Senate coming after handguns

[SniperFire]

Progressive totalitarians have been predictable throughout history.



SENATE TO GO FOR HANDGUNS

Assault Weapons - Issues - United States Senator Dianne Feinstein

 

[deltex1]

How about matches????

Sleeping Woman Set on Fire Outside Van Nuys Store

 

[emptystep]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

 

[Katzndogz]

The government won't stop until only the criminals have weapons.

 

[SniperFire]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Tell that to the Obamites who commit most all the murders.

 

[martybegan]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

 

[SniperFire]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

The Senate bill actually grandfathers registration.

Assault Weapons - Issues - United States Senator Dianne Feinstein

Stalinists.

 

[emptystep]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

First let's break this into chewable pieces. Do you think that the guns which are allowed does not provide enough firepower for you? If so which one(s) would you like added?

 

[martybegan]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

The Senate bill actually grandfathers registration.

Assault Weapons - Issues - United States Senator Dianne Feinstein

Stalinists.

Oh, and I forgot the other pesky thing...

Because it is not consitutional, this is not regulation, this is prohbition wrapped in the false mantle of regulation.

 

[SniperFire]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

First let's break this into chewable pieces. Do you think that the guns which are allowed does not provide enough firepower for you? If so which one(s) would you like added?

Fortunately, this is not your call, Libpuke.

 

[emptystep]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

Do you think we are incapable of trying to solve multiple problems at the same time?

 

[SniperFire]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

Do you think we are incapable of trying to solve multiple problems at the same time?

I think you are incapable of walking and chewing gum at the same time.

 

[emptystep]

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

First let's break this into chewable pieces. Do you think that the guns which are allowed does not provide enough firepower for you? If so which one(s) would you like added?

Fortunately, this is not your call, Libpuke.

I like your answer because it basically, well, avoids the question all together. Will you be replying to all my questions in a similar manner?

 

[emptystep]

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

Do you think we are incapable of trying to solve multiple problems at the same time?

I think you are incapable of walking and chewing gum at the same time.

See previous post.

 

[Missourian]

You should all read Heller.

This isn't going anywhere.

 

[hazlnut]

Progressive totalitarians have been predictable throughout history.



SENATE TO GO FOR HANDGUNS

Assault Weapons - Issues - United States Senator Dianne Feinstein

You'll be defenseless against the Village People.

 

[martybegan]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

Do you think we are incapable of trying to solve multiple problems at the same time?

No, I think gungrabber Fienstien's solution is idiotic nonsense.

And it gives lie to the usual gungrabber statement that "we dont want to take your guns"

 

[Katzndogz]

Of course it will go somewhere. You just might not like where it's going.

 

[emptystep]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

If we work on drying up certain types of gun domestically then more such guns will have to be smuggled across the border. If this becomes a problem than we will need to address that issue. (It is a different nature than drug trafficking so please don't use that as a comparison.)

 

[martybegan]

Hell yeah! About damn time! What exactly in that proposal do you have a problem with. It still leaves enough firepower for you grown children to shred a deer before it hits the ground.

QUIT SHOOTING OUR CHILDREN!!!

Because it creates two classes of people, those smart enough to buy the guns before the ban, and those who couldnt or didnt.

Because it does nothing to address the problem of criminals using guns.

Because it is classic overreach. First assualt rifles were the problem, but lets lump in handguns and shotguns because we can't let 20 dead kids go to waste.

Because it unduly burdens law abiding gun owners.

Because it will do nothing to prevent mass murders, regular murder, et al.

If we work on drying up certain types of gun domestically then more such guns will have to be smuggled across the border. If this becomes a problem than we will need to address that issue. (It is a different nature than drug trafficking so please don't use that as a comparison.)

Still doesnt answer my questions.

So in the end a total gun ban is what you want, and that makes you a facist gungrabbing fucktard.