SCOTUS says keep punishing the Rs for cheating

[Yurt]

is the 13th thread you've created on this?

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

you have no credibility. you completely ignore democratic voter fraud. you're a worthless hack.

 

[Truthmatters]

and look at them pretend a SCOTUS decision means nothing?


they have gone bat shit crazy

 

[R.D.]

dear fucking idiot,


you are too stupid to understand this debate so fuck you very much

The first paragraph in your link states the facts...


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

From there it further goes on to explain why you are misunderstanding the issue

 

[Truthmatters]

For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”

The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.




Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times


these are facts no matter how many silly names you call me and how much you lie about these facts

 

[Truthmatters]

dear fucking idiot,


you are too stupid to understand this debate so fuck you very much

The first paragraph in your link states the facts...


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

From there it further goes on to explain why you are misunderstanding the issue

No it doesn't you fucking liar

 

[Truthmatters]

what the hell do you think lying about it gains you?

 

[BorisTheAnimal]

Should have known Desh, the uberhyperpartisan twat is crapflooding this forum.

 

[BorisTheAnimal]

Good old Desh, the whore for the DNC who thinks Democrats alone are clean and pure as the wind driven snow, And who probably has been spamming these faux fraud threads ever since the SCOTUS put the kibosh on AlGore and Co. in 2000.

 

[Truthmatters]

trying to make you bat shit crazy fools accept SCOTUS decisions makes me crazy?


what the fuck dudes you are making idiots out of yourselves.

do you think you are gaining voters this way?

 

[Truthmatters]

SCOTUS decision asshole


they are real

 

[Truthmatters]

on what basis do you claim its not real?

 

[BorisTheAnimal]

The problem with Liberals is that they are constantly pissed off about everything. but the shellacking of 1994 is what really pushed them over the edge because their dream of a Communist America would not be realized. Liberals alone think they are qualified to govern and that their ideology is the one immutable truth. They overlook one eensy-weensy detail. Liberalism is not based on results, but intentions.

 

[Truthmatters]

dear fucking crazed idiot.

SCOTUS decision.


you are just proving how insane your party has become

 

[Zoom-boing]

I see someone has decided to stop taking their meds.

Oh, and ran out of money to continue on with those civility classes.

Loop-d-loop.

 

[Truthmatters]

For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”

The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.




Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times


these are facts no matter how many silly names you call me and how much you lie about these facts

these facts cant be denied by any sane person

 

[Truthmatters]

how fucking sick does a party have to be to wholesale deny the courts of our country?

 

[KNB]

Sane question: "How many dead people voted for Barack Obama in 2012?"

Republican answer: "We don't know how many there were because we don't have voter ID laws, so the number must be in the millions."

This is the Conservative GOP argument for ID laws:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw]Paul Weyrich - "I don't want everybody to vote" (Goo Goo) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Truthmatters]

GOP Memo Admits Plan Could 'Keep Black Vote Down' - Los Angeles Times


they have been caught repeatedly cheating voters.

The MSM hardly EVER mentions it.

 

[BorisTheAnimal]

Deshy is nothing but a one trick pony. this is all the DNC whore talks about.

 

[KNB]

How many dead people voted for Obama?