Egypt refuse to accept Palestinian refugees. Even Syria and Iran have refused to accept Palestinians.
Hamas didn't think the IDF would make Gaza into a moonscape? LOL

That doesn't make the IDF any less than a criminal enterprise at this point (they just shot and killed 100 people rioting for FOOD). But Israel assassinated everyone Pale involved in Munich 72. Israel demolished Pale refugee camps in Lebanon .... with people dying inside them.

Hamas tried to stop the move for recognition of Israel. MbS ain't helping then. That's what Hamas didn't expect.

Why Biden bent over to be Bibi's bitch boy .... well, Biden's old and probably too late to notice he's senile.
 
Can you define bloodthirsty? It appears you don’t know what it means, when clearly tens of thousands of innocent Palis have been murdered and maimed, and their homes destroyed. Now compare that to what Palestinians have done to Israel.

THINK!

SHUT OFF THE TV.
I don't see any way to gauge "proportionality." I doubt Japan envisioned being bombed twice with nukes.

Israel made it clear that if Hamas wants the carnage to end, they need to return the hostages, but it's probably too late. What makes Likud's (and all of Israel's) objectives clear is that they simply have little interest in a permaent ceasefire. And why would they. The US is happy to let the zionists have all of the WB and Gaza.

The only legit interest Israel has (besides it's hostages and killing every Palestinian involved in the terrorist attack) is simply a permanent cease fire. IF THAT was Israel's objective, they wouldn't be murdering civilians in the West Bank. That's what makes them bloodthirsty rejects, the same as the Pales. It's no coincidence that no other country wants either of these two pre-Jesus tribes.
 
I don't see any way to gauge "proportionality." I doubt Japan envisioned being bombed twice with nukes.

Israel made it clear that if Hamas wants the carnage to end, they need to return the hostages, but it's probably too late. What makes Likud's (and all of Israel's) objectives clear is that they simply have little interest in a permaent ceasefire. And why would they. The US is happy to let the zionists have all of the WB and Gaza.

The only legit interest Israel has (besides it's hostages and killing every Palestinian involved in the terrorist attack) is simply a permanent cease fire. IF THAT was Israel's objective, they wouldn't be murdering civilians in the West Bank. That's what makes them bloodthirsty rejects, the same as the Pales. It's no coincidence that no other country wants either of these two pre-Jesus tribes.
If Israel had an interest in returning the hostages, they wouldn’t have carpet bombed Gaza. They likely killed most if not all the hostages, but will blame the Palestinians for their murder.

We do know for certain the IDF assassinated some hostages who where screaming in Hebrew carrying a white flag, prior to their being murdered.
 
Bibi has literally used Hamas's idiotic barbarity to claim title to all of the WB. That's what Israel wants. My only question is whether Hamas expected it. And imo they did. Hamas wanted to blow up (pun intended) any peace process that would lead to a Pale state willing to live in peace.
 

Senior Hamas Official Mousa Abu Marzouk: Nobody Could Have Anticipated The Consequences Of October 7; We Did Not Expect A Barbaric World War against Us, In Violation Of International Law



Interviewer:
"When the [Izz Al-Din Al-Qassam] Brigades did what they did on October 7, did they have expectations regarding the consequences of that attack?"
Mousa Abu Marzouk:
"Look, the consequences of the attack... Nobody in the whole world expected them to be so barbaric, and in such violation of all the international laws, treaties and norms. Nobody expected the [Israeli response] to be so barbaric, because, ultimately, the resistance fights soldiers. It is not fighting civilians with planes and tanks."
Interviewer:
"What would you do if you had expected these consequences?"
Abu Marzouk:
"Nobody expected that all the Western powers, The U.S., and Britain, would wage world war against civilians. Nobody expected that.



Commentary:
Hust what did Mousa Abu Marzouk expect after the October 7th surprise attack?
I guess that Mousa Abu Marzouk was under the impression that Israel would roll over and allow the barbaric attack to take place and not retaliate.
The result of Marzouk's decision to attack was the massacre women and children. Yes, Hamas crossed the line and now they get to live with the consequences. Now they Pay the Piper
Hamas broke a ceasefire, committed atrocities, acted like a bunch of barbarians and now Marzouk leads with the victim card. Not buying it. This is what you wanted. You sowed the whirlwind.
For the record:
To the citizens in Gaza who today suffer. They do so because they did nothing to stop October 7 from happening. Now they have to suffer the consequences along with those who carried out the slaughters.
Bo one spoke up. Many people had to have been privy to the preparations. No doubt, many of those tight-lipped people thought the Israelis were going to “get theirs”. Well, someone is “getting theirs”, and it isn’t the Israelis.
In the meantime, the friends of Hamas, namely Hezbollah had done little to nothing in assistance to Hamas.
Jordan and Egypt refuse to accept Palestinian refugees. Even Syria and Iran have refused to accept Palestinians.
You Hamas a$$hole$ brought this down upon your own heads.

October 7th had consequences.

These are yours.

Enjoy.

And... while we're at it... rot in Hell, you Islamist terrorist scumbags.


Death to Hamas.

Go Team Israel.
 

Forum List

Back
Top