SCOTUS rules that Biden has 100% power over enforcing immigration or not enforcing it, basically whatever he wants

[Votto]

Supreme Court allows Biden administration to limit immigration arrests

The court found that Texas and Louisiana, the two states that brought the suit, lacked standing to challenge the administration's guidelines.

www.yahoo.com

Border states that are getting crushed by the Federal policy on immigration just got overruled by SCOTUS that lets the continued destruction of those states via uncontrolled immigration. The laws on the books be damned.

And as some bus loads go out to cities like New York, who scream for help just with the few they have to take care of, the nation and SCOTUS has turned their backs on these states forever.

Naturally, when Trump was in there he was prevented from building a border wall, but that was before, and this is now!

 

[Donald H]

The corrupt Scotus is distancing itself from Trump.

 

[1srelluc]

The ruling is correct, it's Tater's band-o-turds that need to be strung-up.

 

[Votto]

The ruling is correct, it's Tater's band-o-turds that need to be strung-up.

Who says? Where does that say that in the Constitution exactly?

Is it the same place a judge said children can be groomed?

Hmm?

The drug cartels run things in the US government, just like they do in Mexico.

 

[BackAgain]

Supreme Court allows Biden administration to limit immigration arrests

The court found that Texas and Louisiana, the two states that brought the suit, lacked standing to challenge the administration's guidelines.

www.yahoo.com

Border states that are getting crushed by the Federal policy on immigration just got overruled by SCOTUS that lets the continued destruction of those states via uncontrolled immigration. The laws on the books be damned.

And as some bus loads go out to cities like New York, who scream for help just with the few they have to take care of, the nation and SCOTUS has turned their backs on these states forever.

Naturally, when Trump was in there he was prevented from building a border wall, but that was before, and this is now!

I seem to recall that the SCOTUS had a different view when the President was Trump.

 

[1srelluc]

Who says? Where does that say that in the Constitution exactly?

Is it the same place a judge said children can be groomed?

Hmm?

The drug cartels run things in the US government, just like they do in Mexico.

When congress cedes their power to the executive branch because they won't do their jobs legislatively you get what you get here.

It's not SCOTUS's job to make laws, that's congress's job.

 

[Votto]

When congress cedes their power to the executive branch because they won't do their jobs legislatively you get what you get here.

It's not SCOTUS's job to make laws, that's congress's job.

Congress passed laws that the President ignores as Congress is afraid to change those laws.

 

[Orangecat]

So the border disaster is all on Biden?
Excellent.

 

[Votto]

I seem to recall that the SCOTUS had a different view when the President was Trump.

Indeed.

Funny that.

 

[Votto]

So the border disaster is all on Biden?
Excellent.

No, no, no!!

Putin done that

Besides, January 6th, damn your eyes!

 

[MarathonMike]

We are witnessing the self-destruction of the greatest nation in modern history. It is now "normal" for completely unknown, undocumented people to waltz into our country from anywhere in the world and be released into the country. What is their criminal record? What diseases do they have? Are they terrorists? Are they child sex traffickers? If they followed our LEGAL immigration process, we would know.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

When congress cedes their power to the executive branch because they won't do their jobs legislatively you get what you get here.

It's not SCOTUS's job to make laws, that's congress's job.

Correct me if I'm wrong here but don't we already have laws on immigration previously passed by Congress?

The way I see it, SCOTUS is saying the POTUS only has to follow laws he agrees with.
I never saw anything in the Constitution that says POTUS can selectively enforce laws

 

[jotathought]

Biden has already demonstrated his position on illegal immigration and the direct consequences of it: record surge with drug trafficking, sex trafficking and illegal immigration.

 

[White 6]

Supreme Court allows Biden administration to limit immigration arrests

The court found that Texas and Louisiana, the two states that brought the suit, lacked standing to challenge the administration's guidelines.

www.yahoo.com

Border states that are getting crushed by the Federal policy on immigration just got overruled by SCOTUS that lets the continued destruction of those states via uncontrolled immigration. The laws on the books be damned.

And as some bus loads go out to cities like New York, who scream for help just with the few they have to take care of, the nation and SCOTUS has turned their backs on these states forever.

Naturally, when Trump was in there he was prevented from building a border wall, but that was before, and this is now!

Kavanaugh was correct in his majority (8:1) opinion. Prioritizing is the only way. Somebody gets to prioritize Federal effort and it will remain POTUS.
Biden administration that directed ICE agents to prioritize:
1. The arrest of immigrants with serious criminal records.
2. The arrest of immigrants considered, national security threats and migrants who recently entered the U.S. illegally.

If you cannot catch everybody today, you must have a priority of who to go after first, and it will remain with the Federal Government for the Federal Effort, not the state.

 

[1srelluc]

Correct me if I'm wrong here but don't we already have laws on immigration previously passed by Congress?

The way I see it, SCOTUS is saying the POTUS only has to follow laws he agrees with.
I never saw anything in the Constitution that says POTUS can selectively enforce laws

It's also not SCOTUS's job to enforce law.

 

[Votto]

Kavanaugh was correct in his majority (8:1) opinion. Prioritizing is the only way. Somebody gets to prioritize Federal effort and it will remain POTUS.
Biden administration that directed ICE agents to prioritize:
1. The arrest of immigrants with serious criminal records.
2. The arrest of immigrants considered, national security threats and migrants who recently entered the U.S. illegally.

If you cannot catch everybody today, you must have a priority of who to go after first, and it will remain with the Federal Government for the Federal Effort, not the state.

Where does it say this anywhere in the Constitution?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Just a thought here...

Maybe Congress should expand the funding of ICE and the court system to deal with 11,000,000 illegal aliens and account for new illegal aliens coming across the border, overstaying visa's, etc.

But if you are only going to fund (for example) a force able to deal with 2,000,000 illegals - don't complain when those doing the job have to prioritize and can't deal with 100%.

WW

 

[White 6]

Where does it say this anywhere in the Constitution?

Pretty much everywhere. State pay rolled personnel are directed at state priorities. Likewise Federal personnel are under direction of the Federal Government. You should read it sometime.

 

[SavannahMann]

Supreme Court allows Biden administration to limit immigration arrests

The court found that Texas and Louisiana, the two states that brought the suit, lacked standing to challenge the administration's guidelines.

www.yahoo.com

Border states that are getting crushed by the Federal policy on immigration just got overruled by SCOTUS that lets the continued destruction of those states via uncontrolled immigration. The laws on the books be damned.

And as some bus loads go out to cities like New York, who scream for help just with the few they have to take care of, the nation and SCOTUS has turned their backs on these states forever.

Naturally, when Trump was in there he was prevented from building a border wall, but that was before, and this is now!

I wonder what would happen if Conservatives were honest. Just once.

Trump was prevented from building the wall because he ignored all the legally mandated studies that had to be done. Environmental impact studies, engineering studies, and a host of other things.

What the Court has said is that Texas doesn’t have the right to use the courts for this. They don’t have standing.

It says so right in the linked article. But as usual you didn’t bother reading the article, or were inept at comprehending the words. I wonder which it is?

 

[SavannahMann]

Correct me if I'm wrong here

The amount of effort would be daunting to anyone.